Impact of vitamin d deficiency on quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with multi-organ involvement, including renal impairment, anemia, and particularly skeletal complications. Vitamin D plays a crucial role in bone metabolism by promoting calcium absorption and facilitating bone remodeling. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency is common among MM patients and may be associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including reduced survival. However, routine assessment of vitamin D status is not currently incorporated into standard laboratory evaluations for MM patients in Thailand. Objective: To determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, identify associated risk factors, and evaluate the impact of vitamin D status on clinical outcomes, including bone morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MM. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study between July 2024 and June 2025 at the outpatient Hematology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MM who had not received vitamin D supplementation were enrolled. Patients with a history of other malignancies were excluded. Treatment regimens followed national guidelines, and bisphosphonates were used when not contraindicated. At enrollment, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were measured. Participants completed a vitamin D risk factor questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 for QoL assessment. Demographic data, bone morbidity events, and PFS were retrospectively obtained from medical records. The primary outcome was the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D level below 20 ng/mL. Secondary outcomes included the bone morbidity (compression fractures and pathologic fractures on imaging), PFS, QoL scores, and associated risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. PFS was defined as the time from initiation of treatment to documented disease progression as determined by either clinical or biochemical relapse. Results: A total of 66 patients were enrolled with a median age of 62.76 ± 10.55 years; 42% were male. By International Staging System (ISS) staging, 13.64% had stage I, 25.76% stage II, and 60.60% stage III disease. All patients received proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory agents. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 28.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.00 - 41.03). Patients in the deficiency group were significantly younger(median: 57.68 ± 12.60 years vs. 64.81 ± 8.96 years; p = 0.0119), while other baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable. Patients with deficiency had significantly worse QoL scores (median: 34 vs. 27; p = 0.0017). Compression fractures were more common in the deficient group (52.63% vs. 27.66%; p = 0.054), suggesting a trend toward increased bone fragility, although the rates of pathologic fractures did not differ significantly (10.53% vs. 6.38%; p = 0.621). Age was identified as an independent risk factor for vitamin D deficiency (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88 - 0.99; p = 0.022), indicating that older age was associated with a lower risk of deficiency. Among the 30 patients who experienced relapse (45.45%), patients with vitamin D deficiency patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to those without deficiency (median: 9.71 months, interquartile range [IQR] 5.52 - 22.18] vs. 19.67 months, IQR 16.56 - 40.01; p= 0.0147). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency was present in nearly one-third of MM patients and was significantly associated with impaired QoL and shorter PFS in relapsed patients. These findings support the potential importance of incorporating routine vitamin D screening and supplementation into the management of patients with MM. Routine screening may also help mitigate skeletal complications, which remain a major cause of morbidity in MM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-4571
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of vitamin d deficiency on quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

Lalita Norasetthada, Sasinee Hantrakool, Pokpong Piriyakhuntorn, Chatree Chai‐Adisaksopha et al.
Blood
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Impact of vitamin d deficiency on quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma

Lalita Norasetthada, Sasinee Hantrakool, Pokpong Piriyakhuntorn, Chatree Chai‐Adisaksopha, Teerachat Punnachet, Nonthakorn Hantrakun, Ekarat Rattarittamrong, Piangrawee Niprapan, Thanawat Rattanathammethee, Adisak Tantiworawit, Sirichai Srichairatanakool, Kawita Kitichotkul
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy with multi-organ involvement, including renal impairment, anemia, and particularly skeletal complications. Vitamin D plays a crucial role in bone metabolism by promoting calcium absorption and facilitating bone remodeling. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency is common among MM patients and may be associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including reduced survival. However, routine assessment of vitamin D status is not currently incorporated into standard laboratory evaluations for MM patients in Thailand. Objective: To determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, identify associated risk factors, and evaluate the impact of vitamin D status on clinical outcomes, including bone morbidity, quality of life (QoL), and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MM. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study between July 2024 and June 2025 at the outpatient Hematology Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of MM who had not received vitamin D supplementation were enrolled. Patients with a history of other malignancies were excluded. Treatment regimens followed national guidelines, and bisphosphonates were used when not contraindicated. At enrollment, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were measured. Participants completed a vitamin D risk factor questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 for QoL assessment. Demographic data, bone morbidity events, and PFS were retrospectively obtained from medical records. The primary outcome was the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, defined as a serum 25(OH)D level below 20 ng/mL. Secondary outcomes included the bone morbidity (compression fractures and pathologic fractures on imaging), PFS, QoL scores, and associated risk factors for vitamin D deficiency, analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. PFS was defined as the time from initiation of treatment to documented disease progression as determined by either clinical or biochemical relapse. Results: A total of 66 patients were enrolled with a median age of 62.76 ± 10.55 years; 42% were male. By International Staging System (ISS) staging, 13.64% had stage I, 25.76% stage II, and 60.60% stage III disease. All patients received proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulatory agents. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 28.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.00 - 41.03). Patients in the deficiency group were significantly younger(median: 57.68 ± 12.60 years vs. 64.81 ± 8.96 years; p = 0.0119), while other baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were comparable. Patients with deficiency had significantly worse QoL scores (median: 34 vs. 27; p = 0.0017). Compression fractures were more common in the deficient group (52.63% vs. 27.66%; p = 0.054), suggesting a trend toward increased bone fragility, although the rates of pathologic fractures did not differ significantly (10.53% vs. 6.38%; p = 0.621). Age was identified as an independent risk factor for vitamin D deficiency (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88 - 0.99; p = 0.022), indicating that older age was associated with a lower risk of deficiency. Among the 30 patients who experienced relapse (45.45%), patients with vitamin D deficiency patients had significantly shorter PFS compared to those without deficiency (median: 9.71 months, interquartile range [IQR] 5.52 - 22.18] vs. 19.67 months, IQR 16.56 - 40.01; p= 0.0147). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency was present in nearly one-third of MM patients and was significantly associated with impaired QoL and shorter PFS in relapsed patients. These findings support the potential importance of incorporating routine vitamin D screening and supplementation into the management of patients with MM. Routine screening may also help mitigate skeletal complications, which remain a major cause of morbidity in MM.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.