Behavioral strategies and pupillary response in a rewarded stop-signal task

Cognitive control, specifically inhibition, is essential for behavior adaptation to environmental changes. While reward expectation influences cognitive strategies, it is still underexplored how reward may influence inhibitory control and how and whether this may be reflected in autonomic physiological responses. In this study, we explore whether trial-by-trial reward cues modulate both behavioral performance and pupil size, an autonomic correlate of cognitive effort. Twenty-five participants performed a rewarded Stop-Signal Task under three reward conditions: Go Plus (greater reward for correctly performed movements Go trials), Stop Plus (greater reward for correctly inhibited movements Stop trials), and Neutral (equal reward for both trial types). Although inhibitory ability remained unchanged across reward conditions, Go trials' accuracy was higher in Go Plus and Neutral conditions. Reaction times were longer in Go trials in the Stop Plus condition, where inhibition was most rewarded. When task strategies required balancing focus to achieve high rewards in both trial types, pupil size increased, suggesting increased cognitive effort. These findings support the hypothesis that reward expectancy shapes cognitive control and its autonomic correlates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.113305
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavioral strategies and pupillary response in a rewarded stop-signal task

Stefano Ferraina, Emiliano Brunamonti, Valentina Giuffrida, Isabel Beatrice Marc et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
article

Behavioral strategies and pupillary response in a rewarded stop-signal task

Stefano Ferraina, Emiliano Brunamonti, Valentina Giuffrida, Isabel Beatrice Marc, Pierpaolo Pani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cognitive control, specifically inhibition, is essential for behavior adaptation to environmental changes. While reward expectation influences cognitive strategies, it is still underexplored how reward may influence inhibitory control and how and whether this may be reflected in autonomic physiological responses. In this study, we explore whether trial-by-trial reward cues modulate both behavioral performance and pupil size, an autonomic correlate of cognitive effort. Twenty-five participants performed a rewarded Stop-Signal Task under three reward conditions: Go Plus (greater reward for correctly performed movements Go trials), Stop Plus (greater reward for correctly inhibited movements Stop trials), and Neutral (equal reward for both trial types). Although inhibitory ability remained unchanged across reward conditions, Go trials' accuracy was higher in Go Plus and Neutral conditions. Reaction times were longer in Go trials in the Stop Plus condition, where inhibition was most rewarded. When task strategies required balancing focus to achieve high rewards in both trial types, pupil size increased, suggesting increased cognitive effort. These findings support the hypothesis that reward expectancy shapes cognitive control and its autonomic correlates.

International Journal of PsychophysiologyVol. 220
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.