Longitudinal immune monitoring in patients treated with CD19 and BCMA CAR-T cells using standardized 8‑color flow cytometry panel reveals substantial differences among products kinetics and persistence

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) represent a groundbreaking therapy in hematologic malignancies. Currently approved products target CD19 (axi-cel, brexu-cel, tisa-cel, liso-cel) and BCMA (cilta-cel, ide-cel). CAR-T expansion was linked to both clinical efficacy and toxicity, however, comparative data across CAR-T products remain limited, particularly longitudinal data on CAR-T kinetics and persistence of both CAR-T and non-CAR-T subsets and its clinical relevance. Aims: To assess and compare longitudinal kinetics of CAR-T and non-CAR-T immune subsets among different CD19 and BCMA CAR-T products and to determine clinical relevance of immune monitoring in CAR-T treated patients. Methods: In this multicenter study, 727 peripheral blood (PB) samples from 123 patients treated with axi-cel (sample/patient counts: 377/71), cilta-cel (177/26), tisa-cel (96/14), and brexu-cel (77/12) were analyzed. Samples were collected at baseline (Day 0 [D0]), then D7, D14, D21, D28, and monthly to Month 15 (M15). Specifically designed and standardized 8-color flow cytometry panel (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD20, CD45, CD16+CD56, and CAR) was used in routine practice. Results: Diagnoses included B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) (71% [89/123]), multiple myeloma (MM) (21% [26/123]), and B-cell acute leukemia (ALL) (7% [8/123]). Median age was 63, 71, and 40 years for B-NHL, MM, and ALL respectively. Axi-cel was used in 80% (71/89) of B-NHLs. CRS occurred in 91%, 76%, and 75% with grade ≥2 observed in 54%, 28%, and 24%. ICANS occurred in 46%, 40%, and 38%,with grade ≥2 observed in 30%, 8%, and 12% of B-NHL, MM, and ALL cases. CR/VGPR was achieved in 70%, 96%, and 100% cases and 26%, 0%, and 12% progressed (PD). Median follow-up of was 364 days. Median CD45+ leukocytes per sample was 1.74 × 10⁵ and median limit of detection (LOD) was 0.0117%. First, CAR-T product expansion was compared among the products. Axi-cel and brexu-cel counts (cells/µL PB) peaked on D7, while tisa-cel and cilta-cel peaked on D14. Cilta-cel exhibited markedly higher peak counts (median: 599.1), compared to axi-cel (91.4), tisa-cel (86.8), and brexu-cel (35.3). Moreover, persistence in PB was assessed for axi-cel and cilta-cel, which had sufficient sampling. Axi-cel persisted at low levels often near LOD (median 0.8/µL) in 45% (17/38) to 41% (7/17) of patients from M4 to M13-15, while cilta-cel was undetectable from M3 onwards (16/16). Axi-cel patients showed limited B-cell recovery (5% to 35% from M4 to M13-15), while B-cells recovered in 100% of cilta-cel patients on M3 and sustained. Then, CD4/CD8 kinetics in the CAR-T pool were compared between axi-cel and cilta-cel. Axi-cel had initial low CD4+ proportions followed by CD4+ increase in persistence (D7–D21 30.9% vs M4–M15 85.2%; p=0.001), whereas cilta-cel showed early CD4+ dominance declining over time (D7 77.8% vs D28 43.0%; p<0.001). In order to assess the association of CAR-T cell expansion and clinical outcomes, we used our largest cohort of B-NHL patients treated with axi-cel (N=71). As anticipated, CAR-T expansion at D7 was linked to toxicity and efficacy. Increased number of CD8+ CAR-T cellsassociated with CRS ≥2 (p=0.048), with CD4+ showing statistical trend (p=0.06). Total CAR-T counts were elevated in CRS and ICANS ≥2 (p<0.012). CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-T counts were higher in CRS ≥2 (p<0.02), and CD8+ counts increased in ICANS ≥2 (p=0.005). Patients achieving CR had higher D7 CD8+ CAR-T counts (p=0.049); total and CD8+ counts at D14 were also elevated (p<0.024). Using a cutoff (Maxstat) of 129 CAR-T/µL at D7, low expansion predicted worse PFS (1-year PFS: 59% vs. 100%, HR 0.12, p=0.015) and lower CR rates (57% vs 82%, p=0.08). Conclusion: This is the first study comprehensively comparing CAR-T and non-CAR-T cell kinetics across different CAR-T products targeting CD19 and BCMA using a specialized flow cytometry panel. Distinct peak kinetics and persistence patterns were observed, with cilta-cel showing higher peaks and rapid disappearance by M3, accompanied by B-cell recovery, while axi-cel tends to persist for longer time period in a subset of patients, with prolonged B cell aplasia. In axi-cel patients, greater CAR-T expansion was associated with higher toxicity but also improved response and PFS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5721
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal immune monitoring in patients treated with CD19 and BCMA CAR-T cells using standardized 8‑color flow cytometry panel reveals substantial differences among products kinetics and persistence

Jana Mihályová, Ondřej Souček, Jakub Radocha, Michael Doubek et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Longitudinal immune monitoring in patients treated with CD19 and BCMA CAR-T cells using standardized 8‑color flow cytometry panel reveals substantial differences among products kinetics and persistence

Jana Mihályová, Ondřej Souček, Jakub Radocha, Michael Doubek, Marek Borský, Lucie Broskevičová, Tereza Ševčíková, David Belada, František Folber, Viera Hrabčáková, Ondrej Venglár, Tomáš Kalina, Roman Hájek, David Žihala, Kamila Kutejova, Pavel Žák, Tomas Jelinek, Michaela Horňáková, Lenka Janska Vojtkova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) represent a groundbreaking therapy in hematologic malignancies. Currently approved products target CD19 (axi-cel, brexu-cel, tisa-cel, liso-cel) and BCMA (cilta-cel, ide-cel). CAR-T expansion was linked to both clinical efficacy and toxicity, however, comparative data across CAR-T products remain limited, particularly longitudinal data on CAR-T kinetics and persistence of both CAR-T and non-CAR-T subsets and its clinical relevance. Aims: To assess and compare longitudinal kinetics of CAR-T and non-CAR-T immune subsets among different CD19 and BCMA CAR-T products and to determine clinical relevance of immune monitoring in CAR-T treated patients. Methods: In this multicenter study, 727 peripheral blood (PB) samples from 123 patients treated with axi-cel (sample/patient counts: 377/71), cilta-cel (177/26), tisa-cel (96/14), and brexu-cel (77/12) were analyzed. Samples were collected at baseline (Day 0 [D0]), then D7, D14, D21, D28, and monthly to Month 15 (M15). Specifically designed and standardized 8-color flow cytometry panel (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD20, CD45, CD16+CD56, and CAR) was used in routine practice. Results: Diagnoses included B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) (71% [89/123]), multiple myeloma (MM) (21% [26/123]), and B-cell acute leukemia (ALL) (7% [8/123]). Median age was 63, 71, and 40 years for B-NHL, MM, and ALL respectively. Axi-cel was used in 80% (71/89) of B-NHLs. CRS occurred in 91%, 76%, and 75% with grade ≥2 observed in 54%, 28%, and 24%. ICANS occurred in 46%, 40%, and 38%,with grade ≥2 observed in 30%, 8%, and 12% of B-NHL, MM, and ALL cases. CR/VGPR was achieved in 70%, 96%, and 100% cases and 26%, 0%, and 12% progressed (PD). Median follow-up of was 364 days. Median CD45+ leukocytes per sample was 1.74 × 10⁵ and median limit of detection (LOD) was 0.0117%. First, CAR-T product expansion was compared among the products. Axi-cel and brexu-cel counts (cells/µL PB) peaked on D7, while tisa-cel and cilta-cel peaked on D14. Cilta-cel exhibited markedly higher peak counts (median: 599.1), compared to axi-cel (91.4), tisa-cel (86.8), and brexu-cel (35.3). Moreover, persistence in PB was assessed for axi-cel and cilta-cel, which had sufficient sampling. Axi-cel persisted at low levels often near LOD (median 0.8/µL) in 45% (17/38) to 41% (7/17) of patients from M4 to M13-15, while cilta-cel was undetectable from M3 onwards (16/16). Axi-cel patients showed limited B-cell recovery (5% to 35% from M4 to M13-15), while B-cells recovered in 100% of cilta-cel patients on M3 and sustained. Then, CD4/CD8 kinetics in the CAR-T pool were compared between axi-cel and cilta-cel. Axi-cel had initial low CD4+ proportions followed by CD4+ increase in persistence (D7–D21 30.9% vs M4–M15 85.2%; p=0.001), whereas cilta-cel showed early CD4+ dominance declining over time (D7 77.8% vs D28 43.0%; p<0.001). In order to assess the association of CAR-T cell expansion and clinical outcomes, we used our largest cohort of B-NHL patients treated with axi-cel (N=71). As anticipated, CAR-T expansion at D7 was linked to toxicity and efficacy. Increased number of CD8+ CAR-T cellsassociated with CRS ≥2 (p=0.048), with CD4+ showing statistical trend (p=0.06). Total CAR-T counts were elevated in CRS and ICANS ≥2 (p<0.012). CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-T counts were higher in CRS ≥2 (p<0.02), and CD8+ counts increased in ICANS ≥2 (p=0.005). Patients achieving CR had higher D7 CD8+ CAR-T counts (p=0.049); total and CD8+ counts at D14 were also elevated (p<0.024). Using a cutoff (Maxstat) of 129 CAR-T/µL at D7, low expansion predicted worse PFS (1-year PFS: 59% vs. 100%, HR 0.12, p=0.015) and lower CR rates (57% vs 82%, p=0.08). Conclusion: This is the first study comprehensively comparing CAR-T and non-CAR-T cell kinetics across different CAR-T products targeting CD19 and BCMA using a specialized flow cytometry panel. Distinct peak kinetics and persistence patterns were observed, with cilta-cel showing higher peaks and rapid disappearance by M3, accompanied by B-cell recovery, while axi-cel tends to persist for longer time period in a subset of patients, with prolonged B cell aplasia. In axi-cel patients, greater CAR-T expansion was associated with higher toxicity but also improved response and PFS.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of Ostrava (CZ), Charles University (CZ), University Hospital Ostrava (CZ), University Hospital Brno (CZ), University Hospital Hradec Králové (CZ), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.