Real-world efficacy and prognostic modeling of venetoclax-enhanced intensive chemotherapy in fit AML

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy in Fit AML patients, and to construct a prognostic prediction model. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 158 newly diagnosed Fit AML patients admitted to Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2022 to May 2024. Four regimens were compared: DAV, IAV, HAV, and MAV. Primary endpoints included composite complete remission (CRc), measurable residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate, overall survival (OS), and adverse reaction rates. Seven machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, MLP, SVM) were used to build prognostic models, assessing feature importance, model performance, and risk stratification. Results: The cohort had a median age of 47.5 years, with ELN-2022 risk stratification showing 11.4% favorable, 58.9% intermediate, and 29.7% adverse prognosis. Regimen distribution comprised DAV (44.9%), IAV (36.1%), HAV (10.8%), and MAV (8.2%). The overall CRc rate was 77.2% and MRD-negativity rate was 56.56%. While no significant CRc difference existed among treatment regimens (P=0.348), the adverse-risk ELN group exhibited significantly lower CRc than the intermediate-risk group (61.7% vs 83.8%, P=0.010). Survival analysis demonstrated superior OS in CRc patients versus non-responders (HR=0.42, P=0.046), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation significantly improved survival (HR=0.31, P=0.008). For prognostic modeling, XGBoost achieved optimal performance in the entire cohort (validation AUC=0.94, sensitivity=0.75, specificity=0.91), identifying bone marrow blast percentage and CD56 expression as key negative predictors, with CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and NPM1 mutation as positive predictors. In the post-remission cohort, Random Forest showed the best performance (AUC=0.92, sensitivity=0.81, specificity=0.88), where CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and IDH2 mutation were key negative variables, while age and ECOG score were positive predictors. Calibration and decision curves validated clinical utility, and risk stratification effectively discriminated high-risk patients, with both models demonstrating high generalizability for personalized treatment guidance. Conclusion: Venetoclax-enhanced intensive chemotherapy achieves high response rates in Fit AML. Our machine learning models provide novel tools for prognostic prediction and personalized treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6985
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world efficacy and prognostic modeling of venetoclax-enhanced intensive chemotherapy in fit AML

Jianhan Fu, Xi Yang, Jiafei Wu, Hong Zheng et al.
Blood
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Real-world efficacy and prognostic modeling of venetoclax-enhanced intensive chemotherapy in fit AML

Jianhan Fu, Xi Yang, Jiafei Wu, Hong Zheng, Hui Li, Boyue Zheng, Xiaobing Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Venetoclax combined with intensive chemotherapy in Fit AML patients, and to construct a prognostic prediction model. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 158 newly diagnosed Fit AML patients admitted to Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2022 to May 2024. Four regimens were compared: DAV, IAV, HAV, and MAV. Primary endpoints included composite complete remission (CRc), measurable residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate, overall survival (OS), and adverse reaction rates. Seven machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, MLP, SVM) were used to build prognostic models, assessing feature importance, model performance, and risk stratification. Results: The cohort had a median age of 47.5 years, with ELN-2022 risk stratification showing 11.4% favorable, 58.9% intermediate, and 29.7% adverse prognosis. Regimen distribution comprised DAV (44.9%), IAV (36.1%), HAV (10.8%), and MAV (8.2%). The overall CRc rate was 77.2% and MRD-negativity rate was 56.56%. While no significant CRc difference existed among treatment regimens (P=0.348), the adverse-risk ELN group exhibited significantly lower CRc than the intermediate-risk group (61.7% vs 83.8%, P=0.010). Survival analysis demonstrated superior OS in CRc patients versus non-responders (HR=0.42, P=0.046), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation significantly improved survival (HR=0.31, P=0.008). For prognostic modeling, XGBoost achieved optimal performance in the entire cohort (validation AUC=0.94, sensitivity=0.75, specificity=0.91), identifying bone marrow blast percentage and CD56 expression as key negative predictors, with CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and NPM1 mutation as positive predictors. In the post-remission cohort, Random Forest showed the best performance (AUC=0.92, sensitivity=0.81, specificity=0.88), where CD4+/CD8+ T-cell ratio and IDH2 mutation were key negative variables, while age and ECOG score were positive predictors. Calibration and decision curves validated clinical utility, and risk stratification effectively discriminated high-risk patients, with both models demonstrating high generalizability for personalized treatment guidance. Conclusion: Venetoclax-enhanced intensive chemotherapy achieves high response rates in Fit AML. Our machine learning models provide novel tools for prognostic prediction and personalized treatment.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Wuqing District People's Hospital (CN), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Chengdu University (CN), First People's Hospital of Chongqing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.