Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of immunochemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter pilot trial

Abstract Introduction: R-CHOP is the current standard first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common and severe complication in these patients. Mecapegfilgrastim is a long-acting pegylated recombinant human G-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF) and a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim.This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing CIN in treatment-naive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, controlled exploratory trial (NO. ChiCTR2100048196), DLBCL patients aged 18-75 years without prior systemic chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive mecapegfilgrastim (6 mg, 24-48 hours post-chemotherapy) or no prophylactic intervention. Both groups received 4 cycles of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like chemotherapy. Recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) was administered when neutrophil counts fell below 0.5×109/L in the mecapegfilgrastim group and below 1.0×109/L in the control group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L) during cycle 1.Results: From October 2021 to June 2024, 42 patients were enrolled. In the mecapegfilgrastim group, 28 patients were included, with a median age of 58 years (range: 33-75 years), and 13 patients (46.4%) were male. In the control group, 14 patients were included, with a median age of 46 years (range: 26-74 years), and six patients (42.9%) were male. The baseline ANC in the mecapegfilgrastim group was 4.20 ± 2.8×109/L, compared to 4.39 ± 2.3×109/L in the control group. White blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and platelet counts were comparable between the two groups. During cycle 1, the grade ≥3 neutropenia rate was 32.14% (95% CI, 15.88 to 52.35) in the mecapegfilgrastim group versus 64.29% (95% CI, 35.14 to 87.24) in the control group (difference: -32.14%; 95% CI, -58.23 to -0.01; nominal P=0.096). Across cycles 2–4 and overall (cycles 1–4), the mecapegfilgrastim group consistently showed lower grade ≥3 neutropenia rates (differences: -29.77%, -40.45%, -48.99%, and -57.14%, respectively; nominal P<0.05, except for cycle 2). Mean nadir neutrophil counts were higher in the mecapegfilgrastim group across all cycles (nominal P<0.05). No cases of febrile neutropenia occurred in the mecapegfilgrastim group, compared to one case in the control group. Short-acting G-CSF use was lower in the mecapegfilgrastim group across all cycles (nominal P<0.05, except for cycle 3). The objective response rate (ORR) was 75.0% (95% CI, 55.1 to 89.3) in the mecapegfilgrastim group and 57.1% (95% CI, 28.9 to 82.3) in the control group (nominal P=0.298). Grade ≥3 neutropenia rates were lower in the mecapegfilgrastim group among ORR achievers and non-achievers (nominal P values: 0.0352 and 0.0210, respectively). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 42.9% of the mecapegfilgrastim group and 92.9% of controls; serious TEAEs were reported in 7.1% of patients in both groups.Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate that the long-acting G-CSF, mecapegfilgrastim, exhibits a favorable safety profile and effectively reduced the incidence and severity of CIN in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. These findings support its potential as a prophylactic option in this population, warranting further investigation in large-scale randomized trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-7210
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of immunochemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter pilot trial

Ting Niu, Qiaochu Lin, He Li, Jie Wang et al.
Blood
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of immunochemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter pilot trial

Ting Niu, Qiaochu Lin, He Li, Jie Wang, Wei Jin, Jie Zhou, Chunrong Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: R-CHOP is the current standard first-line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a common and severe complication in these patients. Mecapegfilgrastim is a long-acting pegylated recombinant human G-CSF (PEG-rhG-CSF) and a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim.This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing CIN in treatment-naive patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, controlled exploratory trial (NO. ChiCTR2100048196), DLBCL patients aged 18-75 years without prior systemic chemotherapy were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive mecapegfilgrastim (6 mg, 24-48 hours post-chemotherapy) or no prophylactic intervention. Both groups received 4 cycles of R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like chemotherapy. Recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) was administered when neutrophil counts fell below 0.5×109/L in the mecapegfilgrastim group and below 1.0×109/L in the control group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.0×109/L) during cycle 1.Results: From October 2021 to June 2024, 42 patients were enrolled. In the mecapegfilgrastim group, 28 patients were included, with a median age of 58 years (range: 33-75 years), and 13 patients (46.4%) were male. In the control group, 14 patients were included, with a median age of 46 years (range: 26-74 years), and six patients (42.9%) were male. The baseline ANC in the mecapegfilgrastim group was 4.20 ± 2.8×109/L, compared to 4.39 ± 2.3×109/L in the control group. White blood cell counts, hemoglobin levels, and platelet counts were comparable between the two groups. During cycle 1, the grade ≥3 neutropenia rate was 32.14% (95% CI, 15.88 to 52.35) in the mecapegfilgrastim group versus 64.29% (95% CI, 35.14 to 87.24) in the control group (difference: -32.14%; 95% CI, -58.23 to -0.01; nominal P=0.096). Across cycles 2–4 and overall (cycles 1–4), the mecapegfilgrastim group consistently showed lower grade ≥3 neutropenia rates (differences: -29.77%, -40.45%, -48.99%, and -57.14%, respectively; nominal P<0.05, except for cycle 2). Mean nadir neutrophil counts were higher in the mecapegfilgrastim group across all cycles (nominal P<0.05). No cases of febrile neutropenia occurred in the mecapegfilgrastim group, compared to one case in the control group. Short-acting G-CSF use was lower in the mecapegfilgrastim group across all cycles (nominal P<0.05, except for cycle 3). The objective response rate (ORR) was 75.0% (95% CI, 55.1 to 89.3) in the mecapegfilgrastim group and 57.1% (95% CI, 28.9 to 82.3) in the control group (nominal P=0.298). Grade ≥3 neutropenia rates were lower in the mecapegfilgrastim group among ORR achievers and non-achievers (nominal P values: 0.0352 and 0.0210, respectively). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 42.9% of the mecapegfilgrastim group and 92.9% of controls; serious TEAEs were reported in 7.1% of patients in both groups.Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate that the long-acting G-CSF, mecapegfilgrastim, exhibits a favorable safety profile and effectively reduced the incidence and severity of CIN in DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. These findings support its potential as a prophylactic option in this population, warranting further investigation in large-scale randomized trials.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Xiamen University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN), Deyang Stomatological Hospital (CN), Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University (CN), Nanchong Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.