Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma

Abstract Introduction Zanubrutinib (ZANU), a second-generation BTK inhibitor, was approved in 2021 for the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) based on the ASPEN study. Non-IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), a rare variant comprising 2–5% of LPL cases, is typically excluded from all WM studies, thus creating a critical knowledge gap. Although a biological rationale exists and clinical opinion supports use of ZANU in this disease entity, no published data exist for use of ZANU in treating non-IgM LPL. Thus, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ZANU in patients (pts) with non-IgM LPL. Methods: All LPL/WM pts treated at our center were screened. Eligible pts had confirmed serum IgG/IgA gammopathy and LPL diagnosis confirmed by pathology review at our institution. Response was assessed based on the 6th International Workshop on WM Consensus Criteria. Comparison between treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory pts was done using Fisher's exact test. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods starting from the time of ZANU initiation. Outcomes Of 26 total non-IgM LPL pts, we identified 14 treated with ZANU (6 treatment-naïve, 8 relapsed/refractory). At treatment initiation, the median age was 65.9 years (range, 56–81), and 8 pts (57.1%) were male. The monoclonal protein subtype was IgG in 11 pts (78.6%) with a median level of 3,379 mg/dL, and IgA in 3 pts (21.4%) with a median level of 2,628 mg/dL. All pts had bone marrow involvement; 3 (21.4%) had splenomegaly, 6 (42.9%) had nodal disease, and 1 had central nervous system involvement. The MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in 11 of 12 evaluable pts (91%), and CXCR4 mutations were found in 2 of 8 evaluable pts (25%). Relapsed/refractory pts had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range, 1–3), including rituximab (n = 4), ibrutinib (n = 3), bendamustine-rituximab (n = 1), and rituximab combined with other chemotherapy (n = 2). Pretreatment median hemoglobin was 10.9 g/dL (range, 7.5–14.3), platelets: 177×10⁹/L (range, 103–302), and beta-2 microglobulin 3.3 mg/L (range, 2.3–5.1). The median interval from diagnosis to ZANU initiation was 46.6 months overall (53.6 months for treatment-naïve and 37.6 months for relapsed/refractory pts), and the median time on ZANU was 18.2 months (range, 3.6–26.7). The overall response rate (ORR) was 57%, comprising 2 minor responses (MR), 6 partial responses (PR), and 6 pts with stable disease (SD); no pts achieved a complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR). A higher PR rate (5/6, 83%) was observed in the treatment-naïve group (p = 0.026), while a higher SD rate (5/6, 83%) was observed in the relapsed/refractory group (p = 0.14). Median hemoglobin at best response assessment increased to 12.95 g/dL, with a median increase of 3.4 g/dL among pretreatment anemic pts (n = 7). Four pts required ZANU dose reductions due to adverse events (grade 1 thrombocytopenia and postsurgical bleeding; grade 2 hypertension; and grade 2 arthralgia), with improved tolerability thereafter; all had responding disease at the time of dose reduction, which continued despite dose reduction. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 1–42.5), 11 pts remained on therapy. Two pts discontinued due to progression (one with Bing-Neel syndrome) and one pt due to cardiovascular toxicity. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 92% and 100%, respectively. Notably, the only pt with MYD88 wildtype and CXCR4 mutation achieved a PR with a treatment duration of 5 months. Conclusion: ZANU was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical efficacy in pts with non-IgM LPL, a population historically excluded from WM trials and without any supportive clinical data to guide management. Although the ORR was modest compared to the ASPEN study and no CR/VGPR were achieved, most pts experienced durable disease control and significant hematologic improvement, including notable hemoglobin recovery, irrespective of IgG or IgA subtype. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were favorable. Notably, the response rate was higher in the treatment-naïve pts than in the relapsed/refractory setting. This real-world cohort provides the first dedicated clinical evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of ZANU in this rare LPL subtype, warranting validation in larger studies and in pts with MYD88-wildtype disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5374
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma

Paul A. Hamlin, Paola Ghione, Shenon Sethi, Ahmet Doǧan et al.
Blood
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
article

Efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib in patients with non-IgM lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma

Paul A. Hamlin, Paola Ghione, Shenon Sethi, Ahmet Doǧan, Lia Palomba, Mika Geva, Colette Owens, Michelle Okwali, Alexander P. Boardman, Zachary D. Epstein‐Peterson, Gilles Salles, Lorenzo Falchi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Zanubrutinib (ZANU), a second-generation BTK inhibitor, was approved in 2021 for the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) based on the ASPEN study. Non-IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), a rare variant comprising 2–5% of LPL cases, is typically excluded from all WM studies, thus creating a critical knowledge gap. Although a biological rationale exists and clinical opinion supports use of ZANU in this disease entity, no published data exist for use of ZANU in treating non-IgM LPL. Thus, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ZANU in patients (pts) with non-IgM LPL. Methods: All LPL/WM pts treated at our center were screened. Eligible pts had confirmed serum IgG/IgA gammopathy and LPL diagnosis confirmed by pathology review at our institution. Response was assessed based on the 6th International Workshop on WM Consensus Criteria. Comparison between treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory pts was done using Fisher's exact test. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods starting from the time of ZANU initiation. Outcomes Of 26 total non-IgM LPL pts, we identified 14 treated with ZANU (6 treatment-naïve, 8 relapsed/refractory). At treatment initiation, the median age was 65.9 years (range, 56–81), and 8 pts (57.1%) were male. The monoclonal protein subtype was IgG in 11 pts (78.6%) with a median level of 3,379 mg/dL, and IgA in 3 pts (21.4%) with a median level of 2,628 mg/dL. All pts had bone marrow involvement; 3 (21.4%) had splenomegaly, 6 (42.9%) had nodal disease, and 1 had central nervous system involvement. The MYD88 L265P mutation was detected in 11 of 12 evaluable pts (91%), and CXCR4 mutations were found in 2 of 8 evaluable pts (25%). Relapsed/refractory pts had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range, 1–3), including rituximab (n = 4), ibrutinib (n = 3), bendamustine-rituximab (n = 1), and rituximab combined with other chemotherapy (n = 2). Pretreatment median hemoglobin was 10.9 g/dL (range, 7.5–14.3), platelets: 177×10⁹/L (range, 103–302), and beta-2 microglobulin 3.3 mg/L (range, 2.3–5.1). The median interval from diagnosis to ZANU initiation was 46.6 months overall (53.6 months for treatment-naïve and 37.6 months for relapsed/refractory pts), and the median time on ZANU was 18.2 months (range, 3.6–26.7). The overall response rate (ORR) was 57%, comprising 2 minor responses (MR), 6 partial responses (PR), and 6 pts with stable disease (SD); no pts achieved a complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR). A higher PR rate (5/6, 83%) was observed in the treatment-naïve group (p = 0.026), while a higher SD rate (5/6, 83%) was observed in the relapsed/refractory group (p = 0.14). Median hemoglobin at best response assessment increased to 12.95 g/dL, with a median increase of 3.4 g/dL among pretreatment anemic pts (n = 7). Four pts required ZANU dose reductions due to adverse events (grade 1 thrombocytopenia and postsurgical bleeding; grade 2 hypertension; and grade 2 arthralgia), with improved tolerability thereafter; all had responding disease at the time of dose reduction, which continued despite dose reduction. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 1–42.5), 11 pts remained on therapy. Two pts discontinued due to progression (one with Bing-Neel syndrome) and one pt due to cardiovascular toxicity. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 92% and 100%, respectively. Notably, the only pt with MYD88 wildtype and CXCR4 mutation achieved a PR with a treatment duration of 5 months. Conclusion: ZANU was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical efficacy in pts with non-IgM LPL, a population historically excluded from WM trials and without any supportive clinical data to guide management. Although the ORR was modest compared to the ASPEN study and no CR/VGPR were achieved, most pts experienced durable disease control and significant hematologic improvement, including notable hemoglobin recovery, irrespective of IgG or IgA subtype. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were favorable. Notably, the response rate was higher in the treatment-naïve pts than in the relapsed/refractory setting. This real-world cohort provides the first dedicated clinical evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of ZANU in this rare LPL subtype, warranting validation in larger studies and in pts with MYD88-wildtype disease.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Kettering University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.