Peanut yield and grade prediction in Georgia, USA: integrating management, climate, and remote sensing data with explainable AI

• Compared 18 ML models to predict peanut yield and grade in Georgia. • Used data from 200+ fields, including management, weather, soil, and remote sensing. • Cubist and SVM models had the most accurate predictions overall. • Management + soil best predicted yield; management + remote sensing best for grade. • SHAP analysis revealed key factors: irrigation, soil, and vegetation indices. Predicting agricultural yields and quality is essential for optimizing decision-making, food security, economic planning, and resource management. Although many studies have compared algorithms or variables for predicting yield or quality, the information on peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is limited. To address this, our study aims to: a) compare the performance of various machine learning (ML) models for predicting peanut yield and grade across diverse variable groups (GV); b) select the most accurate ML and GV combination; c) identify the most important factors driving outcomes using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP); and d) assess the spatial generalization of the best models using a Leave-One-Site-Year-Out (LOSYO) cross-validation. A total of 540 ML were trained comparing 18 different ML with 15 GV, being these: management (M), weather (W), soil (S), and remote sensing (R) datasets and their combination. Management information was recovered from surveys performed from 2017 to 2019 on more than 200 peanut farms from Georgia, USA and open-source related data was retrieved. Results indicated that Cubist-rule and support vector machine performed better than other models achieving the lowest root mean squared error values (816 kg ha −1 for yield, 1.52 for grade). Among the different GV, M + S and M + R performed better than others for yield and grade, respectively. SHAP revealed irrigation, geographic location, and soil properties as key drivers of yield, whereas vegetation indices and management decisions influenced grade. The study underscores the value of interpretable ML models for optimizing peanut production under variable environmental conditions, offering actionable insights for farmers and agronomists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.111270
Primary Topic
Peanut Plant Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peanut yield and grade prediction in Georgia, USA: integrating management, climate, and remote sensing data with explainable AI

Anish Bhattarai, R. Scott Tubbs, Cristiane Pilon, Gonzalo Joel Scarpin et al.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Peanut Plant Research Studies
article

Peanut yield and grade prediction in Georgia, USA: integrating management, climate, and remote sensing data with explainable AI

Anish Bhattarai, R. Scott Tubbs, Cristiane Pilon, Gonzalo Joel Scarpin, W. Scott Monfort, Leonardo M. Bastos, Amrinder Jakhar, Amandeep Kaur Dhaliwal, Sara Beth Studstill
article en

Abstract

• Compared 18 ML models to predict peanut yield and grade in Georgia. • Used data from 200+ fields, including management, weather, soil, and remote sensing. • Cubist and SVM models had the most accurate predictions overall. • Management + soil best predicted yield; management + remote sensing best for grade. • SHAP analysis revealed key factors: irrigation, soil, and vegetation indices. Predicting agricultural yields and quality is essential for optimizing decision-making, food security, economic planning, and resource management. Although many studies have compared algorithms or variables for predicting yield or quality, the information on peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) is limited. To address this, our study aims to: a) compare the performance of various machine learning (ML) models for predicting peanut yield and grade across diverse variable groups (GV); b) select the most accurate ML and GV combination; c) identify the most important factors driving outcomes using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP); and d) assess the spatial generalization of the best models using a Leave-One-Site-Year-Out (LOSYO) cross-validation. A total of 540 ML were trained comparing 18 different ML with 15 GV, being these: management (M), weather (W), soil (S), and remote sensing (R) datasets and their combination. Management information was recovered from surveys performed from 2017 to 2019 on more than 200 peanut farms from Georgia, USA and open-source related data was retrieved. Results indicated that Cubist-rule and support vector machine performed better than other models achieving the lowest root mean squared error values (816 kg ha −1 for yield, 1.52 for grade). Among the different GV, M + S and M + R performed better than others for yield and grade, respectively. SHAP revealed irrigation, geographic location, and soil properties as key drivers of yield, whereas vegetation indices and management decisions influenced grade. The study underscores the value of interpretable ML models for optimizing peanut production under variable environmental conditions, offering actionable insights for farmers and agronomists.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 241
Bayer (United States) (US), University of Georgia (US), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Peanut Plant Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.