Cultural resilience and coping with disasters in the past: A theoretical framework

This article proposes a novel theoretical framework for the study of cultural resilience in the context of historical disasters. Defined as the cultural practices by which communities cope with current calamities, past disasters, and possible future threats, cultural resilience can be divided into four basic elements: sense-making, charity, commemoration, and – as a result of the previous three – community building. We further distinguish both social and temporal dimensions. The social dimension pertains directly to those communities involved with the disaster, whereas the temporal dimension refers to the way in which sense-making, charity, and commemorative practices relate, not only to the past and the present, but also the future. The framework is illustrated with two historical case studies: eighteenth-century conflagrations – the devastating fires that befell several Dutch towns – and the 1953 North Sea Flood. • Introduces a novel theoretical framework for the cultural history of disasters revolving the concept of cultural resilience. • Outlines four elements that constitute cultural resilience: (1) sense-making, (2) mobilizing charity, (3) commemoration, and (4) community building. • Applies the model to two illustrative case studies from the Netherlands: late-eighteenth-century fire disasters and the North Sea Flood of 1953. • Suggests avenues for further research, including the adverse sides of community building.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Geography
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2025.11.008
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural resilience and coping with disasters in the past: A theoretical framework

Lotte Jensen, Adriaan Duiveman
Journal of Historical Geography
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Cultural resilience and coping with disasters in the past: A theoretical framework

Lotte Jensen, Adriaan Duiveman
article en

Abstract

This article proposes a novel theoretical framework for the study of cultural resilience in the context of historical disasters. Defined as the cultural practices by which communities cope with current calamities, past disasters, and possible future threats, cultural resilience can be divided into four basic elements: sense-making, charity, commemoration, and – as a result of the previous three – community building. We further distinguish both social and temporal dimensions. The social dimension pertains directly to those communities involved with the disaster, whereas the temporal dimension refers to the way in which sense-making, charity, and commemorative practices relate, not only to the past and the present, but also the future. The framework is illustrated with two historical case studies: eighteenth-century conflagrations – the devastating fires that befell several Dutch towns – and the 1953 North Sea Flood. • Introduces a novel theoretical framework for the cultural history of disasters revolving the concept of cultural resilience. • Outlines four elements that constitute cultural resilience: (1) sense-making, (2) mobilizing charity, (3) commemoration, and (4) community building. • Applies the model to two illustrative case studies from the Netherlands: late-eighteenth-century fire disasters and the North Sea Flood of 1953. • Suggests avenues for further research, including the adverse sides of community building.

Journal of Historical GeographyVol. 91
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.