Luspatercept response predictors in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Abstract Background: Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that targets TGF-β superfamily ligands to enhance late-stage erythropoiesis. It has shown superior efficacy over erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) and placebo in phase 2 and 3 trials. It is FDA-approved for the treatment of anemia in patients (pts) with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), particularly in pts with ring sideroblasts (RS) or SF3B1 mutation. However, predictors of response beyond RS/SF3B1 remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult pts with LR-MDS treated with luspatercept between 2016–2025 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Pts were classified into 3 transfusion burden (TB) groups per IWG 2018 criteria: non–transfusion dependent (NTD; 0 RBC units in 16 weeks), low TB (LTB; 3–7 RBC units in 16 weeks), and high TB (HTB; ≥8 RBC units in 16 weeks or ≥4 in 8 weeks). Response was defined as sustained hemoglobin (Hb) increase (≥1.5 g/dL) in NTD, transfusion independence (TI) (≥8 weeks) in LTB, and either TI or ≥50% transfusion reduction in HTB, lasting ≥16 weeks. We collected baseline clinical characteristics, prior therapies, cytogenetics, and mutational data. Logistic regression identified predictors of response; overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 104 response-evaluable pts, median age was 71.2 (range, 34–90) yrs, and 63% were male. Median baseline Hb was 8.5 g/dL (7.8–9.2), platelets (PLT) 193 × 10⁹/L (97–293), ANC 2.3 × 10³/µL (1.4–3.3), and median IPSS-R score 2.5 (2.0–3.5). Common mutations were SF3B1 (39%), TET2 (25%), ASXL1 (17%), DNMT3A (12%), U2AF1 (8%), and SRSF2 (6%). Response defined by the IWG 2018 criteria was observed in 52 pts (50%). Among these, 22.1% achieved a Hb increase of ≥1.5 g/dL in the NTD category, 25.9% attained TI in the LTB category, and 1.9% exhibited a >50% reduction in the HTB category. Responders had significantly higher baseline Hb (8.7 vs 8.2 g/dL, P = 0.04) and PLT (237 vs 135 ×10⁹/L, P = 0.03) with a trend towards lower median RS% (30% vs 51%, P = 0.06) and EPO level (52 vs 83 mIU/mL, P = 0.15). There was no difference in baseline ANC, marrow blasts, fibrosis, IPSS-R/IPSS-M scores. Cytogenetics, including del5q, -7/del(7q), +8, -20/del(20q), and complex karyotype, were not associated with response. Among 84 pts with NGS data, no mutation was significantly predictive. Trends were noted for U2AF1 (OR 4.23, 95% CI 0.96–29.41; P = 0.08), TET2 (OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.85–5.28; P = 0.12), and SF3B1 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.77–3.81; P = 0.19). Response rates differed significantly by TB category (NTD, LTB, HTB; P < 0.01). Prior hypomethylating agents (HMAs) exposure was significantly associated with lower response rates (25% vs 75% in HMA-naïve, P = 0.01). There was no significant association with prior ESA or lenalidomide use. First-line luspatercept showed a trend towards better response (p=0.09). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for key clinical covariates, including age, IPSS-R, baseline Hb, PLT, and line of therapy, HTB (OR 0.08; 95% CI, 0.008–0.59; P = 0.02) and higher RS% (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–0.99; P = 0.04) independently predicted reduced odds of response. In a subgroup analysis of SF3B1 wild-type pts (N = 37), RS% (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–0.99; P = 0.04), and earlier line of therapy was significantly associated with better response (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02–0.63; P = 0.02). Prior HMA exposure trended toward reduced response (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.03–0.92; P = 0.06), while higher Hb showed a positive trend (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.03–4.76; P = 0.06). Other variables, including IPSS-R, EPO levels, and co-mutations, were not predictive. In the SF3B1-mutated subgroup (N = 48), TI at baseline was the only significant predictor of response to luspatercept (OR 7.20, 95% CI: 1.20–62.51; P = 0.04). Responders had longer OS (median not reached vs 89 weeks; P < 0.01). One- and two-year OS rates were 85% and 82% in responders versus 74% and 34% in non-responders, respectively. In univariate analysis, attaining response was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.01; P = 0.05). Conclusions: Patients who respond to luspatercept tend to have lower baseline transfusion burden, lower RS%, and no prior HMA therapy. Attainment of response was associated with significantly improved overall survival. Prospective studies are needed to validate these predictors and inform optimal sequencing of luspatercept in LR-MDS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5648
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Luspatercept response predictors in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Courtney Denton Dinardo, Wei‐Ying Jen, Tapan Mahendra Kadia, Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo et al.
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Luspatercept response predictors in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Courtney Denton Dinardo, Wei‐Ying Jen, Tapan Mahendra Kadia, Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo, Kelly Sharon Chien, Koji Sasaki, Álex Bataller, Naval Guastad Daver, Emmanuel Almanza, Ian Bouligny, Musa E. Yilmaz, Gautam M. Borthakur, Vanthana Bharathi, Ghayas C. Issa, Alexandre Bazinet, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Danielle Hammond, Niranjan Khaire
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that targets TGF-β superfamily ligands to enhance late-stage erythropoiesis. It has shown superior efficacy over erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) and placebo in phase 2 and 3 trials. It is FDA-approved for the treatment of anemia in patients (pts) with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (LR-MDS), particularly in pts with ring sideroblasts (RS) or SF3B1 mutation. However, predictors of response beyond RS/SF3B1 remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult pts with LR-MDS treated with luspatercept between 2016–2025 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Pts were classified into 3 transfusion burden (TB) groups per IWG 2018 criteria: non–transfusion dependent (NTD; 0 RBC units in 16 weeks), low TB (LTB; 3–7 RBC units in 16 weeks), and high TB (HTB; ≥8 RBC units in 16 weeks or ≥4 in 8 weeks). Response was defined as sustained hemoglobin (Hb) increase (≥1.5 g/dL) in NTD, transfusion independence (TI) (≥8 weeks) in LTB, and either TI or ≥50% transfusion reduction in HTB, lasting ≥16 weeks. We collected baseline clinical characteristics, prior therapies, cytogenetics, and mutational data. Logistic regression identified predictors of response; overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 104 response-evaluable pts, median age was 71.2 (range, 34–90) yrs, and 63% were male. Median baseline Hb was 8.5 g/dL (7.8–9.2), platelets (PLT) 193 × 10⁹/L (97–293), ANC 2.3 × 10³/µL (1.4–3.3), and median IPSS-R score 2.5 (2.0–3.5). Common mutations were SF3B1 (39%), TET2 (25%), ASXL1 (17%), DNMT3A (12%), U2AF1 (8%), and SRSF2 (6%). Response defined by the IWG 2018 criteria was observed in 52 pts (50%). Among these, 22.1% achieved a Hb increase of ≥1.5 g/dL in the NTD category, 25.9% attained TI in the LTB category, and 1.9% exhibited a >50% reduction in the HTB category. Responders had significantly higher baseline Hb (8.7 vs 8.2 g/dL, P = 0.04) and PLT (237 vs 135 ×10⁹/L, P = 0.03) with a trend towards lower median RS% (30% vs 51%, P = 0.06) and EPO level (52 vs 83 mIU/mL, P = 0.15). There was no difference in baseline ANC, marrow blasts, fibrosis, IPSS-R/IPSS-M scores. Cytogenetics, including del5q, -7/del(7q), +8, -20/del(20q), and complex karyotype, were not associated with response. Among 84 pts with NGS data, no mutation was significantly predictive. Trends were noted for U2AF1 (OR 4.23, 95% CI 0.96–29.41; P = 0.08), TET2 (OR 2.07, 95% CI 0.85–5.28; P = 0.12), and SF3B1 (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.77–3.81; P = 0.19). Response rates differed significantly by TB category (NTD, LTB, HTB; P < 0.01). Prior hypomethylating agents (HMAs) exposure was significantly associated with lower response rates (25% vs 75% in HMA-naïve, P = 0.01). There was no significant association with prior ESA or lenalidomide use. First-line luspatercept showed a trend towards better response (p=0.09). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for key clinical covariates, including age, IPSS-R, baseline Hb, PLT, and line of therapy, HTB (OR 0.08; 95% CI, 0.008–0.59; P = 0.02) and higher RS% (OR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–0.99; P = 0.04) independently predicted reduced odds of response. In a subgroup analysis of SF3B1 wild-type pts (N = 37), RS% (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–0.99; P = 0.04), and earlier line of therapy was significantly associated with better response (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.02–0.63; P = 0.02). Prior HMA exposure trended toward reduced response (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.03–0.92; P = 0.06), while higher Hb showed a positive trend (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.03–4.76; P = 0.06). Other variables, including IPSS-R, EPO levels, and co-mutations, were not predictive. In the SF3B1-mutated subgroup (N = 48), TI at baseline was the only significant predictor of response to luspatercept (OR 7.20, 95% CI: 1.20–62.51; P = 0.04). Responders had longer OS (median not reached vs 89 weeks; P < 0.01). One- and two-year OS rates were 85% and 82% in responders versus 74% and 34% in non-responders, respectively. In univariate analysis, attaining response was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19–1.01; P = 0.05). Conclusions: Patients who respond to luspatercept tend to have lower baseline transfusion burden, lower RS%, and no prior HMA therapy. Attainment of response was associated with significantly improved overall survival. Prospective studies are needed to validate these predictors and inform optimal sequencing of luspatercept in LR-MDS.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.