Oral decitabine/cedazuridine in combination with venetoclax in treatment-naïve high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Updates of a Phase 1/2 clinical trial

Abstract Background: The standard of care treatment for patients with high-risk myelodisplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are hypomethylating agents (HMA). Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for eligible patients with these diseases. Outcomes of HR-MDS and CMML with single-agent HMA are poor, warranting novel combinations to improve survival. We provide the results of a phase 1/2 clinical trial of the combination of oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) in patients with untreated HR-MDS and CMML. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II open-label, single center clinical trial (NCT04655755). Eligibility criteria included patients with untreated HR-MDS (IPSS intermediate-2 or high, IPSS-R ³ 3. 5 or IPSS-M ³ 0) or CMML with excess blasts. The phase I portion (dose escalation) used a standard 3+3 study design to identify the recommended phase II dose (dose expansion). In this last phase efficacy was evaluated. Results: Between January 2021 and August 2024, 69 patients were enrolled. Nine patients were enrolled in the phase I portion: 3 patients received Ven 200mg on days 1-14 and 6 patients received 400mg on days 1-14, all with 5 days DEC-C 100/35mg on days 1-5. No dose-limiting toxicities registered, and the phase II dose was established as Ven 400mg days 1-14. The median age of the entire cohort was 71 years old (21-94), with 49 (70%) male patients. The WHO 2016 diagnosis was MDS with excess-blasts 1 (n=13, 19%), MDS with excess-blasts 2 (n=46, 67%), CMML (n=9, 13%) and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (n=1, 1%). In patients with MDS, the IPSS-M category was moderate high (n=4, 7%), high (n=19, 32%), and very high (n=36, 61%). The most common mutations were ASXL1 (n=29, 42%), RUNX1 (n=20, 29%), SRSF2 (n=17, 25%) TP53 (n=17, 25%, 15 being multi-hit TP53) and TET2 (n=14, 20%). The median number of cycles received per patient was 3 (1-25). The overall response rate by the IWG 2006 response criteria was 91% (63/69), with 31 (45%) patients achieving complete remission (CR), 20 (29%) patients achieving marrow CR (mCR) with hematological improvement (mCR-HI) and 12 (17%) patients achieving mCR. The median number of cycles to achieve first response and best response was 1 (1-3) and 1 (1-6), respectively. The overall response rate by the IWG 2023 response criteria was 81% (56/69), with 37 patients achieving CR (54%) and 19 patients (27%) achieving CR with limited count or partial hematologic recovery. The 4- and 8-week mortality was 1% and 4%, respectively. At the cutoff time 5 patients were remaining in the trial. The reasons for trial discontinuation were: undergoing HSCT (n=38, 55%), disease progression (n=11, 16%), death (n=8, 12%), patient or physician decision (n=5, 7%) and no response (n=2, 3%). Among patients who died while on study drugs, 4 patients died due to sepsis during cycles 2 and 3, two patients died during cycle 1 of cardiac arrest and pneumonia, and the remaining 2 patients died due to progressive dementia (cycle 5) and due to unknown reasons (cycle 7). Among patients undergoing HSCT (n=38), the median age was 68 (21-78), the median number of cycles before HSCT was 2 (1-11) and their best responses according to the IWG 2006 criteria were CR (47%), mCR (21%), mCR-HI (29%) and stable disease (3%). The median duration of response was not reached. After a median follow-up of 25 months, the median overall survival (OS) and the 2-year OS was 30 months and 55%, respectively. The event-free survival (EFS) and the 2-year EFS was 21 months and 48%, respectively. Patients with ASXL1mut had a median OS not reached (vs 18 months in patients with ASXL1wt, P=0.008). Patients with TP53mut had a median OS of 17 months (vs 31 months in patients with TP53wtP=ns). Myelosuppression was an expected effect of the combination. The median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery after the first cycle was 40 and 26 days, respectively. After first cycle, 82% of patients required Ven dose reduction in the subsequent cycles.Conclusion: The combination of DEC-C with Ven is a feasible combination, well-tolerated and with a high response and HSCT rate in high-risk MDS and CMML.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-237
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral decitabine/cedazuridine in combination with venetoclax in treatment-naïve high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Updates of a Phase 1/2 clinical trial

Farhad Ravandi, Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo, Kelly Sharon Chien, Koji Sasaki et al.
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Oral decitabine/cedazuridine in combination with venetoclax in treatment-naïve high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: Updates of a Phase 1/2 clinical trial

Farhad Ravandi, Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo, Kelly Sharon Chien, Koji Sasaki, Álex Bataller, Yesid Alvarado Valero, Harold Keer, Elias Joseph Jabbour, Ian Bouligny, Stephany Hendrickson, Sanam Loghavi, Rashmi Kanagal‐Shamanna, Alexandre Bazinet, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Ghayas C. Issa, Tapan Kadia, Lucia Masárová, Danielle Hammond, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Nicholas James Short
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The standard of care treatment for patients with high-risk myelodisplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are hypomethylating agents (HMA). Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for eligible patients with these diseases. Outcomes of HR-MDS and CMML with single-agent HMA are poor, warranting novel combinations to improve survival. We provide the results of a phase 1/2 clinical trial of the combination of oral decitabine/cedazuridine (DEC-C) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) in patients with untreated HR-MDS and CMML. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II open-label, single center clinical trial (NCT04655755). Eligibility criteria included patients with untreated HR-MDS (IPSS intermediate-2 or high, IPSS-R ³ 3. 5 or IPSS-M ³ 0) or CMML with excess blasts. The phase I portion (dose escalation) used a standard 3+3 study design to identify the recommended phase II dose (dose expansion). In this last phase efficacy was evaluated. Results: Between January 2021 and August 2024, 69 patients were enrolled. Nine patients were enrolled in the phase I portion: 3 patients received Ven 200mg on days 1-14 and 6 patients received 400mg on days 1-14, all with 5 days DEC-C 100/35mg on days 1-5. No dose-limiting toxicities registered, and the phase II dose was established as Ven 400mg days 1-14. The median age of the entire cohort was 71 years old (21-94), with 49 (70%) male patients. The WHO 2016 diagnosis was MDS with excess-blasts 1 (n=13, 19%), MDS with excess-blasts 2 (n=46, 67%), CMML (n=9, 13%) and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (n=1, 1%). In patients with MDS, the IPSS-M category was moderate high (n=4, 7%), high (n=19, 32%), and very high (n=36, 61%). The most common mutations were ASXL1 (n=29, 42%), RUNX1 (n=20, 29%), SRSF2 (n=17, 25%) TP53 (n=17, 25%, 15 being multi-hit TP53) and TET2 (n=14, 20%). The median number of cycles received per patient was 3 (1-25). The overall response rate by the IWG 2006 response criteria was 91% (63/69), with 31 (45%) patients achieving complete remission (CR), 20 (29%) patients achieving marrow CR (mCR) with hematological improvement (mCR-HI) and 12 (17%) patients achieving mCR. The median number of cycles to achieve first response and best response was 1 (1-3) and 1 (1-6), respectively. The overall response rate by the IWG 2023 response criteria was 81% (56/69), with 37 patients achieving CR (54%) and 19 patients (27%) achieving CR with limited count or partial hematologic recovery. The 4- and 8-week mortality was 1% and 4%, respectively. At the cutoff time 5 patients were remaining in the trial. The reasons for trial discontinuation were: undergoing HSCT (n=38, 55%), disease progression (n=11, 16%), death (n=8, 12%), patient or physician decision (n=5, 7%) and no response (n=2, 3%). Among patients who died while on study drugs, 4 patients died due to sepsis during cycles 2 and 3, two patients died during cycle 1 of cardiac arrest and pneumonia, and the remaining 2 patients died due to progressive dementia (cycle 5) and due to unknown reasons (cycle 7). Among patients undergoing HSCT (n=38), the median age was 68 (21-78), the median number of cycles before HSCT was 2 (1-11) and their best responses according to the IWG 2006 criteria were CR (47%), mCR (21%), mCR-HI (29%) and stable disease (3%). The median duration of response was not reached. After a median follow-up of 25 months, the median overall survival (OS) and the 2-year OS was 30 months and 55%, respectively. The event-free survival (EFS) and the 2-year EFS was 21 months and 48%, respectively. Patients with ASXL1mut had a median OS not reached (vs 18 months in patients with ASXL1wt, P=0.008). Patients with TP53mut had a median OS of 17 months (vs 31 months in patients with TP53wtP=ns). Myelosuppression was an expected effect of the combination. The median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery after the first cycle was 40 and 26 days, respectively. After first cycle, 82% of patients required Ven dose reduction in the subsequent cycles.Conclusion: The combination of DEC-C with Ven is a feasible combination, well-tolerated and with a high response and HSCT rate in high-risk MDS and CMML.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Taiho Oncology (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.