Climate-smart agriculture as disaster risk reduction: Effectiveness varies by hazard type in Pakistan

Climate change increasingly threatens agricultural systems globally, with Pakistan ranking among the most climate-vulnerable countries. This study systematically compared climate-smart agriculture (CSA) effectiveness across different disaster types in Sindh Province, Pakistan: riverine flooding (Dadu), drought (Tharparkar), and coastal flooding (Thatta). A multi-scale analysis combined climate data, area-weighted agricultural vulnerability assessment using 3889 district-crop yield records (2004–2023), and farmer surveys ( n ​= ​88). Climate analysis showed significant Arabian Sea warming (0.41 ​°C ​decade −1 , p ​< ​0.01) with high precipitation variability (coefficient of variation ​≈ ​72 ​%). The corrected area-weighted vulnerability assessment ranked Tharparkar most vulnerable (#1, index: 66.23), followed by Thatta (#8, 31.69) and Dadu (#19, 24.77) among 23 districts. Drought analysis identified 2 of 20 years meeting drought criteria (Standardized Precipitation Index ≤ −0.5) in Tharparkar. CSA adoption varied significantly by disaster type (Kruskal-Wallis H ​= ​74.06, p ​< ​0.001). Strong positive correlation between CSA practices and disaster resilience emerged in drought-vulnerable Tharparkar ( r ​= ​0.756, p ​< ​0.001, explaining 57 ​% of variance), while flood-prone districts showed negligible relationships (Thatta: r ​= ​−0.089, p ​> ​0.05; Dadu: zero variance). Future projections indicate substantial sea-level rise of ∼331–751 ​mm by 2100 across Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios. Results demonstrate CSA practices effectively reduce climate disaster risks in drought-prone systems, but effectiveness varies by disaster type, requiring tailored implementation approaches. This research provides the first systematic evidence comparing CSA effectiveness across different disaster contexts, supporting targeted rather than uniform adaptation policies. • CSA effectiveness varies by disaster type: strong in drought, negligible in flooding. • Arabian Sea warming accelerated fourfold to 0.41 ​°C ​decade −1 since 2004. • Drought-prone Tharparkar ranked most vulnerable among 23 districts analyzed. • CSA practices explained 57 ​% resilience variance in drought-vulnerable areas. • Targeted adaptation policies needed rather than uniform CSA approaches.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Climate smart agriculture.
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csag.2025.100093
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate-smart agriculture as disaster risk reduction: Effectiveness varies by hazard type in Pakistan

Hafeez Ahmed Talpur, Haider Ali, Shakeel Ahmed Talpur, Matthew T. Mahar et al.
Climate smart agriculture.
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Climate-smart agriculture as disaster risk reduction: Effectiveness varies by hazard type in Pakistan

Hafeez Ahmed Talpur, Haider Ali, Shakeel Ahmed Talpur, Matthew T. Mahar, Aziz Ahmed, Amanullah Mahar, Habibullah Abbasi, Khalid Usman Shar, Peters Egbedi, Sirilak Chaiboontha
article en

Abstract

Climate change increasingly threatens agricultural systems globally, with Pakistan ranking among the most climate-vulnerable countries. This study systematically compared climate-smart agriculture (CSA) effectiveness across different disaster types in Sindh Province, Pakistan: riverine flooding (Dadu), drought (Tharparkar), and coastal flooding (Thatta). A multi-scale analysis combined climate data, area-weighted agricultural vulnerability assessment using 3889 district-crop yield records (2004–2023), and farmer surveys ( n ​= ​88). Climate analysis showed significant Arabian Sea warming (0.41 ​°C ​decade −1 , p ​< ​0.01) with high precipitation variability (coefficient of variation ​≈ ​72 ​%). The corrected area-weighted vulnerability assessment ranked Tharparkar most vulnerable (#1, index: 66.23), followed by Thatta (#8, 31.69) and Dadu (#19, 24.77) among 23 districts. Drought analysis identified 2 of 20 years meeting drought criteria (Standardized Precipitation Index ≤ −0.5) in Tharparkar. CSA adoption varied significantly by disaster type (Kruskal-Wallis H ​= ​74.06, p ​< ​0.001). Strong positive correlation between CSA practices and disaster resilience emerged in drought-vulnerable Tharparkar ( r ​= ​0.756, p ​< ​0.001, explaining 57 ​% of variance), while flood-prone districts showed negligible relationships (Thatta: r ​= ​−0.089, p ​> ​0.05; Dadu: zero variance). Future projections indicate substantial sea-level rise of ∼331–751 ​mm by 2100 across Shared Socioeconomic Pathway scenarios. Results demonstrate CSA practices effectively reduce climate disaster risks in drought-prone systems, but effectiveness varies by disaster type, requiring tailored implementation approaches. This research provides the first systematic evidence comparing CSA effectiveness across different disaster contexts, supporting targeted rather than uniform adaptation policies. • CSA effectiveness varies by disaster type: strong in drought, negligible in flooding. • Arabian Sea warming accelerated fourfold to 0.41 ​°C ​decade −1 since 2004. • Drought-prone Tharparkar ranked most vulnerable among 23 districts analyzed. • CSA practices explained 57 ​% resilience variance in drought-vulnerable areas. • Targeted adaptation policies needed rather than uniform CSA approaches.

Climate smart agriculture.Vol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.