Clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma and antidepressant use: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Clinical depression is associated with immune dysregulation and reduced activity of natural killer cells and lymphocytes, which play critical roles in immune surveillance against infection and malignancy. Depression is common among cancer patients and has been linked to poor treatment adherence, impaired immune function, and increased mortality. Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with chronic immunosuppression, high symptom burden and frequent hospitalizations, all of which may amplify the impact of comorbid depression. The timing of antidepressant initiation relative to cancer diagnosis may reflect differences in disease trajectory, psychosocial burden, or underlying biology, but its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma remains poorly understood. Methods We utilized the 2025 TriNetX database to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Adult patients with multiple myeloma since 2010 and prescribed antidepressants (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, trazodone, mirtazapine, or bupropion) were identified using ICD-10 diagnostic and RxNorm codes. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: cohort 1 included those who initiated antidepressants within 6 months prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis, and cohort 2 included those who started antidepressants anytime after diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed, and outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, relapse, pathologic fracture, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Results Each cohort consisted of 23,478 patients after propensity score matching, with similar baseline characteristics. Average age at the time of index was 66 years in both groups. In cohort 1, 52% of patients were male and the ethnicity distribution was 71% White, 5% Hispanic, and 17% African-American. In cohort 2, 55% of patients were male and the ethnicity distribution was 64% White, 5% Hispanic, and 19% African-American. Upon analysis, our study found that, within the last 15 years, patients who were started on antidepressants prior to their multiple myeloma diagnosis had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.16-1.24, p < 0.0001). The same patients also had a higher risk of hospitalizations (HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.23-1.29, p < 0.0001), relapse (HR 2.83, 95% CI: 2.68-2.98, p < 0.0001), pathologic fracture (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.58-1.78, p < 0.0001), and end-stage renal disease (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09-1.25, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Our study found that patients who initiated antidepressants prior to their multiple myeloma diagnosis had a higher risk of mortality, relapse, hospitalizations, pathologic fractures, and end-stage renal disease. While some associations were modest in magnitude, the consistent pattern of increased risk suggests that pre-existing depression and its treatment may identify a more vulnerable subgroup of multiple myeloma patients. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify underlying mechanisms and to evaluate the potential impact of early psychiatric intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-8136
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma and antidepressant use: A retrospective cohort study

Angimar Uriepero, Akshay Ratnani, John Leighton, Thitiphan Srikulmontri et al.
Blood
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

Clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma and antidepressant use: A retrospective cohort study

Angimar Uriepero, Akshay Ratnani, John Leighton, Thitiphan Srikulmontri, Riley Marotta, Andrew Geller, Sam King
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical depression is associated with immune dysregulation and reduced activity of natural killer cells and lymphocytes, which play critical roles in immune surveillance against infection and malignancy. Depression is common among cancer patients and has been linked to poor treatment adherence, impaired immune function, and increased mortality. Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with chronic immunosuppression, high symptom burden and frequent hospitalizations, all of which may amplify the impact of comorbid depression. The timing of antidepressant initiation relative to cancer diagnosis may reflect differences in disease trajectory, psychosocial burden, or underlying biology, but its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma remains poorly understood. Methods We utilized the 2025 TriNetX database to conduct a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Adult patients with multiple myeloma since 2010 and prescribed antidepressants (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram, paroxetine, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, venlafaxine, duloxetine, trazodone, mirtazapine, or bupropion) were identified using ICD-10 diagnostic and RxNorm codes. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: cohort 1 included those who initiated antidepressants within 6 months prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis, and cohort 2 included those who started antidepressants anytime after diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed, and outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, relapse, pathologic fracture, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Results Each cohort consisted of 23,478 patients after propensity score matching, with similar baseline characteristics. Average age at the time of index was 66 years in both groups. In cohort 1, 52% of patients were male and the ethnicity distribution was 71% White, 5% Hispanic, and 17% African-American. In cohort 2, 55% of patients were male and the ethnicity distribution was 64% White, 5% Hispanic, and 19% African-American. Upon analysis, our study found that, within the last 15 years, patients who were started on antidepressants prior to their multiple myeloma diagnosis had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.16-1.24, p < 0.0001). The same patients also had a higher risk of hospitalizations (HR 1.26, 95% CI: 1.23-1.29, p < 0.0001), relapse (HR 2.83, 95% CI: 2.68-2.98, p < 0.0001), pathologic fracture (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.58-1.78, p < 0.0001), and end-stage renal disease (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09-1.25, p < 0.0001). Conclusion Our study found that patients who initiated antidepressants prior to their multiple myeloma diagnosis had a higher risk of mortality, relapse, hospitalizations, pathologic fractures, and end-stage renal disease. While some associations were modest in magnitude, the consistent pattern of increased risk suggests that pre-existing depression and its treatment may identify a more vulnerable subgroup of multiple myeloma patients. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify underlying mechanisms and to evaluate the potential impact of early psychiatric intervention.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
Pennsylvania Hospital (US), Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.