Patient perspectives on the burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome: Results from the Phase 3 natron interview sub-study

Abstract Background Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses a group of rare disorders characterized by persistently high levels of eosinophils that confer end-organ damage and dysfunction. While HES signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts are known to be heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity impedes diagnosis and treatment, the diversity of experiences that patients with HES report is poorly documented in the literature. Here, we report symptoms and HRQoL impacts described by patients in the qualitative interview sub-study of an interventional trial. Methods NATRON (NCT04191304) is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, 24-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with FIP1L1::PDGFRA-negative HES. In the sub-study reported here, interested NATRON patients in Poland (n=21) and the US (n=8) participated in a telephone interview lasting ~90 minutes. Interviews followed a semi-structured discussion guide and were scheduled between 7 and 21 days after the last dose of DB treatment. Topics discussed included HES diagnosis journey, HES-associated signs and symptoms, reasons for participating in the study, expectations related to joining the study, and personal definitions of treatment success. Results Of the 29 patients who participated in the interview, the majority were female (89.7%, n=26). All patients were White (100%, n=29). Among patients who reported their educational attainment, 34.5% (n=10) had a high school education or less, 24.1% (n=7) had a bachelor's degree, 17.2% (n=5) held a graduate degree, and 13.8% (n=4) selected “other”. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 48.6 (16.6) years, with a mean (SD) time since diagnosis of 36.5 (40.4) months. Patients reported experiencing 60 signs and symptoms related to HES, which were organized into 13 domains during the analysis. The pulmonary/respiratory, constitutional, sinonasal, dermatological, musculoskeletal, and neurological domains had signs or symptoms reported by more than 70% of patients. Symptoms reported by more than 50% of patients were coughing (75.9%, n=22), shortness of breath (72.4%, n=21), and wheezing (69.0%, n=20) in the pulmonary/respiratory domain; fatigue (79.3%, n=23), weakness (65.5%, n=19), malaise (58.6%, n=17), and chills/sweats (51.7%, n=15) in the constitutional domain; nasal congestion (69.0%, n=20), runny nose (55.2%, n=16), and sneezing (55.2%, n=16) in the sinonasal domain; itching (69.0%, n=20) in the dermatological domain; and muscle ache/pain (51.7%, n=15) and joint ache/pain (51.7%, n=15) in the musculoskeletal domain. The most frequently reported HRQoL impacts of HES were general activities of daily living (ADL) (82.8%, n=24; ADL domain), difficulty sleeping (62.1%, n=18; ADL domain), physical activity (75.9%, n=22; physical domain), social life (69.0%, n=20; social domain), and work impacts (51.7%, n=15; functional domain). Reasons for participating in the study included to improve their health situation (75.9%, n=22), to avoid systemic corticosteroid use (34.5%, n=10), to seek alternative treatment (20.7%, n=6), because of physician recommendation (17.2%, n=5), and to help others with HES (3.4%, n=1). The most commonly reported expectations from study participation were to enhance health (55.2%, n=16) and/or quality of life (17.2%, n=5), and other expectations such as reducing or stopping steroid use and/or experiencing minimal side effects (17.2%, n=5). Finally, the most common definitions of success were improvement in/reduction of symptoms (27.6%, n=8), complete resolution of signs and symptoms (10.3%, n=3), and finding an effective treatment other than systemic corticosteroids (6.9%, n=2). Conclusions Patients with HES experience a broad range of signs and symptoms, with specific impacts on ADL and physical well-being. The findings of this sub-study underscore the high burden of HES symptoms and suggest an urgent need for timely diagnosis and targeted treatment. Additional research on patients' experiences of living with HES and with HES treatment is warranted, and further planned analyses aim to expand on these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-4465
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient perspectives on the burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome: Results from the Phase 3 natron interview sub-study

Piotr Kuna, Amy D. Klion, Calvin Wai-Loon Ho, Princess U. Ogbogu et al.
Blood
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
article

Patient perspectives on the burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome: Results from the Phase 3 natron interview sub-study

Piotr Kuna, Amy D. Klion, Calvin Wai-Loon Ho, Princess U. Ogbogu, Anna Kovalszki, Julie Bailey, Florence Roufosse, Marta Chełmińska, Jennifer W Hill, Irma González, Piotr Łacwik, Peter Bressler, Lila Bahadori, Elena Pérez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) encompasses a group of rare disorders characterized by persistently high levels of eosinophils that confer end-organ damage and dysfunction. While HES signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impacts are known to be heterogeneous, and this heterogeneity impedes diagnosis and treatment, the diversity of experiences that patients with HES report is poorly documented in the literature. Here, we report symptoms and HRQoL impacts described by patients in the qualitative interview sub-study of an interventional trial. Methods NATRON (NCT04191304) is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, 24-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with FIP1L1::PDGFRA-negative HES. In the sub-study reported here, interested NATRON patients in Poland (n=21) and the US (n=8) participated in a telephone interview lasting ~90 minutes. Interviews followed a semi-structured discussion guide and were scheduled between 7 and 21 days after the last dose of DB treatment. Topics discussed included HES diagnosis journey, HES-associated signs and symptoms, reasons for participating in the study, expectations related to joining the study, and personal definitions of treatment success. Results Of the 29 patients who participated in the interview, the majority were female (89.7%, n=26). All patients were White (100%, n=29). Among patients who reported their educational attainment, 34.5% (n=10) had a high school education or less, 24.1% (n=7) had a bachelor's degree, 17.2% (n=5) held a graduate degree, and 13.8% (n=4) selected “other”. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 48.6 (16.6) years, with a mean (SD) time since diagnosis of 36.5 (40.4) months. Patients reported experiencing 60 signs and symptoms related to HES, which were organized into 13 domains during the analysis. The pulmonary/respiratory, constitutional, sinonasal, dermatological, musculoskeletal, and neurological domains had signs or symptoms reported by more than 70% of patients. Symptoms reported by more than 50% of patients were coughing (75.9%, n=22), shortness of breath (72.4%, n=21), and wheezing (69.0%, n=20) in the pulmonary/respiratory domain; fatigue (79.3%, n=23), weakness (65.5%, n=19), malaise (58.6%, n=17), and chills/sweats (51.7%, n=15) in the constitutional domain; nasal congestion (69.0%, n=20), runny nose (55.2%, n=16), and sneezing (55.2%, n=16) in the sinonasal domain; itching (69.0%, n=20) in the dermatological domain; and muscle ache/pain (51.7%, n=15) and joint ache/pain (51.7%, n=15) in the musculoskeletal domain. The most frequently reported HRQoL impacts of HES were general activities of daily living (ADL) (82.8%, n=24; ADL domain), difficulty sleeping (62.1%, n=18; ADL domain), physical activity (75.9%, n=22; physical domain), social life (69.0%, n=20; social domain), and work impacts (51.7%, n=15; functional domain). Reasons for participating in the study included to improve their health situation (75.9%, n=22), to avoid systemic corticosteroid use (34.5%, n=10), to seek alternative treatment (20.7%, n=6), because of physician recommendation (17.2%, n=5), and to help others with HES (3.4%, n=1). The most commonly reported expectations from study participation were to enhance health (55.2%, n=16) and/or quality of life (17.2%, n=5), and other expectations such as reducing or stopping steroid use and/or experiencing minimal side effects (17.2%, n=5). Finally, the most common definitions of success were improvement in/reduction of symptoms (27.6%, n=8), complete resolution of signs and symptoms (10.3%, n=3), and finding an effective treatment other than systemic corticosteroids (6.9%, n=2). Conclusions Patients with HES experience a broad range of signs and symptoms, with specific impacts on ADL and physical well-being. The findings of this sub-study underscore the high burden of HES symptoms and suggest an urgent need for timely diagnosis and targeted treatment. Additional research on patients' experiences of living with HES and with HES treatment is warranted, and further planned analyses aim to expand on these findings.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Jan Kochanowski University (PL), University of Michigan (US), IQVIA (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Gdańsk (PL), Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Research Center (US), ENT and Allergy (US), IQVIA (United States) (US), German Center for Lung Research (DE), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), AstraZeneca (Finland) (FI), Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US), Dermatology Research Center (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.