Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A reappraisal for low-resource settings

Abstract Background: While chlorambucil has largely been replaced by novel targeted therapies in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in high-income countries, it remains one of the few accessible treatment options in many low- and middle-income regions. When combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab, chlorambucil has shown improved outcomes, particularly in elderly patients or those with comorbidities. This study aims to reassess the efficacy and safety of this regimen in light of global disparities in access to newer therapies. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive CLL, with particular relevance to settings where access to first-line targeted therapies remains limited. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases was conducted in June 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the obinutuzumab-chlorambucil combination in previously untreated CLL patients. Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), incidence of cardiovascular events, neutropenia, all-cause mortality, and CKD-related mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in R (v4.4.2) to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 956 articles were screened, of which 5 RCTs comprising 1,347 patients were included; 947 (43.28%) received obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil. The pooled ORR was 78.56% (95% CI: 74.94–81.97) (Figure 1A), and CRR was 13.4% (95% CI: 4.34–26.25) (Figure 1B). Cardiovascular events occurred in 3.37% (95% CI: 1.09–6.69) (Figure 2A), while neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity with 14.90% (95% CI: 12.28–17.52) (Figure 2B). All-cause mortality was 7.87% (95% CI: 4.61–12.78) (Figure 2C), with CKD-related mortality at 1.18% (95% CI: 0.26–4.84) (Figure 2D) Conclusion: Despite being phased out in wealthier health systems, chlorambucil remains a relevant therapeutic option when combined with obinutuzumab—especially in regions where modern targeted therapies are unavailable. This regimen offers a viable, evidence-backed alternative for treatment-naive CLL patients in low-resource settings, with acceptable safety and efficacy profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-7440
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A reappraisal for low-resource settings

Cilomar Martins de Oliveira Filho, Clara Campoverde, Khalid M. Taha, Bezalel Hakkeem et al.
Blood
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
article

Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A reappraisal for low-resource settings

Cilomar Martins de Oliveira Filho, Clara Campoverde, Khalid M. Taha, Bezalel Hakkeem, J. P. De M. E. Abreu, Assaina Tatiana Jaquissone Tomo, Thiago de Albuquerque Farias Camarotti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: While chlorambucil has largely been replaced by novel targeted therapies in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in high-income countries, it remains one of the few accessible treatment options in many low- and middle-income regions. When combined with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab, chlorambucil has shown improved outcomes, particularly in elderly patients or those with comorbidities. This study aims to reassess the efficacy and safety of this regimen in light of global disparities in access to newer therapies. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil in treatment-naive CLL, with particular relevance to settings where access to first-line targeted therapies remains limited. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases was conducted in June 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the obinutuzumab-chlorambucil combination in previously untreated CLL patients. Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR), incidence of cardiovascular events, neutropenia, all-cause mortality, and CKD-related mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model in R (v4.4.2) to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 956 articles were screened, of which 5 RCTs comprising 1,347 patients were included; 947 (43.28%) received obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil. The pooled ORR was 78.56% (95% CI: 74.94–81.97) (Figure 1A), and CRR was 13.4% (95% CI: 4.34–26.25) (Figure 1B). Cardiovascular events occurred in 3.37% (95% CI: 1.09–6.69) (Figure 2A), while neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity with 14.90% (95% CI: 12.28–17.52) (Figure 2B). All-cause mortality was 7.87% (95% CI: 4.61–12.78) (Figure 2C), with CKD-related mortality at 1.18% (95% CI: 0.26–4.84) (Figure 2D) Conclusion: Despite being phased out in wealthier health systems, chlorambucil remains a relevant therapeutic option when combined with obinutuzumab—especially in regions where modern targeted therapies are unavailable. This regimen offers a viable, evidence-backed alternative for treatment-naive CLL patients in low-resource settings, with acceptable safety and efficacy profiles.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), University of Cuenca (EC), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute (IN), Instituto Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud - Fundación Héctor A. Barceló (AR), Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.