Clinical outcomes after surgery for benign stomach versus colorectal perforations

Free perforation of stomach or colorectum usually necessitates emergency surgery. Perforation is associated with short-term mortality and morbidity in up to 30% and 50% of patients, respectively, due to secondary peritonitis and sepsis. We hypothesized that postoperative clinical outcomes after colorectal perforation (CRP) are worse than those with stomach perforation (SP). This retrospective study aimed to compare the early postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with stomach and colorectal perforations, focusing on morbidity and mortality, and identify differences that could indicate potential changes in surgical management. Data from 214 patients who underwent surgery for stomach and colorectal perforations were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including morbidity and mortality during hospitalization of the two groups of patients. One group consisted of patients with SP, and the second group consisted of patients with CRP. The incidences of postoperative cardiac, gastrointestinal, and nephrological complications; sepsis; planned reoperation; reoperation due to complications; median operation time; median blood loss; and median hospital stay after surgery were significantly higher in patients with CRP than in those with SP. After adjusting for potential confounders such as BMI and nicotine use using a logistic regression model, we observed additional that the incidence of postoperative surgical complications was significantly higher in the CRP group compared to the SP group. Peritonitis was significantly more common in the SP group. In addition, overall medical complications and mortality were common in the total patient population and were higher in the CRP than in SP group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Mortality and morbidity rates following surgery for SP and CRP were similar and often life threatening. However, patients with CRP experience worse clinical outcomes more often, indicating a more complex injury requiring considerably more medical intervention and extended treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03338-1
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes after surgery for benign stomach versus colorectal perforations

Matthias Glanemann, Nour Alkhanji, Iurii Snopok, Saleh Lahes et al.
BMC Surgery
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

Clinical outcomes after surgery for benign stomach versus colorectal perforations

Matthias Glanemann, Nour Alkhanji, Iurii Snopok, Saleh Lahes, Gudrun Wagenpfeil, M. Abdulla
article en

Abstract

Free perforation of stomach or colorectum usually necessitates emergency surgery. Perforation is associated with short-term mortality and morbidity in up to 30% and 50% of patients, respectively, due to secondary peritonitis and sepsis. We hypothesized that postoperative clinical outcomes after colorectal perforation (CRP) are worse than those with stomach perforation (SP). This retrospective study aimed to compare the early postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with stomach and colorectal perforations, focusing on morbidity and mortality, and identify differences that could indicate potential changes in surgical management. Data from 214 patients who underwent surgery for stomach and colorectal perforations were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including morbidity and mortality during hospitalization of the two groups of patients. One group consisted of patients with SP, and the second group consisted of patients with CRP. The incidences of postoperative cardiac, gastrointestinal, and nephrological complications; sepsis; planned reoperation; reoperation due to complications; median operation time; median blood loss; and median hospital stay after surgery were significantly higher in patients with CRP than in those with SP. After adjusting for potential confounders such as BMI and nicotine use using a logistic regression model, we observed additional that the incidence of postoperative surgical complications was significantly higher in the CRP group compared to the SP group. Peritonitis was significantly more common in the SP group. In addition, overall medical complications and mortality were common in the total patient population and were higher in the CRP than in SP group; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Mortality and morbidity rates following surgery for SP and CRP were similar and often life threatening. However, patients with CRP experience worse clinical outcomes more often, indicating a more complex injury requiring considerably more medical intervention and extended treatment.

BMC SurgeryVol. 25(1)
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum (DE), Saarland University (DE)
Universität des Saarlandes
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.