Clinical outcomes and safety of tislelizumab maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Abstract Objective: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease who fail standard first-line therapy generally have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory DLBCL; however, the necessity and optimal regimen for post-ASCT maintenance therapy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tislelizumab maintenance therapy after ASCT in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (NCT04799314). Methods:This is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective clinical trial. A total of 150 patients with R/R DLBCL were planned for enrollment. Eligible patients were aged 18–65 years, histologically confirmed DLBCL, and achieved complete response or partial response after second- or later-line chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive tislelizumab (200 mg every 42 days, IV) for eight cycles post-ASCT hematopoietic recovery or no intervention (control). The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety. Results:From February 2021 to March 2025, 60 patients were randomized to receive tislelizumab (n=30) and no intervention (n=30). All 60 enrolled patients were included in the analysis. All patients received similar conditioning regimens and achieved hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. The median follow-up was 34.2 months (range: 3.6–53.4 months). The 2-year PFS rate was 94.4% (95% CI: 66.6%–99.2%) in the tislelizumab versus 72.2% (95% CI: 51.9%–85.0%) in the control group (p=0.012). The 2-year OS rate was 100.0% (95% CI: 100.0%–100.0%) in the tislelizumab group compared to 83.7% (95% CI: 61.7%–93.6%) in the control group (p=0.062). One patient in tislelizumab group (3.3%) experienced grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation, with no other adverse events reported. No treatment discontinuations or dose reductions occurred. Conclusion:Maintenance therapy with tislelizumab after ASCT improves progression-free survival in patients with R/R DLBCL and demonstrates a favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3732
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes and safety of tislelizumab maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Yige Shen, Mengmeng Ji, Wang Li, Siyuan Chen et al.
Blood
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Clinical outcomes and safety of tislelizumab maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large b-cell lymphoma

Yige Shen, Mengmeng Ji, Wang Li, Siyuan Chen, Wei Zhao, Wei Tang, Shu Cheng, Pengpeng Xu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease who fail standard first-line therapy generally have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory DLBCL; however, the necessity and optimal regimen for post-ASCT maintenance therapy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of tislelizumab maintenance therapy after ASCT in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL (NCT04799314). Methods:This is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective clinical trial. A total of 150 patients with R/R DLBCL were planned for enrollment. Eligible patients were aged 18–65 years, histologically confirmed DLBCL, and achieved complete response or partial response after second- or later-line chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive tislelizumab (200 mg every 42 days, IV) for eight cycles post-ASCT hematopoietic recovery or no intervention (control). The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and secondary endpoints included 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and safety. Results:From February 2021 to March 2025, 60 patients were randomized to receive tislelizumab (n=30) and no intervention (n=30). All 60 enrolled patients were included in the analysis. All patients received similar conditioning regimens and achieved hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. The median follow-up was 34.2 months (range: 3.6–53.4 months). The 2-year PFS rate was 94.4% (95% CI: 66.6%–99.2%) in the tislelizumab versus 72.2% (95% CI: 51.9%–85.0%) in the control group (p=0.012). The 2-year OS rate was 100.0% (95% CI: 100.0%–100.0%) in the tislelizumab group compared to 83.7% (95% CI: 61.7%–93.6%) in the control group (p=0.062). One patient in tislelizumab group (3.3%) experienced grade 3 alanine aminotransferase elevation, with no other adverse events reported. No treatment discontinuations or dose reductions occurred. Conclusion:Maintenance therapy with tislelizumab after ASCT improves progression-free survival in patients with R/R DLBCL and demonstrates a favorable safety profile.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Ruijin Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.