Integrative clinical and molecular analysis of outcome in elderly African ancestry Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Abstract Introduction: African Ancestry (AA) mediates inferior overall survival (OS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), a feature highlighted by SEER registries and CALGB-Alliance. We demonstrated that social vulnerability, higher rates of Myelodysplasia- Related (MR) Chromosomic Abnormalities (Abn) [e.g., 7q and -7] and DNA repair mutations (mut) [e.g., RAD21, FBXW7]characterize elderly AA AML [Williams et al. BMC Cancer. 2025 in press]. The leukemogenic mechanism integrating MR-genomic defects, DNA repair and AA leukemogenesis is unresolved. Leukemia cells express myeloid antigens paralleling healthy hematopoiesis but accumulate specific molecular defects in cells with variable differentiation arrest (e.g., less differentiated cells mostly harboring MR mut). Here, we hypothesize that genomic alterations, differentiation arrest and deregulated transcriptome may inform AA leukemogenic mechanisms. Methods: After IRB approval, 72 and 169 AA and non-AA elderly AML patients age 60 years and older were included in analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to assess categorical variables. Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression were used to investigate differential OS and variables with independent prognostic effect. One and two sample T-tests prioritized deregulated genes in 12 and 11 AA and non-AA cases of new AML diagnoses. Bonferroni correction was used for one sample T-tests. ToppGene [] identified canonical deregulated pathways. All analyses were done using SAS version 9.4. Results: Median age was 73 (y) (61-93) and 71 y, (61-90) in AA and non-AA. 65% were male. In AA, 1/60 (1.6%), 18/60 (30%), and 41/60 (68.3%) were favorable, intermediate and adverse ELN 2022, whereas 13/136 (10%), 52/136 (38.2%) and 71/136 (52.2%) were favorable, intermediate and adverse in non-AA AML, p=0.04. ELN 22 [HR=0.18, CI 95 0.09-0.42, p=<.0001] and age [HR=1.02, CI 95 1.01-1.03, p=0.0006] were associated with OS. In AA vs non-AA, favorable and intermediate ELN22 risk disparity was induced by lack of Core Binding Factor (CBF) Abn [0/21 (0%) vs 9/35 (26%), p=0.01], lower NPM1 [1/27 (4%) vs 12/49 (24.4%), p=0.02] and lack of FLT3 ITD mut [0/27 (0%) vs 7/47(15%), p=0.03], suggesting that AA AML genome induces less proliferative disease than non-AA. To address this, we examined WBC, marrow blast % and flow cytometry differentiation arrest for cell subtype in 25 and 100 elderly AA and non-AA cases from an external testing cohort. Mean WBC was 18.5 and 52.8 K/uL [p=0.001] and marrow blast 37.6% and 57.7% [p=0.004] for 25 AA and 100 non-AA. HPC like subtype [Hemopoietic stem cell + Common myeloid progenitor + Multipotent progenitor] was 15/20 (75%) and maturing-like subtype [Monocytic and Granulocytic progenitors] 5/20 (25%), p=0.03. However, in non-AA cases, 51/100 (51%) and 49/100 (49%) were HPC and maturing -like. 39/1495 genes demonstrated deregulation based on alpha=0.05 with Bonferroni correction applied. In AA AML, FAS (p=0.0001), CD28 (p=0.006), TNFAIP3 (p=0.01) were downregulated with most significant results. IL13RA2 (p=0.002), BDNF (p=0.004), PRP8F (p=0.006) and ALDH1A1 (p=0.03) demonstrated upregulation with most significant results. T-cell receptor signaling and T-cell activation (FDR=1.32E-3), Nucleotide excision repair (FDR=3.16E-3) and B-cell dysfunction (FDR=3.16E-3) pathways were most impacted by downregulated genes; whereas ligand gated receptor (FDR=2.21E-2) and protein RNA complex assembly (FDR=4.04E-2) pathways were enriched by upregulated genes. Conclusions: Less immunophenotypically differentiated disease with hypoproliferative potential, lack of CBF Abn, low frequency of NPM1/FLT3 ITD mut are observed in elderly AA AML. Adaptive immune T/B cell dysfunction, defects in nucleotide excision repair, compensatory protein RNA complex, ligand gated receptor and stemness-like physiology [e.g., upregulated ALDH1A1 expression] characterize elderly AA leukemogenesis. Transcriptomic validation with larger number of AA AML cases is needed. However, our data represents proof of concept for immune deregulation involved in AA leukemogenesis. Also, single cell multiomics could deconvolute spatial/cell type interactions to facilitate novel therapies for this vulnerable population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-1733
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrative clinical and molecular analysis of outcome in elderly African ancestry Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Suzane Silbert, David M. Swoboda, Jason L. Salemi, Marci O’Driscoll et al.
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Integrative clinical and molecular analysis of outcome in elderly African ancestry Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Suzane Silbert, David M. Swoboda, Jason L. Salemi, Marci O’Driscoll, Maher Albitar, John R. Basile, Tiphaine C. Martin, Lacey Williams, Gustavo Rivero, Alexandra Thalberg, Amy Wu, Anne S. Renteria, Gary M. Kupfer, Linda Linderbeck, Amy C. Alman, Martha Pritchett Mims, Nidia Zapata, Olivia Wilkins, Jonathan Andreadakis, Anna Krzeczowska, Alexander Shkembi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: African Ancestry (AA) mediates inferior overall survival (OS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), a feature highlighted by SEER registries and CALGB-Alliance. We demonstrated that social vulnerability, higher rates of Myelodysplasia- Related (MR) Chromosomic Abnormalities (Abn) [e.g., 7q and -7] and DNA repair mutations (mut) [e.g., RAD21, FBXW7]characterize elderly AA AML [Williams et al. BMC Cancer. 2025 in press]. The leukemogenic mechanism integrating MR-genomic defects, DNA repair and AA leukemogenesis is unresolved. Leukemia cells express myeloid antigens paralleling healthy hematopoiesis but accumulate specific molecular defects in cells with variable differentiation arrest (e.g., less differentiated cells mostly harboring MR mut). Here, we hypothesize that genomic alterations, differentiation arrest and deregulated transcriptome may inform AA leukemogenic mechanisms. Methods: After IRB approval, 72 and 169 AA and non-AA elderly AML patients age 60 years and older were included in analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to assess categorical variables. Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression were used to investigate differential OS and variables with independent prognostic effect. One and two sample T-tests prioritized deregulated genes in 12 and 11 AA and non-AA cases of new AML diagnoses. Bonferroni correction was used for one sample T-tests. ToppGene [] identified canonical deregulated pathways. All analyses were done using SAS version 9.4. Results: Median age was 73 (y) (61-93) and 71 y, (61-90) in AA and non-AA. 65% were male. In AA, 1/60 (1.6%), 18/60 (30%), and 41/60 (68.3%) were favorable, intermediate and adverse ELN 2022, whereas 13/136 (10%), 52/136 (38.2%) and 71/136 (52.2%) were favorable, intermediate and adverse in non-AA AML, p=0.04. ELN 22 [HR=0.18, CI 95 0.09-0.42, p=<.0001] and age [HR=1.02, CI 95 1.01-1.03, p=0.0006] were associated with OS. In AA vs non-AA, favorable and intermediate ELN22 risk disparity was induced by lack of Core Binding Factor (CBF) Abn [0/21 (0%) vs 9/35 (26%), p=0.01], lower NPM1 [1/27 (4%) vs 12/49 (24.4%), p=0.02] and lack of FLT3 ITD mut [0/27 (0%) vs 7/47(15%), p=0.03], suggesting that AA AML genome induces less proliferative disease than non-AA. To address this, we examined WBC, marrow blast % and flow cytometry differentiation arrest for cell subtype in 25 and 100 elderly AA and non-AA cases from an external testing cohort. Mean WBC was 18.5 and 52.8 K/uL [p=0.001] and marrow blast 37.6% and 57.7% [p=0.004] for 25 AA and 100 non-AA. HPC like subtype [Hemopoietic stem cell + Common myeloid progenitor + Multipotent progenitor] was 15/20 (75%) and maturing-like subtype [Monocytic and Granulocytic progenitors] 5/20 (25%), p=0.03. However, in non-AA cases, 51/100 (51%) and 49/100 (49%) were HPC and maturing -like. 39/1495 genes demonstrated deregulation based on alpha=0.05 with Bonferroni correction applied. In AA AML, FAS (p=0.0001), CD28 (p=0.006), TNFAIP3 (p=0.01) were downregulated with most significant results. IL13RA2 (p=0.002), BDNF (p=0.004), PRP8F (p=0.006) and ALDH1A1 (p=0.03) demonstrated upregulation with most significant results. T-cell receptor signaling and T-cell activation (FDR=1.32E-3), Nucleotide excision repair (FDR=3.16E-3) and B-cell dysfunction (FDR=3.16E-3) pathways were most impacted by downregulated genes; whereas ligand gated receptor (FDR=2.21E-2) and protein RNA complex assembly (FDR=4.04E-2) pathways were enriched by upregulated genes. Conclusions: Less immunophenotypically differentiated disease with hypoproliferative potential, lack of CBF Abn, low frequency of NPM1/FLT3 ITD mut are observed in elderly AA AML. Adaptive immune T/B cell dysfunction, defects in nucleotide excision repair, compensatory protein RNA complex, ligand gated receptor and stemness-like physiology [e.g., upregulated ALDH1A1 expression] characterize elderly AA leukemogenesis. Transcriptomic validation with larger number of AA AML cases is needed. However, our data represents proof of concept for immune deregulation involved in AA leukemogenesis. Also, single cell multiomics could deconvolute spatial/cell type interactions to facilitate novel therapies for this vulnerable population.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Winthrop-University Hospital (US), University of Minnesota (US), Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Georgetown University (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Tampa General Hospital (US), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (US), Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (MX), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.