Updated real-world outcomes with brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients: A multicenter, retrospective study from China

Abstract Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was first approved in China in 2020 for the treatment of patients with CD30-positive lymphoma. A real-world study conducted in 2022 in Chinese lymphoma patients demonstrated notable effectiveness and moderate toxicity when treated with BV-based regimens. Here, we present updated results from this study, which includes a larger cohort and longer follow-up period. Methods: This multi-center, retrospective study was carried out across three real-world centers in central China, involving patients diagnosed with lymphoma who received BV treatment between August 2020 and April 2025. Results: A total of 252 patients with CD30-positive lymphoma were included in the analysis. Of these, 44.8% were diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), 27.4% with systemic Page 4 of 24 anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), and 27.8% with other types of lymphoma. The median number of BV-based therapy cycles administered was 4.0 (range: 1.0–21.0). Effectiveness analysis was performed on 234 patients, revealing an overall response rate (ORR) of 67.1% and a complete response (CR) rate of 39.7%. Among those who received BV as a first-line therapy, the ORR and CR rates were significantly higher, at 73.3% and 49.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 0.1–55.6 months), the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 87.1% and 83.8%, respectively, while the 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.9% and 76.4%, respectively. In patients who were treated with BV as first-line therapy, the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were even more favorable, reaching 91.4% and 87.5%, respectively, and the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates both peaked at 80.2%. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) of any grade was 85.7%, with the most frequently reported AEs being anemia (41.3%), leukopenia (38.9%), and infections (29.4%). A total of 44 patients underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT), with 31 patients receiving BV-based bridge therapy and 10 patients receiving BV as consolidation therapy following SCT. Conclusions: Our findings further solidify the role of BV as an efficacious and generally well-tolerated treatment for Chinese patients with CD30-positive lymphoma. Besides, the results underscore its potential not only in first-line therapy but also as a bridge therapy and consolidation to SCT, thereby highlighting its utility in various stages of lymphoma treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-7206
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Updated real-world outcomes with brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients: A multicenter, retrospective study from China

Xingchen Liu, Keshu Zhou, Yanliang Bai, Mingzhi Zhang et al.
Blood
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Updated real-world outcomes with brentuximab vedotin in lymphoma patients: A multicenter, retrospective study from China

Xingchen Liu, Keshu Zhou, Yanliang Bai, Mingzhi Zhang, Xudong Zhang, Honghan Qiao, Huijie Nan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Brentuximab vedotin (BV) was first approved in China in 2020 for the treatment of patients with CD30-positive lymphoma. A real-world study conducted in 2022 in Chinese lymphoma patients demonstrated notable effectiveness and moderate toxicity when treated with BV-based regimens. Here, we present updated results from this study, which includes a larger cohort and longer follow-up period. Methods: This multi-center, retrospective study was carried out across three real-world centers in central China, involving patients diagnosed with lymphoma who received BV treatment between August 2020 and April 2025. Results: A total of 252 patients with CD30-positive lymphoma were included in the analysis. Of these, 44.8% were diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), 27.4% with systemic Page 4 of 24 anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL), and 27.8% with other types of lymphoma. The median number of BV-based therapy cycles administered was 4.0 (range: 1.0–21.0). Effectiveness analysis was performed on 234 patients, revealing an overall response rate (ORR) of 67.1% and a complete response (CR) rate of 39.7%. Among those who received BV as a first-line therapy, the ORR and CR rates were significantly higher, at 73.3% and 49.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17.6 months (range: 0.1–55.6 months), the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 87.1% and 83.8%, respectively, while the 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.9% and 76.4%, respectively. In patients who were treated with BV as first-line therapy, the 1-year and 2-year OS rates were even more favorable, reaching 91.4% and 87.5%, respectively, and the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates both peaked at 80.2%. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) of any grade was 85.7%, with the most frequently reported AEs being anemia (41.3%), leukopenia (38.9%), and infections (29.4%). A total of 44 patients underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT), with 31 patients receiving BV-based bridge therapy and 10 patients receiving BV as consolidation therapy following SCT. Conclusions: Our findings further solidify the role of BV as an efficacious and generally well-tolerated treatment for Chinese patients with CD30-positive lymphoma. Besides, the results underscore its potential not only in first-line therapy but also as a bridge therapy and consolidation to SCT, thereby highlighting its utility in various stages of lymphoma treatment.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Henan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.