Laboratory investigation of the gradual asphaltene precipitation and mineral re-deposition from injection to production spot during varying concentration of CO₂ injection in an Iranian carbonate reservoir: A novel insight into CO₂ enhanced oil recove

This study investigates the effects of CO₂ and flue gas injection on asphaltene deposition and mineral dissolution in an Iranian carbonate reservoir with an initial pressure of 4100.0 psi and a temperature of 74.0°C. Four representative carbonate core plugs were used in flooding experiments—first as a composite core and then individually—to evaluate asphaltene precipitation from the injection to production points. Static dissolution effects were analyzed using SEM imaging, while dynamic impacts were assessed through gas flooding tests in the presence of formation water. Slim-tube simulations (PVTi in ECLIPSE software) determined the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for different injectants: CO₂ (3134.0 psi), Flue Gas 1 (20.00 % CO₂/80.00 % N₂; 6190.0 psi), Flue Gas 2 (40.00 % CO₂/60.00 % N₂; 5420.0 psi), and Flue Gas 3 (60.00 % CO₂/40.00 % N₂; 4740.0 psi). SEM analysis and gas mobility trends confirmed significant rock dissolution under reservoir conditions, indicating that permeability impairment during flooding resulted exclusively from asphaltene deposition. Damage severity was quantified via cyclohexane mobility, showing permeability reductions of 30.79% (CO₂), 7.64 % (Flue Gas 1), 10.13 % (Flue Gas 2), and 18.08 % (Flue Gas 3), with higher CO₂ concentrations correlating to greater asphaltene deposition. Individual plug assessments using the residual resistance factor (RRF) revealed higher asphaltene accumulation near injection points due to direct gas-oil contact, while production-end oil flowed without significant deposition. Despite stronger asphaltene effects during CO₂ injection, it achieved superior oil recovery (64.00 %) compared to Flue Gas 1 (33.00%), 2 (41.00%), and 3 (54.00 %). This is attributed to CO₂’s ability to reduce oil viscosity, lower interfacial tension, and enhance oil swelling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108600
Primary Topic
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laboratory investigation of the gradual asphaltene precipitation and mineral re-deposition from injection to production spot during varying concentration of CO₂ injection in an Iranian carbonate reservoir: A novel insight into CO₂ enhanced oil recove

Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Jamshid Moghadasi, Reza Jamali, Sadraddin Sobhani et al.
Results in Engineering
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
article

Laboratory investigation of the gradual asphaltene precipitation and mineral re-deposition from injection to production spot during varying concentration of CO₂ injection in an Iranian carbonate reservoir: A novel insight into CO₂ enhanced oil recove

Mohammad Reza Khaleghi, Jamshid Moghadasi, Reza Jamali, Sadraddin Sobhani, Siavash Partonia
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of CO₂ and flue gas injection on asphaltene deposition and mineral dissolution in an Iranian carbonate reservoir with an initial pressure of 4100.0 psi and a temperature of 74.0°C. Four representative carbonate core plugs were used in flooding experiments—first as a composite core and then individually—to evaluate asphaltene precipitation from the injection to production points. Static dissolution effects were analyzed using SEM imaging, while dynamic impacts were assessed through gas flooding tests in the presence of formation water. Slim-tube simulations (PVTi in ECLIPSE software) determined the minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) for different injectants: CO₂ (3134.0 psi), Flue Gas 1 (20.00 % CO₂/80.00 % N₂; 6190.0 psi), Flue Gas 2 (40.00 % CO₂/60.00 % N₂; 5420.0 psi), and Flue Gas 3 (60.00 % CO₂/40.00 % N₂; 4740.0 psi). SEM analysis and gas mobility trends confirmed significant rock dissolution under reservoir conditions, indicating that permeability impairment during flooding resulted exclusively from asphaltene deposition. Damage severity was quantified via cyclohexane mobility, showing permeability reductions of 30.79% (CO₂), 7.64 % (Flue Gas 1), 10.13 % (Flue Gas 2), and 18.08 % (Flue Gas 3), with higher CO₂ concentrations correlating to greater asphaltene deposition. Individual plug assessments using the residual resistance factor (RRF) revealed higher asphaltene accumulation near injection points due to direct gas-oil contact, while production-end oil flowed without significant deposition. Despite stronger asphaltene effects during CO₂ injection, it achieved superior oil recovery (64.00 %) compared to Flue Gas 1 (33.00%), 2 (41.00%), and 3 (54.00 %). This is attributed to CO₂’s ability to reduce oil viscosity, lower interfacial tension, and enhance oil swelling.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.