A phase 2 Study of teclistamab in combination with daratumumab in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The IFM2021-01 teclille trial, cohort a

Abstract Background. Teclistamab is a subcutaneous bispecific IgG4 antibody targeting BCMA on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells, enabling T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody used in combination with standard agents. The current standard-of-care regimens in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include the triplet DRd (MAIA) or quadruplet combinations of anti-CD38 antibodies with RVd. These regimens show remarkable efficacy with 32% to 61% MRD negativity at 10-5 and prolonged PFS. However, further optimization of treatment strategies remains a key focus of research efforts for patients with MM. Recently, the combination of teclistamab and daratumumab (Tec-Dara) has demonstrated strong efficacy in the relapsed setting with deep responses. Most trials currently evaluate triplet combinations of BCMA-directed bispecific antibodies with daratumumab and lenalidomide (MajesTEC-7 and MagnetisMM-6). The IFM2021-01 trial is a phase 2 study evaluating the doublets teclistamab-daratumumab (Cohort A) and teclistamab-lenalidomide (Cohort B) in frontline transplant-ineligible patients. Here, we report Cohort A (Tec-Dara), an “all-antibody-based” frontline treatment for patients with NDMM. Methods. IFM2021-01 is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients aged ≥65 years with NDMM, ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Teclistamab was administered subcutaneously with step-up doses (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg) followed by 1.5 mg/kg treatment doses on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1. Maintenance dosing continued at 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks thereafter. Daratumumab SC (1800 mg) was given weekly in Cycles 1–2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3–6, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better after 4 cycles per IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, MRD-negativity by NGS at 10-5 and 10-6, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety was assessed per CTCAE v5.0. The protocol was approved by the French Agency (ANSM) and an external Ethics Committee. The study is conducted by Lille University Hospital and the IFM French Myeloma group in collaboration and with financial support from Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, a member of the Johnson & Johnson group of companies (EU CT 2024-514101-65; ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05572229). Results. A total of 37 patients were enrolled in Cohort A. The median age was 73 years, with 11 (30%) patients above the age of 75 years, and 20 (54%) were female. Overall, 33 (89%) patients had ECOG 0 or 1 and 4 (11%) had ECOG 2; 16 (44%) patients were fit, 12 (33%) were intermediate, and 8 (22%) were frail based on the IMWG frailty score. A total of 25 (68%) patients had standard-risk cytogenetics and 12 (32%) had high-risk features (according to the new IMS/IMWG consensus). The primary endpoint - rate of VGPR or better after 4 cycles was 78%. At data cut-off (08/07/2025), the median follow-up time was 7.6 months (13.1 months for 18 patients; 6 months for 19 patients). The ORR at best response was 100%, with 36 (97%) achieving VGPR or better. The MRD negativity rate at 6 months by NGS at 10-6 was 51% in the intention-to-treat population and 100% in the 21 evaluable patients (16 were not evaluable for MRD at 6 months due to missing or invalid samples). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. No progression or death occurred during the follow up. The rates of PFS, and OS were 100% each. Regarding safety, 28 (76%) of patients had grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and 8 (22%) had serious AEs (SAE) – with no grade 5 AEs. The rate of grade ≥3 hematologic AEs was 46%, with 27% neutropenia. Overall, 5 (14%) patients had grade ≥3 infections. All patients received immunoglobulin replacement therapy at inception of treatment. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 1 (3%) patient. Conclusions. IFM2021-01 Cohort A demonstrates that an “all-antibody–based” doublet regimen of teclistamab and daratumumab is highly effective and well-tolerated in elderly patients with NDMM, with deep responses, high MRD negativity, and a favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A phase 2 Study of teclistamab in combination with daratumumab in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The IFM2021-01 teclille trial, cohort a

Diptendu Santra, Thierry T.F. Facon, Jean Bastié, Jill Corre et al.
1 citations
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
article

A phase 2 Study of teclistamab in combination with daratumumab in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The IFM2021-01 teclille trial, cohort a

Diptendu Santra, Thierry T.F. Facon, Jean Bastié, Jill Corre, Salomon Manier, M. Macro, Jérôme Lambert, Philippe Moreau, Xavier P Leleu, Clara Mariette, Pavel Smirnov, Julie Gay, Cyrille Touzeau, Caroline Jacquet, Hervé Avet‐Loiseau, Laure Vincent, Thomas Chalopin, Aurore Perrot, Sophie Rigaudeau, Margaret Doyle, Anne Rumpler, Lydia Montes, Noémie Bigot, Cyrille Hulin, Mamoun Dib, Claire Albrecht, Cecile Sonntag Mottier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background. Teclistamab is a subcutaneous bispecific IgG4 antibody targeting BCMA on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells, enabling T-cell–mediated cytotoxicity. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody used in combination with standard agents. The current standard-of-care regimens in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) include the triplet DRd (MAIA) or quadruplet combinations of anti-CD38 antibodies with RVd. These regimens show remarkable efficacy with 32% to 61% MRD negativity at 10-5 and prolonged PFS. However, further optimization of treatment strategies remains a key focus of research efforts for patients with MM. Recently, the combination of teclistamab and daratumumab (Tec-Dara) has demonstrated strong efficacy in the relapsed setting with deep responses. Most trials currently evaluate triplet combinations of BCMA-directed bispecific antibodies with daratumumab and lenalidomide (MajesTEC-7 and MagnetisMM-6). The IFM2021-01 trial is a phase 2 study evaluating the doublets teclistamab-daratumumab (Cohort A) and teclistamab-lenalidomide (Cohort B) in frontline transplant-ineligible patients. Here, we report Cohort A (Tec-Dara), an “all-antibody-based” frontline treatment for patients with NDMM. Methods. IFM2021-01 is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 2 study enrolling patients aged ≥65 years with NDMM, ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation. Teclistamab was administered subcutaneously with step-up doses (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg) followed by 1.5 mg/kg treatment doses on Days 8 and 15 of Cycle 1. Maintenance dosing continued at 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks thereafter. Daratumumab SC (1800 mg) was given weekly in Cycles 1–2, every 2 weeks in Cycles 3–6, and every 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better after 4 cycles per IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, MRD-negativity by NGS at 10-5 and 10-6, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety was assessed per CTCAE v5.0. The protocol was approved by the French Agency (ANSM) and an external Ethics Committee. The study is conducted by Lille University Hospital and the IFM French Myeloma group in collaboration and with financial support from Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, a member of the Johnson & Johnson group of companies (EU CT 2024-514101-65; ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05572229). Results. A total of 37 patients were enrolled in Cohort A. The median age was 73 years, with 11 (30%) patients above the age of 75 years, and 20 (54%) were female. Overall, 33 (89%) patients had ECOG 0 or 1 and 4 (11%) had ECOG 2; 16 (44%) patients were fit, 12 (33%) were intermediate, and 8 (22%) were frail based on the IMWG frailty score. A total of 25 (68%) patients had standard-risk cytogenetics and 12 (32%) had high-risk features (according to the new IMS/IMWG consensus). The primary endpoint - rate of VGPR or better after 4 cycles was 78%. At data cut-off (08/07/2025), the median follow-up time was 7.6 months (13.1 months for 18 patients; 6 months for 19 patients). The ORR at best response was 100%, with 36 (97%) achieving VGPR or better. The MRD negativity rate at 6 months by NGS at 10-6 was 51% in the intention-to-treat population and 100% in the 21 evaluable patients (16 were not evaluable for MRD at 6 months due to missing or invalid samples). Median DOR, PFS, and OS were not reached. No progression or death occurred during the follow up. The rates of PFS, and OS were 100% each. Regarding safety, 28 (76%) of patients had grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and 8 (22%) had serious AEs (SAE) – with no grade 5 AEs. The rate of grade ≥3 hematologic AEs was 46%, with 27% neutropenia. Overall, 5 (14%) patients had grade ≥3 infections. All patients received immunoglobulin replacement therapy at inception of treatment. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 1 (3%) patient. Conclusions. IFM2021-01 Cohort A demonstrates that an “all-antibody–based” doublet regimen of teclistamab and daratumumab is highly effective and well-tolerated in elderly patients with NDMM, with deep responses, high MRD negativity, and a favorable safety profile.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Saint Louis University Hospital (US), Université de Poitiers (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon (FR), Johnson & Johnson (Ireland) (IE), Johnson & Johnson (France) (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), Unité de Recherche Interdisplinaire Octogone (FR), Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque (FR), Johnson & Johnson (Italy) (IT), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon (FR), Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Versailles (FR), Institut Lavoisier de Versailles (FR), Université d'Angers (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Nantes Université (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
1.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.