Thromboembolic and cardiovascular events after CAR-T cell therapy in multiple myeloma: A propensity-matched real-world analysis

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) but may increase risks of early venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) through cytokine-driven endothelial injury. Although MM and several of its treatments are known to be associated with hypercoagulability, the real-world incidence of these events post–CAR-T remains unclear. This study aims to compare the 90-day risk of VTE, stroke, and MI in MM patients receiving CAR-T versus matched non–CAR-T controls using a large multi-institutional database. Methods We conducted a retrospective, real-world cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, which included electronic health records from 69 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with MM diagnosed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2024, were identified. The study includes two cohorts of patients with confirmed MM identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code C90.0. The CAR-T cohort consists of patients who received CAR-T (n=1,393), defined by the procedure code “CAR-T Administration”. The non-CAR-T cohort includes patients who did not receive CAR-T therapy (n=118,370). Outcomes of interest were analyzed as a composite outcome: VTE, stroke, MI, and acute limb ischemia (ALI) within 90 days of the CAR-T administration or matched MM diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed across key demographics, comorbidities, baseline cardiovascular risk factors, and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant before CAR-T cell therapy which yielded two balanced cohorts of 1,389 patients each. Risk ratios, odds ratios, and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were generated, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Following propensity score matching, 1,389 patients were included in each cohort, ensuring balance across demographics and comorbidities. Within 90 days of the index event, VTE occurred in 171 CAR-T recipients compared with 126 in the non–CAR-T control group, corresponding to an absolute risk increase of 3.2% (12.3% vs. 9.1%), a 36% relative risk increase (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09–1.69, p=0.006), and a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% CI 1.04–1.66, p=0.018). Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated increased occurrence of VTE in the CAR-T group, with sustained higher VTE incidence in the CAR-T group throughout follow-up. Stroke risk was numerically increased but did not reach statistical significance, occurring in 37 CAR-T patients versus 32 controls (2.7% vs. 2.3%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.73–1.85, p=0.54; HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.70–1.80, p=0.63). Myocardial infarction rates were similar between groups (1.9% vs. 2.1%; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.53–1.55, p=0.72), as were ALI events (0.6% vs. 0.5%; RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.45–3.21, p=0.71), though both outcomes were rare. Conclusion In this large, propensity-matched analysis of real-world data, CAR-T therapy for MM was associated with a significantly increased 90-day risk of VTE, with a higher event burden per affected patient, compared with non–CAR-T controls. On the other hand, rates of stroke, MI, and ALI were low and were not significantly different between the two cohort groups. Closer clinical monitoring, early patient mobilization, and use of thromboprophylaxis may help with early detection and prevention of VTE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-2249
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thromboembolic and cardiovascular events after CAR-T cell therapy in multiple myeloma: A propensity-matched real-world analysis

Wahid Aloweiwi, Moaath K. Mustafa Ali, F. Anaya, Mohammed Aloqaily et al.
Blood
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Thromboembolic and cardiovascular events after CAR-T cell therapy in multiple myeloma: A propensity-matched real-world analysis

Wahid Aloweiwi, Moaath K. Mustafa Ali, F. Anaya, Mohammed Aloqaily, Shishir Sinha, Abdo Haddad, Moath Albliwi, Mustafa Tawaha, Hamed Daw, Kirti Arora, Ayham Hussein, Faris Naffa, Rahaf Yaghi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) but may increase risks of early venous thromboembolism (VTE), stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) through cytokine-driven endothelial injury. Although MM and several of its treatments are known to be associated with hypercoagulability, the real-world incidence of these events post–CAR-T remains unclear. This study aims to compare the 90-day risk of VTE, stroke, and MI in MM patients receiving CAR-T versus matched non–CAR-T controls using a large multi-institutional database. Methods We conducted a retrospective, real-world cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, which included electronic health records from 69 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with MM diagnosed between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2024, were identified. The study includes two cohorts of patients with confirmed MM identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code C90.0. The CAR-T cohort consists of patients who received CAR-T (n=1,393), defined by the procedure code “CAR-T Administration”. The non-CAR-T cohort includes patients who did not receive CAR-T therapy (n=118,370). Outcomes of interest were analyzed as a composite outcome: VTE, stroke, MI, and acute limb ischemia (ALI) within 90 days of the CAR-T administration or matched MM diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed across key demographics, comorbidities, baseline cardiovascular risk factors, and the use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant before CAR-T cell therapy which yielded two balanced cohorts of 1,389 patients each. Risk ratios, odds ratios, and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were generated, with statistical significance set at p<0.05. Results Following propensity score matching, 1,389 patients were included in each cohort, ensuring balance across demographics and comorbidities. Within 90 days of the index event, VTE occurred in 171 CAR-T recipients compared with 126 in the non–CAR-T control group, corresponding to an absolute risk increase of 3.2% (12.3% vs. 9.1%), a 36% relative risk increase (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.09–1.69, p=0.006), and a hazard ratio of 1.32 (95% CI 1.04–1.66, p=0.018). Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated increased occurrence of VTE in the CAR-T group, with sustained higher VTE incidence in the CAR-T group throughout follow-up. Stroke risk was numerically increased but did not reach statistical significance, occurring in 37 CAR-T patients versus 32 controls (2.7% vs. 2.3%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.73–1.85, p=0.54; HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.70–1.80, p=0.63). Myocardial infarction rates were similar between groups (1.9% vs. 2.1%; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.53–1.55, p=0.72), as were ALI events (0.6% vs. 0.5%; RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.45–3.21, p=0.71), though both outcomes were rare. Conclusion In this large, propensity-matched analysis of real-world data, CAR-T therapy for MM was associated with a significantly increased 90-day risk of VTE, with a higher event burden per affected patient, compared with non–CAR-T controls. On the other hand, rates of stroke, MI, and ALI were low and were not significantly different between the two cohort groups. Closer clinical monitoring, early patient mobilization, and use of thromboprophylaxis may help with early detection and prevention of VTE.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of Jordan (JO), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), MetroHealth (US), Saint Agnes Hospital (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Foundation (US), Richmond University Medical Center (US), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO), Irbid National University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.