Assessing the impact of rider-only escalator etiquette using agent-based modelling

Escalator etiquette, especially during peak demand periods, influences congestion, flow, throughput, and safety across a variety of public infrastructures. Often, escalator etiquette dictates standing on one side and walking on the other (e.g., Stand on the Right and Walk on the Left, in the UK). Several studies suggest that when passengers stand on both sides, on an ascending escalator, increases both throughput and safety. This work examines when a rider-only etiquette is beneficial, using the buildingEXODUS agent-based model to simulate escalator use and egress from an underground station. The study evaluates the impact of escalator etiquette on a tall escalator (24 m) under varying demand conditions in terms of throughput, crowding, individual and station performance. Simulation results are compared against the Holborn Pilot study conducted within the London Underground metro system to support the credibility of the insights provided. The findings indicate that at demand levels producing congestion at or beyond 1.0 p/m2 at the base of the escalator, a rider-only strategy offers clear benefits: increased escalator throughput (by 38.9 at 4p/m2), decreased station and per-person egress times (by 66.77 at 4p/m2, and 26.5 at 4 p/m2, respectively), and reduced exposure to congestion for the entire population (by 15.8–74.2 across all conditions) and per person (by 15.7–74.4 across all conditions). These results demonstrate that simulation tools can provide insights that are difficult to obtain from live trials and can support operators in improving a station’s throughput and safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107064
Primary Topic
Elevator Systems and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the impact of rider-only escalator etiquette using agent-based modelling

L. Filippidis, Peter Lawrence, S. Gwynne, Edwin R. Galea
Safety Science
Elevator Systems and Control
article

Assessing the impact of rider-only escalator etiquette using agent-based modelling

L. Filippidis, Peter Lawrence, S. Gwynne, Edwin R. Galea
article en

Abstract

Escalator etiquette, especially during peak demand periods, influences congestion, flow, throughput, and safety across a variety of public infrastructures. Often, escalator etiquette dictates standing on one side and walking on the other (e.g., Stand on the Right and Walk on the Left, in the UK). Several studies suggest that when passengers stand on both sides, on an ascending escalator, increases both throughput and safety. This work examines when a rider-only etiquette is beneficial, using the buildingEXODUS agent-based model to simulate escalator use and egress from an underground station. The study evaluates the impact of escalator etiquette on a tall escalator (24 m) under varying demand conditions in terms of throughput, crowding, individual and station performance. Simulation results are compared against the Holborn Pilot study conducted within the London Underground metro system to support the credibility of the insights provided. The findings indicate that at demand levels producing congestion at or beyond 1.0 p/m2 at the base of the escalator, a rider-only strategy offers clear benefits: increased escalator throughput (by 38.9 at 4p/m2), decreased station and per-person egress times (by 66.77 at 4p/m2, and 26.5 at 4 p/m2, respectively), and reduced exposure to congestion for the entire population (by 15.8–74.2 across all conditions) and per person (by 15.7–74.4 across all conditions). These results demonstrate that simulation tools can provide insights that are difficult to obtain from live trials and can support operators in improving a station’s throughput and safety.

Safety ScienceVol. 196
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Elevator Systems and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.