Central nervous system involvement in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort study from the spanish geltamo group

Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon but clinically significant event, often associated with poor prognosis. Prior studies have offered important insights, yet data from large, unselected real-world populations remain scarce. We report findings from one of the largest multicenter cohorts of MCL patients in Spain, aimed at characterizing CNS involvement and comparing clinical outcomes—including treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)—between patients with and without CNS infiltration. Patients and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 1,162 MCL patients diagnosed in Spain (GELTAMO-MCL-2022). Among them, 60 patients (5.2%) had CNS involvement, either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease, while 1,102 had no evidence of CNS infiltration. Data from participating centers encompassed baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, response rates, and survival outcomes. PFS and OS were analyzed and compared between groups. Results The crude incidence of CNS involvement was 5.2%, with 1.4% at the time of diagnosis. For patients who developed CNS relapse later (not at diagnosis), the median time from initial diagnosis to CNS involvement was 15.10 months (IQR 7.47–34.14). CNS localization was leptomeningeal in 70%, parenchymal in 16%, and both in 14%. Baseline characteristics, including established high-risk features, were compared between patients with and without CNS involvement. Sex distribution (male 73% in both; p=0.9), age >65 years (47% vs. 53%; p=0.2), and extranodal disease (p=0.3) were similar between groups. In contrast, high-risk baseline features such as high-risk MIPI (77% vs. 44%; p=0.001), blastoid/pleomorphic variant (45% vs. 16%; p=0.001), and Ki-67 >30% (80% vs. 49%; p=0.001) were significantly more frequent in patients with CNS involvement. First-line intensive regimens including high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) were given to 48% with CNS involvement versus 36% without (p=ns). BTK inhibitors were used as a frontline treatment in 8% overall, but none of the CNS patients. Early progression of disease (ePOD) was more frequent with CNS involvement (72% vs. 51%; p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, CNS involvement at diagnosis was an independent adverse factor for OS (HR 3.25; 95% CI: 1.62–6.52; p<0.001) and PFS (HR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.45–3.01; p=0.001). Other independent predictors of OS were age >65 (HR 2.04; p<0.001), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.72; p=0.003), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.63; p=0.001). For PFS, age (HR 1.39; p=0.016), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.45; p=0.014), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.39; p=0.007) were significant; blastoid morphology showed a trend toward significance (HR 1.30; p=0.056). Treatment with HIDAC was not an independent predictor of survival, neither for OS nor for PFS. Median OS from diagnosis was 1.41 years (95% CI: 1.19–NA) for patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis (n=16) versus 7.5 years (95% CI: 6.92–8.4) for those without (p=0.001). Median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI: 2.89–NA) versus 42.1 months (95% CI: 36.6–47.0), respectively (p=0.012). In patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis, high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) did not significantly improve OS or PFS. Median OS was 1.41 years with HIDAC and 1.30 years without it (HR 2.08; p=0.277), while median PFS was 16.4 vs 9.6 months, respectively (HR 1.51; p=0.504). Similarly, first-line consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation had no significant impact on survival. When calculated from the time of CNS involvement, patients with CNS disease at diagnosis had significantly worse outcomes compared to those with CNS relapse, with a median PFS of 3.5 vs 18.0 months (HR 3.00; 95% CI: 1.36–6.59; p=0.006) and median OS of 1.5 vs 0.19 years (HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.36–6.69; p=0.006). Conclusions In this large Spanish multicenter cohort, CNS involvement in MCL—although a rare complication both at diagnosis and at relapse—was associated with markedly poorer PFS and OS. It remained an independent adverse prognostic factor alongside age, high-risk MIPI, and Ki-67. CNS infiltration at diagnosis was the strongest predictor of poor outcome, while occurrence during disease evolution conferred an even worse prognosis. These findings highlight the need for early identification and tailored therapeutic approaches for high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3585
Primary Topic
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Central nervous system involvement in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort study from the spanish geltamo group

Rosalía Alonso, Fátima de la Cruz Vicente, Amparo Avaría, Ana Marín‐Niebla et al.
Blood
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Central nervous system involvement in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A retrospective multicenter cohort study from the spanish geltamo group

Rosalía Alonso, Fátima de la Cruz Vicente, Amparo Avaría, Ana Marín‐Niebla, Daniel García Belmonte, Carlos Grande, Antonio M. Gutierrez, Ana Muntañola Prat, Pau Abrisqueta, Eduardo Ríos, Paola Villafuerte Gutiérrez, Marina Gómez-Llobell, Ana Jiménez Ubieto, António Campos, Ana Saus Carreres, Víctor Navarro Garcés, Mariana Bastos‐Oreiro, Alicia Roldán, José‐Ángel Hernández‐Rivas, Alejandro Martı́n, Alba Cabirta, Eva M. González-Barca, Eva Giné, B. de la Cruz Benito, Ana Maria Garcia-Noblejas Moya, Sonia González de Villambrosía, Blanca Sánchez‐González, Raúl Córdoba, Hugo Luzardo, Juan‐Manuel Sancho, Lucía Villalón Blanco, Concepción Nicolás, Emilia Pardal De La Mano, Sandra Suarez Ordoñez, Amanda Perez, Juan Carlos Caballero, Eva Donato, Silvia Rocio Verdesoto Cozzarelli, Marta Canelo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon but clinically significant event, often associated with poor prognosis. Prior studies have offered important insights, yet data from large, unselected real-world populations remain scarce. We report findings from one of the largest multicenter cohorts of MCL patients in Spain, aimed at characterizing CNS involvement and comparing clinical outcomes—including treatment response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)—between patients with and without CNS infiltration. Patients and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included 1,162 MCL patients diagnosed in Spain (GELTAMO-MCL-2022). Among them, 60 patients (5.2%) had CNS involvement, either at diagnosis or during the course of the disease, while 1,102 had no evidence of CNS infiltration. Data from participating centers encompassed baseline characteristics, treatment approaches, response rates, and survival outcomes. PFS and OS were analyzed and compared between groups. Results The crude incidence of CNS involvement was 5.2%, with 1.4% at the time of diagnosis. For patients who developed CNS relapse later (not at diagnosis), the median time from initial diagnosis to CNS involvement was 15.10 months (IQR 7.47–34.14). CNS localization was leptomeningeal in 70%, parenchymal in 16%, and both in 14%. Baseline characteristics, including established high-risk features, were compared between patients with and without CNS involvement. Sex distribution (male 73% in both; p=0.9), age >65 years (47% vs. 53%; p=0.2), and extranodal disease (p=0.3) were similar between groups. In contrast, high-risk baseline features such as high-risk MIPI (77% vs. 44%; p=0.001), blastoid/pleomorphic variant (45% vs. 16%; p=0.001), and Ki-67 >30% (80% vs. 49%; p=0.001) were significantly more frequent in patients with CNS involvement. First-line intensive regimens including high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) were given to 48% with CNS involvement versus 36% without (p=ns). BTK inhibitors were used as a frontline treatment in 8% overall, but none of the CNS patients. Early progression of disease (ePOD) was more frequent with CNS involvement (72% vs. 51%; p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, CNS involvement at diagnosis was an independent adverse factor for OS (HR 3.25; 95% CI: 1.62–6.52; p<0.001) and PFS (HR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.45–3.01; p=0.001). Other independent predictors of OS were age >65 (HR 2.04; p<0.001), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.72; p=0.003), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.63; p=0.001). For PFS, age (HR 1.39; p=0.016), high-risk MIPI (HR 1.45; p=0.014), and Ki-67 >30% (HR 1.39; p=0.007) were significant; blastoid morphology showed a trend toward significance (HR 1.30; p=0.056). Treatment with HIDAC was not an independent predictor of survival, neither for OS nor for PFS. Median OS from diagnosis was 1.41 years (95% CI: 1.19–NA) for patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis (n=16) versus 7.5 years (95% CI: 6.92–8.4) for those without (p=0.001). Median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI: 2.89–NA) versus 42.1 months (95% CI: 36.6–47.0), respectively (p=0.012). In patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis, high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) did not significantly improve OS or PFS. Median OS was 1.41 years with HIDAC and 1.30 years without it (HR 2.08; p=0.277), while median PFS was 16.4 vs 9.6 months, respectively (HR 1.51; p=0.504). Similarly, first-line consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation had no significant impact on survival. When calculated from the time of CNS involvement, patients with CNS disease at diagnosis had significantly worse outcomes compared to those with CNS relapse, with a median PFS of 3.5 vs 18.0 months (HR 3.00; 95% CI: 1.36–6.59; p=0.006) and median OS of 1.5 vs 0.19 years (HR 3.02; 95% CI: 1.36–6.69; p=0.006). Conclusions In this large Spanish multicenter cohort, CNS involvement in MCL—although a rare complication both at diagnosis and at relapse—was associated with markedly poorer PFS and OS. It remained an independent adverse prognostic factor alongside age, high-risk MIPI, and Ki-67. CNS infiltration at diagnosis was the strongest predictor of poor outcome, while occurrence during disease evolution conferred an even worse prognosis. These findings highlight the need for early identification and tailored therapeutic approaches for high-risk patients.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Hospital Universitario La Paz (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Hospital La Luz (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (ES), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (ES), Hospital Universitario de Getafe (ES), Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias (ES), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Fundación Marques de Valdecilla (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset (ES), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Hospital de Sant Joan Despí Moisès Broggi (ES), Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Hospital Universitario de Valme (ES), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (ES), Hospital Virgen del Puerto (ES), Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.