Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP followed by maintenance in untreated ABC-DLBCL patients with IPI ≥2: A first analysis of phase II Study  FIL_RI-CHOP

Abstract Background: Patients with activated (ABC) subtype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibit inferior outcomes following R-CHOP treatment. Current evidence indicates that covalent irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown higher responses in non-germinal center (non-GCB) DLBCLs compared to GCB. In untreated non-GCB DLBCLs, phase 3 PHOENIX study (Younes et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:1285-95) showed that adding ibrutinib (I) to R-CHOP (R-CHOP-I) did not improve outcomes in the intent-to-treat population. However, patients aged < 60y treated with R-CHOP-I experienced significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those receiving R-CHOP alone. The FIL_RI-CHOP trial aims to assess whether combining R-CHOP-I, followed by ibrutinib maintenance, is safe and improves PFS in young, untreated patients with high-risk ABC DLBCL. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial enrolling patients aged ≥18 and <65 years with newly diagnosed ABC-DLBCL at poor prognosis (IPI ≥2). An initial R-CHOP cycle (cycle 1) was permitted as standard-of-care (step 1), to allow timely treatment initiation while a central pathology review and Cell of Origin (COO) assessment were performed. COO subtyping was determined using the NanoString's Lymphoma Subtyping (LST) gene expression signature. Patients with confirmed ABC-DLBCL (step 2) received the experimental treatment (R-CHOP + Ibrutinib 560 mg/day continuously) from cycle 2 to cycle 6, followed by two additional cycles of rituximab plus ibrutinib (cycles 7 and 8), and 18 months of ibrutinib maintenance for those achieving at least partial response post-induction. The primary endpoint is 2-year PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), complete (CRR), event-free survival (EFS), OS and safety. This preliminary analysis evaluates safety and response rate at the end of induction (EOI). Results: From July 2019 to August 2024, 279 patients were registered across 39 Fondazione Italiana linfomi (FIL) sites; 215 (76%) fulfilled eligibility criteria, were enrolled in step1, and received R-CHOP while awaiting the COO results. COO was classified as GCB in 139 of 215 patients (65%) and as ABC in 75 of 215 patients (35%), with 28/75 (37%) being double expressors. Among ABC-DLBCL cases, concordance with the Hans algorithm was 95% (71/75). All 75 ABC-DLBCLs proceeded to Step 2, and received experimental treatment. Median age was 57 years (IQR 50–60); 58.7% were male. Advanced Ann Arbor stage (III–IV) was observed in 72 of 75 patients (96%), elevated LDH levels in 58 (77.3%), involvement of ≥2 extranodal sites in 33 (44%) and IPI > 2 in 34 (46%). After 4 cycles, interim total-body CT scan showed an ORR of 90.7%, with 21.3% (16/ 75) complete responses (CR) and 69.3% (52/75) partial responses. At the EOI, assessed by PET-CT, ORR was 85.33% with a metabolic CR of 72%. A total of 64 patients initiated ibrutinib maintenance. Eleven patients (14.6%) discontinued treatment during the induction phase, prior to initiating maintenance therapy. Reasons for discontinuations were: disease progressions in 5 (6.6%), consent withdrawal in 2 (2.6%), and adverse events (AEs) in 4 (5.3%) – including 1 sudden death, 1 covid infection, 1 prolonged cytopenia and 1 gastrointestinal disorders. Neutropenia was the most common hematological toxicity (grade 3–4 per cycle: 6%; per patient: 13%), whereas febrile neutropenia was rare (≤2%). Extra-hematological AEs were primarily low-grade gastrointestinal and neurological disorders. Three cardiac events (grade 1-2) were reported; infections occurred in 24% of patients. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that central pathology review and NanoString's LST COO assessment are feasible without delaying treatment initiation. The addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP appears feasible and effective, achieving >70% metabolic CR with a manageable safety profile in young, high-risk ABC-DLBCL patients. R-CHOP plus ibrutinib may represent a safe, effective, and potentially cost-effective treatment strategy in this population. Final results including the impact of ibrutinib maintenance will be presented at the meeting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood
Published
2025-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-55
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP followed by maintenance in untreated ABC-DLBCL patients with IPI ≥2: A first analysis of phase II Study  FIL_RI-CHOP

Umberto Vitolo, Sara Galimberti, Federica Cavallo, Elsa Pennese et al.
Blood
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
article

Ibrutinib plus R-CHOP followed by maintenance in untreated ABC-DLBCL patients with IPI ≥2: A first analysis of phase II Study  FIL_RI-CHOP

Umberto Vitolo, Sara Galimberti, Federica Cavallo, Elsa Pennese, Stefan Hohaus, Alessandra Dondi, Mariella Lo Schirico, Monica Tani, Elisa Lucchini, Donato Mannina, Maurizio Martelli, Guido Gini, Andrea Evangelista, Marta Coscia, Arcangelo Liso, Benedetta Puccini, Claudia Peracchio, Chiara Pagani, Annalisa Arcari, Annalisa Chiappella, Mattia Novo, Sara Veronica Usai, Attilio Guarini, Valentina Tabanelli, Alice Di Rocco, Anna Mele, Emanuele Ravano, Jacopo Olivieri, Ausilia Gorgone, Francesco Merli, A Merli, Manuela Zanni, Chiara Ghiggi, Michele Cimminiello, Michele Spina, Andrés J.M. Ferreri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patients with activated (ABC) subtype diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibit inferior outcomes following R-CHOP treatment. Current evidence indicates that covalent irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown higher responses in non-germinal center (non-GCB) DLBCLs compared to GCB. In untreated non-GCB DLBCLs, phase 3 PHOENIX study (Younes et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37:1285-95) showed that adding ibrutinib (I) to R-CHOP (R-CHOP-I) did not improve outcomes in the intent-to-treat population. However, patients aged < 60y treated with R-CHOP-I experienced significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those receiving R-CHOP alone. The FIL_RI-CHOP trial aims to assess whether combining R-CHOP-I, followed by ibrutinib maintenance, is safe and improves PFS in young, untreated patients with high-risk ABC DLBCL. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial enrolling patients aged ≥18 and <65 years with newly diagnosed ABC-DLBCL at poor prognosis (IPI ≥2). An initial R-CHOP cycle (cycle 1) was permitted as standard-of-care (step 1), to allow timely treatment initiation while a central pathology review and Cell of Origin (COO) assessment were performed. COO subtyping was determined using the NanoString's Lymphoma Subtyping (LST) gene expression signature. Patients with confirmed ABC-DLBCL (step 2) received the experimental treatment (R-CHOP + Ibrutinib 560 mg/day continuously) from cycle 2 to cycle 6, followed by two additional cycles of rituximab plus ibrutinib (cycles 7 and 8), and 18 months of ibrutinib maintenance for those achieving at least partial response post-induction. The primary endpoint is 2-year PFS. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), complete (CRR), event-free survival (EFS), OS and safety. This preliminary analysis evaluates safety and response rate at the end of induction (EOI). Results: From July 2019 to August 2024, 279 patients were registered across 39 Fondazione Italiana linfomi (FIL) sites; 215 (76%) fulfilled eligibility criteria, were enrolled in step1, and received R-CHOP while awaiting the COO results. COO was classified as GCB in 139 of 215 patients (65%) and as ABC in 75 of 215 patients (35%), with 28/75 (37%) being double expressors. Among ABC-DLBCL cases, concordance with the Hans algorithm was 95% (71/75). All 75 ABC-DLBCLs proceeded to Step 2, and received experimental treatment. Median age was 57 years (IQR 50–60); 58.7% were male. Advanced Ann Arbor stage (III–IV) was observed in 72 of 75 patients (96%), elevated LDH levels in 58 (77.3%), involvement of ≥2 extranodal sites in 33 (44%) and IPI > 2 in 34 (46%). After 4 cycles, interim total-body CT scan showed an ORR of 90.7%, with 21.3% (16/ 75) complete responses (CR) and 69.3% (52/75) partial responses. At the EOI, assessed by PET-CT, ORR was 85.33% with a metabolic CR of 72%. A total of 64 patients initiated ibrutinib maintenance. Eleven patients (14.6%) discontinued treatment during the induction phase, prior to initiating maintenance therapy. Reasons for discontinuations were: disease progressions in 5 (6.6%), consent withdrawal in 2 (2.6%), and adverse events (AEs) in 4 (5.3%) – including 1 sudden death, 1 covid infection, 1 prolonged cytopenia and 1 gastrointestinal disorders. Neutropenia was the most common hematological toxicity (grade 3–4 per cycle: 6%; per patient: 13%), whereas febrile neutropenia was rare (≤2%). Extra-hematological AEs were primarily low-grade gastrointestinal and neurological disorders. Three cardiac events (grade 1-2) were reported; infections occurred in 24% of patients. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that central pathology review and NanoString's LST COO assessment are feasible without delaying treatment initiation. The addition of ibrutinib to R-CHOP appears feasible and effective, achieving >70% metabolic CR with a manageable safety profile in young, high-risk ABC-DLBCL patients. R-CHOP plus ibrutinib may represent a safe, effective, and potentially cost-effective treatment strategy in this population. Final results including the impact of ibrutinib maintenance will be presented at the meeting.

BloodVol. 146(Supplement 1)
University of Pisa (IT), University of Insubria (IT), University of Cagliari (IT), University of Milan (IT), University of Perugia (IT), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Ospedale Garibaldi (IT), Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona (IT), Ospedale di Santo Spirito (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Regione Siciliana (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria (IT), National Cancer Institute (UA), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT), Fondazione Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi Onlus (IT), Ospedale Infermi di Rimini (IT), Istituto Tumori Bari (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT), Ospedale degli Infermi (IT), ASM Terni (Italy) (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Papardo Piemonte (IT), University of Turin (IT), European Institute of Oncology (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.