Dosimetry and chemical yield analysis of metal nanoparticles in FLASH radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study

<i>Objective.</i>To investigate the influence of high-<i>Z</i>metallic nanoparticles (NPs) (Au, Ag, Pt) influence both physical dose deposition and radiochemical yields (⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) under conventional dose rate (CDR) and ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation, and to explore whether their presence modulates the FLASH effect, either enhancing or suppressing it depending on context.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOol for PArticle Simulation-nBio/Geant4-DNA toolkit to model water radiolysis in the presence of a 50 nm metallic NP. Electron and photon beams of 1 MeV were delivered under multi-source configurations with varying inter-source distances, representing both CDR and FLASH-like conditions. The evolution of chemical species was tracked from 1 ps to 1 ms, and<i>G</i>-values for⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>were extracted.<i>Main results.</i>NPs increased local energy deposition through the emission of low-energy secondary electrons; however, chemical yields exhibited nonlinear and configuration-dependent behavior. Under FLASH-like conditions, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>yields were consistently reduced, and this suppression was further modulated by NP type and source geometry. In some cases, NPs acted as radiosensitizers (increased⋅OHyields), while in others they showed radioprotective trends (reduced⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>). These effects stem from competing mechanisms including radical-radical recombination, scavenging at NP surfaces, and spatial heterogeneity of secondary electron distributions (based on the inter-track and intra-track analysis).<i>Significance.</i>This work demonstrates that NP-assisted FLASH radiotherapy involves a complex interplay between physical and chemical processes, where increased dose deposition does not always translate into higher radiochemical yields. The dual role of NPs-as both potential radiosensitizers and radioprotectors-underscores the need for careful parameter optimization and experimental validation before clinical translation of NP-enhanced FLASH protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae281d
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetry and chemical yield analysis of metal nanoparticles in FLASH radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study

Ramin Abolfath, Abbas Ghasemizad, Sedigheh Fardirad
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Dosimetry and chemical yield analysis of metal nanoparticles in FLASH radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study

Ramin Abolfath, Abbas Ghasemizad, Sedigheh Fardirad
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>To investigate the influence of high-<i>Z</i>metallic nanoparticles (NPs) (Au, Ag, Pt) influence both physical dose deposition and radiochemical yields (⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) under conventional dose rate (CDR) and ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation, and to explore whether their presence modulates the FLASH effect, either enhancing or suppressing it depending on context.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOol for PArticle Simulation-nBio/Geant4-DNA toolkit to model water radiolysis in the presence of a 50 nm metallic NP. Electron and photon beams of 1 MeV were delivered under multi-source configurations with varying inter-source distances, representing both CDR and FLASH-like conditions. The evolution of chemical species was tracked from 1 ps to 1 ms, and<i>G</i>-values for⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>were extracted.<i>Main results.</i>NPs increased local energy deposition through the emission of low-energy secondary electrons; however, chemical yields exhibited nonlinear and configuration-dependent behavior. Under FLASH-like conditions, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>yields were consistently reduced, and this suppression was further modulated by NP type and source geometry. In some cases, NPs acted as radiosensitizers (increased⋅OHyields), while in others they showed radioprotective trends (reduced⋅OHand H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>). These effects stem from competing mechanisms including radical-radical recombination, scavenging at NP surfaces, and spatial heterogeneity of secondary electron distributions (based on the inter-track and intra-track analysis).<i>Significance.</i>This work demonstrates that NP-assisted FLASH radiotherapy involves a complex interplay between physical and chemical processes, where increased dose deposition does not always translate into higher radiochemical yields. The dual role of NPs-as both potential radiosensitizers and radioprotectors-underscores the need for careful parameter optimization and experimental validation before clinical translation of NP-enhanced FLASH protocols.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(24)
Sharif University of Technology (IR), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Howard University (US), University of Guilan (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.