Morphological diversity in the honeyeater hyolingual apparatus and its relationship with nectarivory

Honeyeaters (Aves, Meliphagidae) are a speciose clade of nectarivorous birds, and there is immense diversity in the degree to which different species within the family rely on nectar. Honeyeater tongues are commonly described as similar to a paintbrush, with this morphology being interpreted as an adaptation for increasing nectar extraction efficiency. However, there has been limited work documenting the degree of interspecific diversity in tongue morphology across the family or the extent to which such diversity correlates with dependance on nectar. This information is also lacking for the hyoid bones, the structures responsible for moving the tongue in and out of the mouth. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by examining honeyeater tongues and hyoids from across the family. We found that there are six distinct tongue types across the Meliphagidae, and that certain genera such as Acanthorhynchus and Phylidonyris have a unique tongue morphologies. Using phylogenetic generalized least square regressions, we found that tongue length (not size corrected) and the proportion of tongue that is bristled were both positively correlated to degree of nectarivory, while tongue length (relative to bill length), tongue depth (relative to bill depth) and tongue width (relative to bill width) were not correlated to nectarivory. Finally, we found no correlation between hyoid length (relative to bill length) and nectarivory, suggesting that the capacity for further tongue protrusion is unrelated to nectar dependence in honeyeaters. Similar studies should be conducted across other groups of avian nectarivores to expand our understanding of dietary ecomorphology beyond bill shape, which has been the focus of the majority of research on food handling adaptations in birds thus far.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338219
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Morphological diversity in the honeyeater hyolingual apparatus and its relationship with nectarivory

William A. Buttemer, Alejandro Rico‐Guevara, Maude W. Baldwin, Amanda A. Hewes et al.
PLoS ONE
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Morphological diversity in the honeyeater hyolingual apparatus and its relationship with nectarivory

William A. Buttemer, Alejandro Rico‐Guevara, Maude W. Baldwin, Amanda A. Hewes, Cassandra Fieldson
article en

Abstract

Honeyeaters (Aves, Meliphagidae) are a speciose clade of nectarivorous birds, and there is immense diversity in the degree to which different species within the family rely on nectar. Honeyeater tongues are commonly described as similar to a paintbrush, with this morphology being interpreted as an adaptation for increasing nectar extraction efficiency. However, there has been limited work documenting the degree of interspecific diversity in tongue morphology across the family or the extent to which such diversity correlates with dependance on nectar. This information is also lacking for the hyoid bones, the structures responsible for moving the tongue in and out of the mouth. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by examining honeyeater tongues and hyoids from across the family. We found that there are six distinct tongue types across the Meliphagidae, and that certain genera such as Acanthorhynchus and Phylidonyris have a unique tongue morphologies. Using phylogenetic generalized least square regressions, we found that tongue length (not size corrected) and the proportion of tongue that is bristled were both positively correlated to degree of nectarivory, while tongue length (relative to bill length), tongue depth (relative to bill depth) and tongue width (relative to bill width) were not correlated to nectarivory. Finally, we found no correlation between hyoid length (relative to bill length) and nectarivory, suggesting that the capacity for further tongue protrusion is unrelated to nectar dependence in honeyeaters. Similar studies should be conducted across other groups of avian nectarivores to expand our understanding of dietary ecomorphology beyond bill shape, which has been the focus of the majority of research on food handling adaptations in birds thus far.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(12)
Deakin University (AU), University of Washington (US), Max Planck Institute for Ornithology (DE), Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.