Correlative biomarker analyses of etentamig in patients with Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) at optimal dose support its potential to maximize T-cell activity with rapid and transient proinflammatory cytokine responses
Abstract Background Etentamig is a second-generation B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody that has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Etentamig possesses a unique combination of 2 high-affinity BCMA binding domains, coupled to a low-affinity CD3 binding domain that have been shown to reduce the negative impact of soluble BCMA (sBCMA), decrease risk for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and drive sustained T-cell activation with reduced immune exhaustion in preclinical models of MM (Blood 2023;142 [suppl 1]:4666). Here, we describe correlative biomarker analyses from Phase 1 (NCT03933735) and Phase 1b (NCT05650632) clinical trials of etentamig in RRMM designed to assess the impact of sBCMA on clinical response and pharmacodynamic changes in proinflammatory cytokines, and T-cell redistribution, activation, proliferation, and exhaustion. Methods Peripheral blood and serum samples from patients with RRMM enrolled in Phase 1 and Phase 1b open-label studies who received etentamig monotherapy were collected at baseline, on treatment, and at disease progression. The Phase 1b study consisted of dose-optimization (DO) and dose-expansion (DE) phases. During DO, patients received a single step-up dose (SUD) of intravenous etentamig (2 or 4 mg) on Cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, followed by the target dose of 60 mg on D4. In DE, based on DO findings, patients received the recommended etentamig SUD (2 mg) on C1D1, followed by 60 mg on D4 with modified dexamethasone predosing. Samples were analyzed by flow cytometry for immune cell populations, Luminex® for cytokines, and electrochemiluminescence for sBCMA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) at baseline and on-treatment were subjected to single-cell Cellular Indexing of Transcriptomes and Epitopes sequencing (scCITEseq) and single-cell T-cell receptors (scTCR) / B-cell receptors clonality analyses. Results While baseline serum sBCMA levels did not correlate with clinical response to etentamig at the selected dose level of 60 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) with 2 mg SUD, a reduction in sBCMA levels over time was associated with best International Myeloma Working Group response. Etentamig treatment led to a rapid and transient increase of proinflammatory cytokines and promoted T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation. Maximum reduction in peak levels of CRS-related cytokines, including (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor–a), were observed in DE compared with DO and 60 mg Q4W without SUD. Peak induction levels of proinflammatory cytokines during C1 correlated with occurrence of CRS (≥Grade [G] 1) as well as clinical response across dose levels. A modified dexamethasone premedication schedule of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort for C1 resulted in significantly reduced baseline levels of IL-6 and key macrophage-associated cytokine/chemokines (eg, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-3 beta). Incidence of CRS was lowest in the 2 mg/60 mg Q4W cohort (26% G1, 4% G2, 0% ≥G3). Higher T-cell to myeloma cell ratio in BMMCs at baseline correlated with better response to etentamig. scCITEseq and scTCR analysis revealed that at baseline, responders also had greater CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic activities, increased TCR clonality, and elevated inflammatory signatures in T-cells from both peripheral blood and bone marrow. Etentamig at a dosage of 60 mg Q4W resulted in significant clonal expansion of CD8+ effector T-cells and enhanced gene expression signatures related to activation and cytotoxicity in both CD8+ T effector and natural killer cells. Along treatment cycles, responders maintained their T-cell fitness, high clonality, and low T-cell exhaustion levels. Frequency of baseline CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell exhaustion (programmed cell death receptor 1+/ T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 +) did not impact clinical response at optimal dose level of 2 mg/60 mg Q4W etentamig. Conclusions Responses to etentamig were independent of baseline sBCMA levels and resulted in rapid and transient proinflammatory cytokine production that promoted robust T-cell redistribution, activation, and proliferation indicating that the optimal dose of etentamig (2 mg/60 mg Q4W) maximizes its clinical potential as a convenient, safe, and effective therapy for MM.
Authors
- John McKay
- Katja Christina Weisel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-6614)
- Ravi Vij (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8795-3610)
- Anders Svensson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0880-1853)
- Anita D’Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1092-5643)
- Adam Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-6913)
- Muhamed Baljević (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-8458)
- Christine Mantis
- Hira S. Mian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-1067)
- Sascha A. Tuchman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-1573)
- Raphael Teipel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9985-6583)
- Jeremy A. Ross (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8458-7819)
- Neha Korde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5538-4318)
- Rajvineeth Kumar Pothacamury
- Catherine Zhang
- Peter Michael Voorhees (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1661-718X)
- Chetasi Talati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2246-213X)
- Alfred Chung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-5456)
- Pingping Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6059-8919)
- Wei Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4103-0287)
- Aarif Ahsan
- Cesar Rodriguez
- Shaji Kumar
- Hana Safah
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Tulane University (US)
- Froedtert Hospital (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Levine Cancer Institute (US)
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik (DE)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Saint Louis University (US)
- University of San Francisco (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Blood
- Published
- 2025-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-2204
- Primary Topic
- Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00