A social-ecological decision framework to support grassland bird conservation in the Upper Missouri River Basin

Grasslands in the North American Great Plains are among the continent's more at-risk and least protected ecosystems. The Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) is a critical region of nearly 750,000 km 2 containing grassland ecosystems vital for grassland bird biodiversity. Most land is privately owned, making voluntary conservation a potential option. Grassland birds face numerous threats with agricultural conversion of native grasslands likely the primary driver of habitat loss and fragmentation. Grasslands in the UMRB provide multiple ecosystem services to human communities including agricultural production, recreation, and wildlife habitat. Our objectives were to demonstrate how maps of social values, derived from UMRB resident surveys ( n = 1009), can be integrated with modeled grassland bird species richness and risk of habitat loss to develop a decision framework that informs conservation design and improves prioritization of voluntary conservation efforts on private lands. We used a public participation GIS survey to collect spatial data to model conservation and recreation values. These were paired with modeled bird species richness, and hotspot analysis and spatial overlays were used to identify areas of co-occurring social and ecological value. We assessed the risk of projected grassland habitat loss across different hotspot combinations. Results showed that areas with high or moderate social and ecological value made up 40% of land but accounted for 51% of projected habitat loss. This is 26% more habitat at risk than expected based on area alone. Targeting appropriate conservation strategies in these areas could yield disproportionately larger benefits in reducing habitat loss risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.112170
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A social-ecological decision framework to support grassland bird conservation in the Upper Missouri River Basin

Darius J. Semmens, Meghann Elizabeth Jarchow, Reza Goljani Amirkhiz, Benson C. Sherrouse et al.
1 links
Biological Conservation
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

A social-ecological decision framework to support grassland bird conservation in the Upper Missouri River Basin

Darius J. Semmens, Meghann Elizabeth Jarchow, Reza Goljani Amirkhiz, Benson C. Sherrouse, Benjamin S. Rashford, Amy M. Nagler, David L. Swanson
article en

Abstract

Grasslands in the North American Great Plains are among the continent's more at-risk and least protected ecosystems. The Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) is a critical region of nearly 750,000 km 2 containing grassland ecosystems vital for grassland bird biodiversity. Most land is privately owned, making voluntary conservation a potential option. Grassland birds face numerous threats with agricultural conversion of native grasslands likely the primary driver of habitat loss and fragmentation. Grasslands in the UMRB provide multiple ecosystem services to human communities including agricultural production, recreation, and wildlife habitat. Our objectives were to demonstrate how maps of social values, derived from UMRB resident surveys ( n = 1009), can be integrated with modeled grassland bird species richness and risk of habitat loss to develop a decision framework that informs conservation design and improves prioritization of voluntary conservation efforts on private lands. We used a public participation GIS survey to collect spatial data to model conservation and recreation values. These were paired with modeled bird species richness, and hotspot analysis and spatial overlays were used to identify areas of co-occurring social and ecological value. We assessed the risk of projected grassland habitat loss across different hotspot combinations. Results showed that areas with high or moderate social and ecological value made up 40% of land but accounted for 51% of projected habitat loss. This is 26% more habitat at risk than expected based on area alone. Targeting appropriate conservation strategies in these areas could yield disproportionately larger benefits in reducing habitat loss risk.

Biological ConservationVol. 324
University of Wyoming (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), University of South Dakota (US), Denver Federal Center (US), Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center (US)
National Science Foundation
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon