TP53 aberrant Mantle Cell Lymphoma treated with first-line systemic therapy: A real-world analysis of outcomes in 120 patients treated in the United Kingdom

Abstract Background: Alterations to the tumor suppressorTP53 in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are one of the strongest predictors of poor responses to immunochemotherapy (ICT) and early mortality. Recent BSH guidelines (Eyre et al, 2024) recommend TP53 mutation analysis is undertaken on all new MCL diagnoses, and in the United Kingdom (UK) testing is now commonplace. With adverse outcomes observed with conventional ICT in clinical trials, the optimal management for these patients (pts) remains poorly defined. There is limited real-world data to guide clinical practice, providing an imperative to review outcomes of this cohort treated within an integrated healthcare framework. This study aims to provide insights on treatment efficacy; refine prognostic understanding and guide future management. Aims: Assess outcomes of pts receiving first-line (1L) systemic therapy (tx) for TP53 aberrant MCL treated within the UK in the modern era. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of anonymised data from pts with TP53 aberrant MCL treated with 1L systemic tx at 28 centers across the UK. Patients commenced 1L tx between January 2018 and March 2025. Response to tx was defined as per Lugano classification (Cheson et al, 2014). Data was collected on baseline characteristics and subsequent lines of therapy. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from start of 1L tx. Secondary outcomes included tx failure free survival (FFS), defined as time to next line tx, progression of disease or death. Predictors of OS were determined using univariate Cox regression. Results: Data was collected on 120 patients: median age 65 years (range 41-82) with 70% male. TP53 alterations included 113 pts with mutations, and 7 pts with deletions. Prior to 1L tx clinical phenotype was defined as nodal in 69% and leukemic, non-nodal in 31%; LDH ratio >1.5 in 40%; ECOG performance status ≥2 in 17%; blastoid morphology in 21%; Ki67 ≥50% in 46%; and MIPI high risk in 68%. 1L tx was high intensity ICT (rituximab + high dose cytarabine based) in 60 pts (50%), intermediate intensity ICT (R-CHOP/R-Bendamustine/R-BAC/VR-CAP) in 39 pts (33%), non-ICT (BTK inhibitor (BTKi) based) in 17 pts (14%), and low intensity ICT in 4 pts (3%). Ten pts were consolidated at 1L with autologous SCT; 8 pts with allogeneic SCT. Overall response rate to 1L was 68%, complete response rate was 45%. At a median follow up of 23 months (mo), 69 pts progressed, of which, 49 pts had died. Four pts died without relapse. The median 1L FFS was 13.9 mo (95% CI 8.9-18.9), and estimated median OS was 29.8 mo (95% CI 20.8-38.8). The median FFS according to 1L tx was 22.3 mo (95% CI 6.2-38.4) for high intensity ICT; 8.9 mo (95% CI 3.8-14.0) for intermediate intensity ICT; and 14.6 mo (95% CI 4.5-24.7) for non-ICT. On univariate Cox regression, LDH ratio >1.5 was predictive of OS (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.3; p=0.007). Age >65 years, nodal vs non-nodal, blastoid morphology, Ki67 ≥50% and MIPI high risk were not predictive Of 69 pts at relapse: 11 pts died without 2L therapy; 48 pts received BTKi, 7 pts received ICT, 3 pts had not commenced 2L. Of 48 pts receiving 2L BTKi, 41 pts progressed and 33 had died. The median FFS from start 2L BTKi was 2.5 mo (95% CI 1.5-3.5), and median OS 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.0-7.2). Of 41 pts progressing on BTKi, only 10 were subsequently infused with 3L brexucabtagene autolecel (brexu-cel) (24%). Conclusion: Relative to contemporary real-world datasets, the OS analysis highlights that current management of TP53 aberrant MCL is inadequate, and there is urgent need to evolve novel strategies that combat this uniquely aggressive biology. Relatively high initial response rates to 1L tx were generally not durable, and subsequent outcomes with 2L BTKi were poor. The low proportion of pts ultimately proceeding to 3L+ brexu-cel intimates the challenge of delivering this therapy to pts with rapidly progressive disease, and provides a rationale for earlier use in this subgroup. Baseline characteristics demonstrated frequent markers of poor prognosis, with LDH ratio >1.5 the only characteristic predictive of OS. Pts presenting with markedly elevated LDH may be most suitable for aggressive 1L management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-1827
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TP53 aberrant Mantle Cell Lymphoma treated with first-line systemic therapy: A real-world analysis of outcomes in 120 patients treated in the United Kingdom

Nimish Shah, John Willan, Renata J. Walewska, David Dutton et al.
Blood
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

TP53 aberrant Mantle Cell Lymphoma treated with first-line systemic therapy: A real-world analysis of outcomes in 120 patients treated in the United Kingdom

Nimish Shah, John Willan, Renata J. Walewska, David Dutton, Matthew R. Wilson, Lisa Lowry, Catherine Ogilvie, Anvesha Singh, Harriet S. Walter, Matthew J. Ahearne, Mark Bishton, Fatima Jamil, Sunil Iyengar, Laura Dunning, Rory McCulloch, Toby A. Eyre, Jessica Okosun, Catherine Prodger, Belinda Austen, Nicola Crosbie, Bernard Maybury, Amjad Hmaid, Megan Heague, David Lewis, J. Stuart Wolf, A. Robert Turner, Jonathan Lambert, Neil Phillips, Mac Macheta, Adam Gibb, Angus Broom, Gavin Preston, Vaishak Vidyadhar, Thomas Cahil
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Alterations to the tumor suppressorTP53 in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are one of the strongest predictors of poor responses to immunochemotherapy (ICT) and early mortality. Recent BSH guidelines (Eyre et al, 2024) recommend TP53 mutation analysis is undertaken on all new MCL diagnoses, and in the United Kingdom (UK) testing is now commonplace. With adverse outcomes observed with conventional ICT in clinical trials, the optimal management for these patients (pts) remains poorly defined. There is limited real-world data to guide clinical practice, providing an imperative to review outcomes of this cohort treated within an integrated healthcare framework. This study aims to provide insights on treatment efficacy; refine prognostic understanding and guide future management. Aims: Assess outcomes of pts receiving first-line (1L) systemic therapy (tx) for TP53 aberrant MCL treated within the UK in the modern era. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective analysis of anonymised data from pts with TP53 aberrant MCL treated with 1L systemic tx at 28 centers across the UK. Patients commenced 1L tx between January 2018 and March 2025. Response to tx was defined as per Lugano classification (Cheson et al, 2014). Data was collected on baseline characteristics and subsequent lines of therapy. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from start of 1L tx. Secondary outcomes included tx failure free survival (FFS), defined as time to next line tx, progression of disease or death. Predictors of OS were determined using univariate Cox regression. Results: Data was collected on 120 patients: median age 65 years (range 41-82) with 70% male. TP53 alterations included 113 pts with mutations, and 7 pts with deletions. Prior to 1L tx clinical phenotype was defined as nodal in 69% and leukemic, non-nodal in 31%; LDH ratio >1.5 in 40%; ECOG performance status ≥2 in 17%; blastoid morphology in 21%; Ki67 ≥50% in 46%; and MIPI high risk in 68%. 1L tx was high intensity ICT (rituximab + high dose cytarabine based) in 60 pts (50%), intermediate intensity ICT (R-CHOP/R-Bendamustine/R-BAC/VR-CAP) in 39 pts (33%), non-ICT (BTK inhibitor (BTKi) based) in 17 pts (14%), and low intensity ICT in 4 pts (3%). Ten pts were consolidated at 1L with autologous SCT; 8 pts with allogeneic SCT. Overall response rate to 1L was 68%, complete response rate was 45%. At a median follow up of 23 months (mo), 69 pts progressed, of which, 49 pts had died. Four pts died without relapse. The median 1L FFS was 13.9 mo (95% CI 8.9-18.9), and estimated median OS was 29.8 mo (95% CI 20.8-38.8). The median FFS according to 1L tx was 22.3 mo (95% CI 6.2-38.4) for high intensity ICT; 8.9 mo (95% CI 3.8-14.0) for intermediate intensity ICT; and 14.6 mo (95% CI 4.5-24.7) for non-ICT. On univariate Cox regression, LDH ratio >1.5 was predictive of OS (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.3; p=0.007). Age >65 years, nodal vs non-nodal, blastoid morphology, Ki67 ≥50% and MIPI high risk were not predictive Of 69 pts at relapse: 11 pts died without 2L therapy; 48 pts received BTKi, 7 pts received ICT, 3 pts had not commenced 2L. Of 48 pts receiving 2L BTKi, 41 pts progressed and 33 had died. The median FFS from start 2L BTKi was 2.5 mo (95% CI 1.5-3.5), and median OS 5.6 mo (95% CI 4.0-7.2). Of 41 pts progressing on BTKi, only 10 were subsequently infused with 3L brexucabtagene autolecel (brexu-cel) (24%). Conclusion: Relative to contemporary real-world datasets, the OS analysis highlights that current management of TP53 aberrant MCL is inadequate, and there is urgent need to evolve novel strategies that combat this uniquely aggressive biology. Relatively high initial response rates to 1L tx were generally not durable, and subsequent outcomes with 2L BTKi were poor. The low proportion of pts ultimately proceeding to 3L+ brexu-cel intimates the challenge of delivering this therapy to pts with rapidly progressive disease, and provides a rationale for earlier use in this subgroup. Baseline characteristics demonstrated frequent markers of poor prognosis, with LDH ratio >1.5 the only characteristic predictive of OS. Pts presenting with markedly elevated LDH may be most suitable for aggressive 1L management strategies.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NHS Lothian (GB), Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (GB), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB), Raigmore Hospital (GB), Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NHS Highland (GB), Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.