Safety and outcomes of venetoclax initiation in patients with  AML and hyperleukocytosis

Abstract Introduction: Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents has improved outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. However, the FDA black box warning for tumor lysis syndrome, especially in patients with elevated white blood cell counts above 25,000/µL, raises concerns about its safe initiation. Hydroxyurea is often used to reduce WBC counts before starting venetoclax, but data on the true risk of TLS and patient outcomes remain limited. This study evaluates outcomes including TLS incidence in AML patients with hyperleukocytosis treated with venetoclax-containing regimens, with or without hydroxyurea pre-treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database included 107 centers and patients with AML and with WBC >25,000/µL from 2005 to 2025. Cohort A (n=145) received hydroxyurea for cytoreduction prior to treatment with hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) plus venetoclax. Cohort B (n=73) started directly on hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax without prior hydroxyurea. Diagnoses, treatments, and labs were identified using ICD-10 codes. Outcomes included overall survival, remission, relapse, and incidence of TLS. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results: Median overall survival was 168 days in Cohort A and 303 days in Cohort B (p=0.056; hazard ratio 1.56; 95% CI 0.99–2.46), indicating a non-significant trend favoring direct initiation without hydroxyurea. Death occurred in 48 and 31 patients in Cohorts A and B, respectively with a hazard ratio of 1.555 (95% CI 0.985-2.455), p value 0.821 indicating no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups. Rates of remission and relapse were similar between groups. TLS occurred in 19 patients in Cohort A and 12 patients in Cohort B. Median survival after TLS diagnosis was short, at 5 days for Cohort A and 13 days for Cohort B (hazard ratio 1.45; p=0.55), with no significant difference in TLS-related outcomes between the cohorts. Conclusion: Initiation of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in AML patients with WBC counts over 25,000/µL does not appear to increase the risk of TLS whether or not hydroxyurea is used for cytoreduction. While TLS remains a serious complication with poor short-term survival, its incidence was low and comparable between cohorts. Our findings suggest that venetoclax can be safely initiated patients with AML and elevated WBC count without mandatory leukoreduction prior to use, although close monitoring for TLS is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3410
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and outcomes of venetoclax initiation in patients with  AML and hyperleukocytosis

Hiba M. Khan, Lauren Veltri, Salah Ud Din Safi, Sanjana Nethagani et al.
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Safety and outcomes of venetoclax initiation in patients with  AML and hyperleukocytosis

Hiba M. Khan, Lauren Veltri, Salah Ud Din Safi, Sanjana Nethagani, Nolan Holley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents has improved outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia. However, the FDA black box warning for tumor lysis syndrome, especially in patients with elevated white blood cell counts above 25,000/µL, raises concerns about its safe initiation. Hydroxyurea is often used to reduce WBC counts before starting venetoclax, but data on the true risk of TLS and patient outcomes remain limited. This study evaluates outcomes including TLS incidence in AML patients with hyperleukocytosis treated with venetoclax-containing regimens, with or without hydroxyurea pre-treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database included 107 centers and patients with AML and with WBC >25,000/µL from 2005 to 2025. Cohort A (n=145) received hydroxyurea for cytoreduction prior to treatment with hypomethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine) plus venetoclax. Cohort B (n=73) started directly on hypomethylating agents plus venetoclax without prior hydroxyurea. Diagnoses, treatments, and labs were identified using ICD-10 codes. Outcomes included overall survival, remission, relapse, and incidence of TLS. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Results: Median overall survival was 168 days in Cohort A and 303 days in Cohort B (p=0.056; hazard ratio 1.56; 95% CI 0.99–2.46), indicating a non-significant trend favoring direct initiation without hydroxyurea. Death occurred in 48 and 31 patients in Cohorts A and B, respectively with a hazard ratio of 1.555 (95% CI 0.985-2.455), p value 0.821 indicating no statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups. Rates of remission and relapse were similar between groups. TLS occurred in 19 patients in Cohort A and 12 patients in Cohort B. Median survival after TLS diagnosis was short, at 5 days for Cohort A and 13 days for Cohort B (hazard ratio 1.45; p=0.55), with no significant difference in TLS-related outcomes between the cohorts. Conclusion: Initiation of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in AML patients with WBC counts over 25,000/µL does not appear to increase the risk of TLS whether or not hydroxyurea is used for cytoreduction. While TLS remains a serious complication with poor short-term survival, its incidence was low and comparable between cohorts. Our findings suggest that venetoclax can be safely initiated patients with AML and elevated WBC count without mandatory leukoreduction prior to use, although close monitoring for TLS is essential.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
West Virginia University (US), West Virginia University Hospitals (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.