Correction: Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Facial Privacy Protection for Ocular Diagnosis: Development and Validation Study

Facial biometric data, while valuable for clinical applications, poses substantial privacy and security risks. This paper aims to address the privacy and security concerns related to facial biometric data and support auxiliary diagnoses, in pursuit of which we developed Digital FaceDefender, an artificial intelligence–driven privacy safeguard solution. We constructed a diverse set of digitally synthesized Asian face avatars representing both sexes, spanning ages 5 to 85 years in 10-year increments, using 70,000 facial images and 13,061 Asian face images. Landmark data were separately extracted from both patient and avatar images. Affine transformations ensured spatial alignment, followed by color correction and Gaussian blur to enhance fusion quality. For auxiliary diagnosis, we established 95% CIs for pixel distances within the eye region on a cohort of 1163 individuals, serving as diagnostic benchmarks. Reidentification risk was assessed using the ArcFace model, applied to 2500 images reconstructed via Detailed Expression Capture and Animation (DECA). Finally, Cohe Compared to the DM method, Digital FaceDefender significantly reduced facial similarity scores (FDface vs raw images: 0.31; FLAME_FDface vs raw images: 0.09) and achieved zero Rank-1 accuracy in Pose #2-#3 and Pose #2-#5,with near-zero accuracy in Pose #4 (0.02) and Pose #5 (0.04), confirming lower reidentification risk. Cohen Kappa analysis demonstrated moderate agreement between our benchmarks and ophthalmologists’ assessments for the left eye (κ=0.37) and right eye (κ=0.45; both P<.001), validating diagnostic reliability of the benchmarks. Furthermore, the user-friendly Digital FaceDefender platform has been established and is readily accessible for use. In summary, Digital FaceDefender effectively balances privacy protection and diagnostic use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/84928
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction: Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Facial Privacy Protection for Ocular Diagnosis: Development and Validation Study

Mingguang He, Chengcheng Huang, Anping Guo, Danli Shi et al.
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Face recognition and analysis
article

Correction: Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Facial Privacy Protection for Ocular Diagnosis: Development and Validation Study

Mingguang He, Chengcheng Huang, Anping Guo, Danli Shi, Zhenmao Wang, Xueqin Wang, Haizhu Tan, Chiyu Wei, Lei Sun, Hongyu Chen
article en

Abstract

Facial biometric data, while valuable for clinical applications, poses substantial privacy and security risks. This paper aims to address the privacy and security concerns related to facial biometric data and support auxiliary diagnoses, in pursuit of which we developed Digital FaceDefender, an artificial intelligence–driven privacy safeguard solution. We constructed a diverse set of digitally synthesized Asian face avatars representing both sexes, spanning ages 5 to 85 years in 10-year increments, using 70,000 facial images and 13,061 Asian face images. Landmark data were separately extracted from both patient and avatar images. Affine transformations ensured spatial alignment, followed by color correction and Gaussian blur to enhance fusion quality. For auxiliary diagnosis, we established 95% CIs for pixel distances within the eye region on a cohort of 1163 individuals, serving as diagnostic benchmarks. Reidentification risk was assessed using the ArcFace model, applied to 2500 images reconstructed via Detailed Expression Capture and Animation (DECA). Finally, Cohe Compared to the DM method, Digital FaceDefender significantly reduced facial similarity scores (FDface vs raw images: 0.31; FLAME_FDface vs raw images: 0.09) and achieved zero Rank-1 accuracy in Pose #2-#3 and Pose #2-#5,with near-zero accuracy in Pose #4 (0.02) and Pose #5 (0.04), confirming lower reidentification risk. Cohen Kappa analysis demonstrated moderate agreement between our benchmarks and ophthalmologists’ assessments for the left eye (κ=0.37) and right eye (κ=0.45; both P<.001), validating diagnostic reliability of the benchmarks. Furthermore, the user-friendly Digital FaceDefender platform has been established and is readily accessible for use. In summary, Digital FaceDefender effectively balances privacy protection and diagnostic use.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Harbin Medical University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Shantou University (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Shantou University Medical College (CN), Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Laser Research Institute (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.