Prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) induction: A meta-analysis dispelling relapse concerns and reinforcing supportive benefit

Abstract Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely used to reduce chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, yet its role as primary prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to concerns of increased relapse risk. This study aims to clarify the safety and efficacy profile of G-CSF during induction therapy in adult AML patients through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing G-CSF prophylaxis to placebo or standard care in AML. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Nine RCTs were included, analyzing: Infection-related mortality (6 RCTs; n = 1,465), Disease progression/recurrence mortality (3 RCTs; n = 920), Adverse events (e.g., musculoskeletal pain) (2 RCTs; n = 365). Results: Infection-related mortality: No significant difference between G-CSF and control (RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.64–1.36; I² = 0%). Disease progression/recurrence mortality: No increased risk observed with G-CSF (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82–1.40; I² = 43%). Adverse reactions (musculoskeletal pain): Comparable between groups (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.50–2.34; I² = 70%). Importantly, G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization without compromising survival or increasing relapse risk. Conclusion: G-CSF primary prophylaxis during AML induction therapy is safe and effective. It does not adversely impact infection-related mortality, disease progression, or adverse events, while substantially reducing neutropenia duration. These findings strongly support the use of G-CSF in adult AML patients, especially those at high risk of infectious complications. G-CSF should be considered a standard supportive care measure in AML induction protocols to optimize clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-6984
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) induction: A meta-analysis dispelling relapse concerns and reinforcing supportive benefit

Joyson Poulose, Marcelle Meseeha, Anubhuti Sharma, Arundhati Sharma et al.
Blood
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
article

Prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in AML (Acute myeloid leukemia) induction: A meta-analysis dispelling relapse concerns and reinforcing supportive benefit

Joyson Poulose, Marcelle Meseeha, Anubhuti Sharma, Arundhati Sharma, Simranpreet Singh Daid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely used to reduce chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, yet its role as primary prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to concerns of increased relapse risk. This study aims to clarify the safety and efficacy profile of G-CSF during induction therapy in adult AML patients through a comprehensive meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing G-CSF prophylaxis to placebo or standard care in AML. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Nine RCTs were included, analyzing: Infection-related mortality (6 RCTs; n = 1,465), Disease progression/recurrence mortality (3 RCTs; n = 920), Adverse events (e.g., musculoskeletal pain) (2 RCTs; n = 365). Results: Infection-related mortality: No significant difference between G-CSF and control (RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.64–1.36; I² = 0%). Disease progression/recurrence mortality: No increased risk observed with G-CSF (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.82–1.40; I² = 43%). Adverse reactions (musculoskeletal pain): Comparable between groups (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.50–2.34; I² = 70%). Importantly, G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization without compromising survival or increasing relapse risk. Conclusion: G-CSF primary prophylaxis during AML induction therapy is safe and effective. It does not adversely impact infection-related mortality, disease progression, or adverse events, while substantially reducing neutropenia duration. These findings strongly support the use of G-CSF in adult AML patients, especially those at high risk of infectious complications. G-CSF should be considered a standard supportive care measure in AML induction protocols to optimize clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US), WilliamsRDM (United States) (US), Roger Williams University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.