The Competitive Standing of State-of-the-Art PLSS Technologies Given Prospective EVA Cadence

The Apollo-era Life Support System (LSS) utilized carbon dioxide (CO2) scrubbing canisters that were mechanically passive, reliable, and mass efficient in the context of the lunar mission parameters. Since Apollo, CO2 scrubbing technologies have been developed in an attempt to expand EVA capability. This paper will discuss the future applicability of these State-of-the-Art Primary Life Support Subsystem (PLSS) CO2 scrubbing approaches given the prospective cadence of manned exploration supporting commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) destinations, Lunar campaigns, and Martian campaigns. One of the primary metrics investigated is launched system mass to these destinations, a proxy for the operational cost effectiveness of each approach. Despite large investitures over the past 50 years into novel spacesuit life support approaches, flight-proven alternatives remain uniquely competitive and cost-effective options for certain mission regimes. By understanding the scope of future manned exploration and EVAs, we can prepare the most robust and efficient technical solution to meet humanity’s actual EVA need.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32865/2346/102868
Primary Topic
Space Exploration and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Competitive Standing of State-of-the-Art PLSS Technologies Given Prospective EVA Cadence

Greg Muller, Eric Valis, Daniel Probst, Jim DiSabito et al.
Space Exploration and Technology
article

The Competitive Standing of State-of-the-Art PLSS Technologies Given Prospective EVA Cadence

Greg Muller, Eric Valis, Daniel Probst, Jim DiSabito, Matt Buffa, Dave Graziosi, Luke Szrama
article en

Abstract

The Apollo-era Life Support System (LSS) utilized carbon dioxide (CO2) scrubbing canisters that were mechanically passive, reliable, and mass efficient in the context of the lunar mission parameters. Since Apollo, CO2 scrubbing technologies have been developed in an attempt to expand EVA capability. This paper will discuss the future applicability of these State-of-the-Art Primary Life Support Subsystem (PLSS) CO2 scrubbing approaches given the prospective cadence of manned exploration supporting commercial Low Earth Orbit (LEO) destinations, Lunar campaigns, and Martian campaigns. One of the primary metrics investigated is launched system mass to these destinations, a proxy for the operational cost effectiveness of each approach. Despite large investitures over the past 50 years into novel spacesuit life support approaches, flight-proven alternatives remain uniquely competitive and cost-effective options for certain mission regimes. By understanding the scope of future manned exploration and EVAs, we can prepare the most robust and efficient technical solution to meet humanity’s actual EVA need.

Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Space Exploration and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Competitive Standing of State-of-the-Art PLSS Technologies Given Prospective EVA Cadence — Greg Muller, Eric Valis, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS