Concizumab plasma concentration measurements for personalized dose adjustment in patients with Hemophilia A/B with and without inhibitors: Data from the Phase 3 explorer7 and explorer8 studies

Abstract Background Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody intended for patients with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. It is approved in the US, Europe and other countries for once-daily, subcutaneous prophylaxis in hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Aim Describe the observed and modelled pharmacokinetics (PK) and bleeding outcomes from one-time concizumab dose adjustments in phase 3 concizumab studies. Methods In two prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 concizumab studies, explorer7 (patients with inhibitors; NCT04083781) and explorer8 (patients without inhibitors; NCT04082429), male patients aged ≥12 years were randomized 1:2 to no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) or allocated to non-randomized concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3 and 4). Following a study pause due to non-fatal thromboembolic events in 3 patients receiving concizumab, a revised dosing regimen was implemented with a 1.0 mg/kg loading dose on the first day of treatment, followed by an initial daily dose of 0.20 mg/kg. At week 4, concizumab plasma concentrations were measured with a clinical trial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for potential one-time dose adjustments to set the maintenance dose. The dose was increased to 0.25 mg/kg if concizumab plasma concentration was <200 ng/mL, decreased to 0.15 mg/kg if >4,000 ng/mL, or maintained at 0.20 mg/kg if between 200–4,000 ng/mL. Population PK modeling was used to simulate concizumab exposure and response. Efficacy outcomes based on dose adjustments from the primary analysis (explorer7) or confirmatory analysis (explorer8) cut-offs are presented. Results A total of 281 patients were assigned to one of four arms in explorer7 and explorer8 (62.3% White, 28.1% Asian, 4.6% Black/African American, 2.1% American Indian/Alaska native, 2.5% not reported, 0.4% other). Concizumab plasma concentration was measured in 218 of 226 concizumab-exposed patients in arms 2–4; 8 patients withdrew before maintenance doses were reported. Of the 218 patients measured, 153 (70.2%) continued with a maintenance dose of 0.20 mg/kg, 55 (25.2%) patients adjusted to 0.25 mg/kg and 10 (4.6%) patients adjusted to 0.15 mg/kg. The majority of patients (70.2%) had concizumab plasma concentrations between 200–4,000 ng/mL at week 4 and continued with maintenance dose at 0.20 mg/kg; mean concizumab plasma concentration in this group were 629 ng/mL and 608 ng/mL at week 4 and week 12, respectively. The proportion of patients with concizumab plasma concentrations <200 ng/mL at week 4 and adjusted to 0.25 mg/kg was 25.2%, consistent with the population model prediction of 21%. After dose adjustment to 0.25 mg/kg, the mean concizumab plasma concentration in the <200 ng/mL group increased from 119 ng/mL to 296 ng/mL from week 4 to week 12. The proportion of patients with concizumab plasma concentrations >4,000 ng/mL at week 4 and adjusted to 0.15 mg/kg was 4.6%, lower than the model prediction of approximately 10%. After dose adjustment to 0.15 mg/kg, the mean concizumab plasma concentration decreased from 5,525 ng/mL to 766 ng/mL from week 4 to week 12. Post-dose adjustment concizumab plasma concentrations aligned with modelled predictions. Based on simulated efficacy outcomes in the <200 ng/mL group, increasing the daily maintenance dose to 0.25 mg/kg would reduce the predicted annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Consistent with modelled predictions, observed mean ABR within the <200 ng/mL group was lower after dose adjustment vs before dose adjustment: 3.8 (standard deviation [SD]: 8.2; mean observation period 262 days) vs 7.2 (SD: 10.4; mean observation period 64 days), respectively. Mean ABR in the <200 ng/mL group after dose adjustment was similar to the 200–4,000 ng/mL group (3.1; SD: 6.5; mean observation period 287 days). For patients with >4,000 ng/mL plasma concizumab, observed mean ABR after dose adjustment was 3.8 (SD: 4.8; mean observation period 340 days), similar to the 200–4,000 ng/mL group (3.1; SD: 6.5; mean observation period 287 days). Conclusions These findings support the use of concizumab plasma concentration-guided dose adjustments to optimize prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Exposure-response analyses confirmed the validity of the selected lower (200 ng/mL) and upper (4,000 ng/mL) limits of concizumab plasma concentration and showed that dose adjustments can effectively personalize therapy to reduce bleeding rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-3070
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Concizumab plasma concentration measurements for personalized dose adjustment in patients with Hemophilia A/B with and without inhibitors: Data from the Phase 3 explorer7 and explorer8 studies

Hermann Eichler, Chris Barnes, Mary Mathias, Sonata Šaulytė Trakymienė et al.
Blood
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Concizumab plasma concentration measurements for personalized dose adjustment in patients with Hemophilia A/B with and without inhibitors: Data from the Phase 3 explorer7 and explorer8 studies

Hermann Eichler, Chris Barnes, Mary Mathias, Sonata Šaulytė Trakymienė, Johnny Ndoni Mahlangu, Thomas Porstmann, Tulika Seth, Jakob Oemar Gjørret
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) monoclonal antibody intended for patients with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. It is approved in the US, Europe and other countries for once-daily, subcutaneous prophylaxis in hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Aim Describe the observed and modelled pharmacokinetics (PK) and bleeding outcomes from one-time concizumab dose adjustments in phase 3 concizumab studies. Methods In two prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 concizumab studies, explorer7 (patients with inhibitors; NCT04083781) and explorer8 (patients without inhibitors; NCT04082429), male patients aged ≥12 years were randomized 1:2 to no prophylaxis (arm 1) or concizumab prophylaxis (arm 2) or allocated to non-randomized concizumab prophylaxis (arms 3 and 4). Following a study pause due to non-fatal thromboembolic events in 3 patients receiving concizumab, a revised dosing regimen was implemented with a 1.0 mg/kg loading dose on the first day of treatment, followed by an initial daily dose of 0.20 mg/kg. At week 4, concizumab plasma concentrations were measured with a clinical trial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for potential one-time dose adjustments to set the maintenance dose. The dose was increased to 0.25 mg/kg if concizumab plasma concentration was <200 ng/mL, decreased to 0.15 mg/kg if >4,000 ng/mL, or maintained at 0.20 mg/kg if between 200–4,000 ng/mL. Population PK modeling was used to simulate concizumab exposure and response. Efficacy outcomes based on dose adjustments from the primary analysis (explorer7) or confirmatory analysis (explorer8) cut-offs are presented. Results A total of 281 patients were assigned to one of four arms in explorer7 and explorer8 (62.3% White, 28.1% Asian, 4.6% Black/African American, 2.1% American Indian/Alaska native, 2.5% not reported, 0.4% other). Concizumab plasma concentration was measured in 218 of 226 concizumab-exposed patients in arms 2–4; 8 patients withdrew before maintenance doses were reported. Of the 218 patients measured, 153 (70.2%) continued with a maintenance dose of 0.20 mg/kg, 55 (25.2%) patients adjusted to 0.25 mg/kg and 10 (4.6%) patients adjusted to 0.15 mg/kg. The majority of patients (70.2%) had concizumab plasma concentrations between 200–4,000 ng/mL at week 4 and continued with maintenance dose at 0.20 mg/kg; mean concizumab plasma concentration in this group were 629 ng/mL and 608 ng/mL at week 4 and week 12, respectively. The proportion of patients with concizumab plasma concentrations <200 ng/mL at week 4 and adjusted to 0.25 mg/kg was 25.2%, consistent with the population model prediction of 21%. After dose adjustment to 0.25 mg/kg, the mean concizumab plasma concentration in the <200 ng/mL group increased from 119 ng/mL to 296 ng/mL from week 4 to week 12. The proportion of patients with concizumab plasma concentrations >4,000 ng/mL at week 4 and adjusted to 0.15 mg/kg was 4.6%, lower than the model prediction of approximately 10%. After dose adjustment to 0.15 mg/kg, the mean concizumab plasma concentration decreased from 5,525 ng/mL to 766 ng/mL from week 4 to week 12. Post-dose adjustment concizumab plasma concentrations aligned with modelled predictions. Based on simulated efficacy outcomes in the <200 ng/mL group, increasing the daily maintenance dose to 0.25 mg/kg would reduce the predicted annualized bleeding rate (ABR). Consistent with modelled predictions, observed mean ABR within the <200 ng/mL group was lower after dose adjustment vs before dose adjustment: 3.8 (standard deviation [SD]: 8.2; mean observation period 262 days) vs 7.2 (SD: 10.4; mean observation period 64 days), respectively. Mean ABR in the <200 ng/mL group after dose adjustment was similar to the 200–4,000 ng/mL group (3.1; SD: 6.5; mean observation period 287 days). For patients with >4,000 ng/mL plasma concizumab, observed mean ABR after dose adjustment was 3.8 (SD: 4.8; mean observation period 340 days), similar to the 200–4,000 ng/mL group (3.1; SD: 6.5; mean observation period 287 days). Conclusions These findings support the use of concizumab plasma concentration-guided dose adjustments to optimize prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A or B, with or without inhibitors. Exposure-response analyses confirmed the validity of the selected lower (200 ng/mL) and upper (4,000 ng/mL) limits of concizumab plasma concentration and showed that dose adjustments can effectively personalize therapy to reduce bleeding rates.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
National Health Laboratory Service (ZA), Royal Children's Hospital (AU), Vilnius University (LT), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Novo Nordisk (Switzerland) (CH), Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos (LT), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Saarland University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.