Estimating incidence and prevalence of polycythemia vera and associated eligibility for cytoreductive therapies in major US health plans

Abstract Introduction: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by elevated red blood cell production and associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, as well as potential progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Current treatment approaches for PV follow risk-adapted guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Leukemia Net (ELN), which stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk categories. This study aimed to estimate the number of incident and prevalent PV patients eligible for treatment per NCCN guidelines across major U.S. health plans. Methods: The literature was reviewed systematically to identify epidemiological estimates of prevalence and incidence of PV, determine the distribution of NCCN/ELN risk classifications, and assess eligibility for NCCN 1.2025-recommended cytoreductive therapies. Membership data for the eight largest U.S. commercial health plans were extracted from earnings releases, annual reports, and 10-K filings. These data were incorporated into Microsoft Excel to develop model inputs and calculate the base-case estimates of patients clinically eligible for NCCN-recommended therapies. Results: Nine sources were identified to provide data on PV epidemiology, ELN/NCCN risk classification distribution, and utilization of NCCN-recommended therapies through separate systematic searches. A mean of 1.17 (SD ± 0.29) incident and 50.94 (SD ± 5.01) prevalent polycythemia vera (PV) patients per 100,000 individuals were identified through literature. Across the eight health plans analyzed, the mean and median covered lives were 38,725,462 and 27,847,800, respectively. Among these health plans, an average of 453 (SD ± 385) incident and 19,728 (SD ± 16,771) prevalent PV patients were calculated. Of these, a mean of 323 (SD ± 274) incident high-risk and 14,057 (SD ± 11,949) prevalent high-risk PV patients were identified. The proportion of patients using cytoreductive therapy was 37.3%, corresponding to an average of 169 (SD ± 144) incident and 7,354 (SD ± 6,252) prevalent patients.Conclusion: There is significant variability in the estimates of both incident and prevalent PV populations eligible for NCCN-recommended cytoreductive therapies across U.S. commercial health plans, which may influence formulary policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-8202
Primary Topic
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating incidence and prevalence of polycythemia vera and associated eligibility for cytoreductive therapies in major US health plans

Alekhya Lavu, Craig Zimmerman, Paul D. Walden, Noemi Hummel
Blood
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Estimating incidence and prevalence of polycythemia vera and associated eligibility for cytoreductive therapies in major US health plans

Alekhya Lavu, Craig Zimmerman, Paul D. Walden, Noemi Hummel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Polycythemia vera (PV) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by elevated red blood cell production and associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, as well as potential progression to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Current treatment approaches for PV follow risk-adapted guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and the European Leukemia Net (ELN), which stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk categories. This study aimed to estimate the number of incident and prevalent PV patients eligible for treatment per NCCN guidelines across major U.S. health plans. Methods: The literature was reviewed systematically to identify epidemiological estimates of prevalence and incidence of PV, determine the distribution of NCCN/ELN risk classifications, and assess eligibility for NCCN 1.2025-recommended cytoreductive therapies. Membership data for the eight largest U.S. commercial health plans were extracted from earnings releases, annual reports, and 10-K filings. These data were incorporated into Microsoft Excel to develop model inputs and calculate the base-case estimates of patients clinically eligible for NCCN-recommended therapies. Results: Nine sources were identified to provide data on PV epidemiology, ELN/NCCN risk classification distribution, and utilization of NCCN-recommended therapies through separate systematic searches. A mean of 1.17 (SD ± 0.29) incident and 50.94 (SD ± 5.01) prevalent polycythemia vera (PV) patients per 100,000 individuals were identified through literature. Across the eight health plans analyzed, the mean and median covered lives were 38,725,462 and 27,847,800, respectively. Among these health plans, an average of 453 (SD ± 385) incident and 19,728 (SD ± 16,771) prevalent PV patients were calculated. Of these, a mean of 323 (SD ± 274) incident high-risk and 14,057 (SD ± 11,949) prevalent high-risk PV patients were identified. The proportion of patients using cytoreductive therapy was 37.3%, corresponding to an average of 169 (SD ± 144) incident and 7,354 (SD ± 6,252) prevalent patients.Conclusion: There is significant variability in the estimates of both incident and prevalent PV populations eligible for NCCN-recommended cytoreductive therapies across U.S. commercial health plans, which may influence formulary policy decisions.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of Andorra (AD), Forming Technologies (Canada) (CA), Theratechnologies (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.