Real-world multicenter outcomes of CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody therapies in patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma

Abstract Introduction: CNS involvement in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) results in poor outcomes and remains an unmet need. The CD3xCD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are effective in systemic B-NHL, but data on the CNS activity of BsAbs are limited. Herein, we report real-world outcomes of CD3xCD20 BsAb in patients (pts) with CNS involvement by B-NHL. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study of adult pts with B-NHL with active or history of CNS involvement treated with commercial CD3xCD20 BsAb at 5 US medical centers as part of the Collaborative US Bispecific Consortium (CUBIC). Responses were determined using PET/CT for systemic involvement and brain MRI and/or CSF analysis for CNS involvement. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from BsAb initiation to disease progression (PD) or death, and overall survival (OS) from BsAb initiation to death. Results: We included 20 pts who received BsAb (glofitamab n=15, epcoritamab n=3, mosunetuzumab n=2) from 9/2023 to 11/2024. Twelve pts received BsAb alone and 8 combined with systemic therapy (acalabrutinib/zanubrutinib n=4, polatuzumab n=3) and/or radiation (RT, n=4). Median age was 68 years, 55% were male, and 45% had ECOG ≥2. Twelve pts had diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 3 primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), 2 high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL), 2 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 1 Burkitt (BL). At BsAb initiation, 60% (n=12) of pts had CNS disease: 92% (n=11) with parenchymal disease and 33% (n=4) with leptomeningeal disease (3 had both). Three pts (25%) had isolated CNS disease and 75% (n=9) had concurrent systemic disease. Eight pts (40%) had a history of CNS disease without active involvement at time of BsAb initiation. Pts received a median of 2 (range, 2-8) prior lines of therapy, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in 65% (n=13; median 7 months from CAR T to BsAb), CNS RT in 60% (n=12; median 4 months from RT to BsAb), and intrathecal chemotherapy in 70% (n=14). The best overall response rate (ORR) (CNS + systemic, 1 unevaluable) was 58% (11/19) including complete response (CR) in 37% (7/19) and partial response (PR) in 21% (4/19). The ORR and CR rate were 58%/33% in DLBCL, 67%/67% PCNSL, 50%/50% HGBL, 100%/0% MCL (1 pt evaluable), and 0% BL. ORR and CR rates were similar irrespective of prior CAR T (p=.31, p=.68), choice of BsAb (p=.92, p=.50), or receipt of BsAb alone vs in combination (p=.09, p=.36). In pts with CNS disease at BsAb initiation (n=12), the best ORR (systemic + CNS) was 50% (6/12) including CR in 25% (3/12) and PR in 25% (3/12). The ORR and CR rate were 50% (3/6) and 33% (2/6) with BsAb monotherapy, and 50% (3/6) and 17% (1/6) with BsAb combination. Evaluating CNS-specific responses (n=11, 1 unevaluable), the best CNS ORR was 55% (6/11) including CR in 27% (3/11) and PR in 27% (3/11). Median time to first CNS response was 53 days (range, 19-113), with 83% of responding pts achieving response within 60 days. In pts without active CNS disease, (n=7; 1 unevaluable), the best ORR was 71% (5/7) including CR in 57% (4/7) and PR in 14% (1/7). The ORR and CR rate were 80% (4/5) and 60% (3/5) with BsAb monotherapy, and 50% (1/2) and 50% (1/2) with BsAb combination. With median follow-up of 7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5-not reached), among the whole cohort, the 6-month PFS and OS were 39% (95% CI, 21-71) and 75% (95%CI, 58-97), respectively. The 6-month PFS and OS were similar with BsAb monotherapy (38% [95% CI, 18-81] and 75% [95% CI, 54-100]) compared with BsAb combination (42% [16-100%] [p=.99] and 75% [50-100%] [p=.91]), respectively. PFS and OS were similar irrespective of lymphoma subtype (PFS, p=.61; OS, p=.78), prior CAR T (PFS, p=.34; OS, p=.72), or BsAb agent (PFS, p=.89; OS, p=.62). Among pts with CNS disease at BsAb initiation, the 6-month CNS PFS was 65% (95% CI, 38-100%). No patients achieving CNS CR had CNS relapse at last follow-up. Among pts without active CNS disease at BsAb initiation, only 1 pt had CNS relapse. Any grade (G) CRS occurred in 35% (n=7, all G1-2). Any G ICANS occurred in 15% (n=3; 2 G1, and 1 suspected G4). Conclusion: Our study shows significant clinical activity for the CD3xCD20 BsAb, alone and in combination, in B-NHL with CNS involvement (CNS-specific ORR and CR rate of 55% and 27%, respectively) without new safety concerns. Larger studies, ideally prospective, are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of CD3xCD20 BsAb in pts with CNS involvement by B-NHL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-5520
Primary Topic
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world multicenter outcomes of CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody therapies in patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma

Manali Kamdar, Geoffrey Shouse, Amrita Chauhan, Yazeed Sawalha et al.
Blood
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Real-world multicenter outcomes of CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody therapies in patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma

Manali Kamdar, Geoffrey Shouse, Amrita Chauhan, Yazeed Sawalha, Alex Francisco Herrera, Steven M. Bair, Sairah Ahmed, James L. Godfrey, Karan L. Chohan, Amy A. Ayers, Ajay Major, Gilles Salles, Sonia Godbole, Lorenzo Falchi, Omnia Farahat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: CNS involvement in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) results in poor outcomes and remains an unmet need. The CD3xCD20 bispecific antibodies (BsAb) are effective in systemic B-NHL, but data on the CNS activity of BsAbs are limited. Herein, we report real-world outcomes of CD3xCD20 BsAb in patients (pts) with CNS involvement by B-NHL. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study of adult pts with B-NHL with active or history of CNS involvement treated with commercial CD3xCD20 BsAb at 5 US medical centers as part of the Collaborative US Bispecific Consortium (CUBIC). Responses were determined using PET/CT for systemic involvement and brain MRI and/or CSF analysis for CNS involvement. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from BsAb initiation to disease progression (PD) or death, and overall survival (OS) from BsAb initiation to death. Results: We included 20 pts who received BsAb (glofitamab n=15, epcoritamab n=3, mosunetuzumab n=2) from 9/2023 to 11/2024. Twelve pts received BsAb alone and 8 combined with systemic therapy (acalabrutinib/zanubrutinib n=4, polatuzumab n=3) and/or radiation (RT, n=4). Median age was 68 years, 55% were male, and 45% had ECOG ≥2. Twelve pts had diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 3 primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), 2 high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL), 2 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 1 Burkitt (BL). At BsAb initiation, 60% (n=12) of pts had CNS disease: 92% (n=11) with parenchymal disease and 33% (n=4) with leptomeningeal disease (3 had both). Three pts (25%) had isolated CNS disease and 75% (n=9) had concurrent systemic disease. Eight pts (40%) had a history of CNS disease without active involvement at time of BsAb initiation. Pts received a median of 2 (range, 2-8) prior lines of therapy, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in 65% (n=13; median 7 months from CAR T to BsAb), CNS RT in 60% (n=12; median 4 months from RT to BsAb), and intrathecal chemotherapy in 70% (n=14). The best overall response rate (ORR) (CNS + systemic, 1 unevaluable) was 58% (11/19) including complete response (CR) in 37% (7/19) and partial response (PR) in 21% (4/19). The ORR and CR rate were 58%/33% in DLBCL, 67%/67% PCNSL, 50%/50% HGBL, 100%/0% MCL (1 pt evaluable), and 0% BL. ORR and CR rates were similar irrespective of prior CAR T (p=.31, p=.68), choice of BsAb (p=.92, p=.50), or receipt of BsAb alone vs in combination (p=.09, p=.36). In pts with CNS disease at BsAb initiation (n=12), the best ORR (systemic + CNS) was 50% (6/12) including CR in 25% (3/12) and PR in 25% (3/12). The ORR and CR rate were 50% (3/6) and 33% (2/6) with BsAb monotherapy, and 50% (3/6) and 17% (1/6) with BsAb combination. Evaluating CNS-specific responses (n=11, 1 unevaluable), the best CNS ORR was 55% (6/11) including CR in 27% (3/11) and PR in 27% (3/11). Median time to first CNS response was 53 days (range, 19-113), with 83% of responding pts achieving response within 60 days. In pts without active CNS disease, (n=7; 1 unevaluable), the best ORR was 71% (5/7) including CR in 57% (4/7) and PR in 14% (1/7). The ORR and CR rate were 80% (4/5) and 60% (3/5) with BsAb monotherapy, and 50% (1/2) and 50% (1/2) with BsAb combination. With median follow-up of 7 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5-not reached), among the whole cohort, the 6-month PFS and OS were 39% (95% CI, 21-71) and 75% (95%CI, 58-97), respectively. The 6-month PFS and OS were similar with BsAb monotherapy (38% [95% CI, 18-81] and 75% [95% CI, 54-100]) compared with BsAb combination (42% [16-100%] [p=.99] and 75% [50-100%] [p=.91]), respectively. PFS and OS were similar irrespective of lymphoma subtype (PFS, p=.61; OS, p=.78), prior CAR T (PFS, p=.34; OS, p=.72), or BsAb agent (PFS, p=.89; OS, p=.62). Among pts with CNS disease at BsAb initiation, the 6-month CNS PFS was 65% (95% CI, 38-100%). No patients achieving CNS CR had CNS relapse at last follow-up. Among pts without active CNS disease at BsAb initiation, only 1 pt had CNS relapse. Any grade (G) CRS occurred in 35% (n=7, all G1-2). Any G ICANS occurred in 15% (n=3; 2 G1, and 1 suspected G4). Conclusion: Our study shows significant clinical activity for the CD3xCD20 BsAb, alone and in combination, in B-NHL with CNS involvement (CNS-specific ORR and CR rate of 55% and 27%, respectively) without new safety concerns. Larger studies, ideally prospective, are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of CD3xCD20 BsAb in pts with CNS involvement by B-NHL.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US), Kettering University (US), City of Hope (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.