Span-dependent comparative analysis of lateral torsional buckling and nonlinear load behaviour in castellated and solid I-beams using analytical and finite element approaches

Abstract Castellated beams (CB), widely employed in modern construction, offer an improved strength-to-weight ratio and enhanced structural efficiency due to their increased depth and moment of inertia. However, the presence of web openings and discontinuous geometry significantly alters their lateral-torsional stiffness, making them more susceptible to lateral-torsional buckling (LTB), particularly. This study investigates the buckling and ultimate load behaviour of CB compared to solid I-sections through analytical (T-section method), numerical (IS 800, Handbook SP6-1-based), and finite element approaches. A steel I-section was castellated to form IC 225 sections with hexagonal openings, maintaining a 50% increase in depth. Both parent and CB were analyzed for three spans: 2 m, 5 m, and 8 m under simply supported conditions and central point loading. Nonlinear static analysis and buckling analysis were conducted in ABAQUS (2024) using shell elements, incorporating initial geometric imperfections equal to depth/500. Results indicate that CB exhibit up to 24%–42% higher ultimate load capacity and up to 37% lower deflection than solid beams due to increased depth and moment of inertia. However, their buckling resistance decreases by 8%–31% due to a decrease in torsional rigidity, with LTB as the dominant failure mode in longer spans. In addition to these expected trends, the study highlights the post-buckling behaviour, for which the stress redistribution characteristics and modes of stability differed between the CB and parent beams. Nonlinear static analysis also showed that loads and deflection changes became almost constant for spans above 5 m, indicating span-dependent nonlinearity. Nonlinear FEM results closely matched numerical predictions, with an error of 7%–11%, confirming model reliability. This study concludes that CB provides superior load performance and stiffness but requires careful design to mitigate LTB and localized Vierendeel failures around web openings. Results reveal a nonlinear response dependence on span, for which the loading and deflection become stabilized beyond 5 m. In comparison with previous works, this study provides new insights into the stress redistribution mechanisms and stability mode transitions of CBs, which contribute to the understanding of design guidelines for long-span steel structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Research Express
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ae284c
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Span-dependent comparative analysis of lateral torsional buckling and nonlinear load behaviour in castellated and solid I-beams using analytical and finite element approaches

Kiran Bhat P, S Ashwitha, Dhanalakshmi Kiran Bhat
Materials Research Express
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Span-dependent comparative analysis of lateral torsional buckling and nonlinear load behaviour in castellated and solid I-beams using analytical and finite element approaches

Kiran Bhat P, S Ashwitha, Dhanalakshmi Kiran Bhat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Castellated beams (CB), widely employed in modern construction, offer an improved strength-to-weight ratio and enhanced structural efficiency due to their increased depth and moment of inertia. However, the presence of web openings and discontinuous geometry significantly alters their lateral-torsional stiffness, making them more susceptible to lateral-torsional buckling (LTB), particularly. This study investigates the buckling and ultimate load behaviour of CB compared to solid I-sections through analytical (T-section method), numerical (IS 800, Handbook SP6-1-based), and finite element approaches. A steel I-section was castellated to form IC 225 sections with hexagonal openings, maintaining a 50% increase in depth. Both parent and CB were analyzed for three spans: 2 m, 5 m, and 8 m under simply supported conditions and central point loading. Nonlinear static analysis and buckling analysis were conducted in ABAQUS (2024) using shell elements, incorporating initial geometric imperfections equal to depth/500. Results indicate that CB exhibit up to 24%–42% higher ultimate load capacity and up to 37% lower deflection than solid beams due to increased depth and moment of inertia. However, their buckling resistance decreases by 8%–31% due to a decrease in torsional rigidity, with LTB as the dominant failure mode in longer spans. In addition to these expected trends, the study highlights the post-buckling behaviour, for which the stress redistribution characteristics and modes of stability differed between the CB and parent beams. Nonlinear static analysis also showed that loads and deflection changes became almost constant for spans above 5 m, indicating span-dependent nonlinearity. Nonlinear FEM results closely matched numerical predictions, with an error of 7%–11%, confirming model reliability. This study concludes that CB provides superior load performance and stiffness but requires careful design to mitigate LTB and localized Vierendeel failures around web openings. Results reveal a nonlinear response dependence on span, for which the loading and deflection become stabilized beyond 5 m. In comparison with previous works, this study provides new insights into the stress redistribution mechanisms and stability mode transitions of CBs, which contribute to the understanding of design guidelines for long-span steel structures.

Materials Research ExpressVol. 12(12)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.