Who thrives in Canada? An Examination of social factors, healthcare access, and immigration status

High-income countries like Canada report some of the worlds' highest life-satisfaction levels, yet less is known about how life satisfaction varies by race and immigration status. This study investigates the factors that influence subjective well-being among 8,063 adults from the Canadian Alliance of Healthy Hearts and Minds study recruited between 2014 and 2018, including a subset of 2,142 immigrants. Measures of demographic, socioeconomic, health, healthcare access, and self-reported ethnicity were investigated in relation to self-reported life satisfaction as measured by the validated Cantril ladder score in which people were classified as suffering [1-4], struggling [5-6], or thriving [7-10]. Among 8,063 adults, approximately half were women, 18.6% were racialized, and 26.6% were immigrants. The mean life satisfaction score was 7.2 (1.4), with 71% classified as thriving. However racialized immigrants reported significantly lower life satisfaction than Canadian born non-racialized participants [6.6 (1.6) vs 7.2 (1.4); P < 0.001, and a lower proportion were classified as thriving [57% vs 73%]. In the overall sample, multivariable linear regression showed higher life satisfaction was associated with older age, male sex, having trusted neighbours, and having a language-concordant family doctor. Lower life satisfaction was associated with social disadvantage, being female, having poorer cardiovascular health, being unable to afford prescription medications, seeking care in an emergency department, and being racialized. Amongst the subset of immigrants, the life satisfaction associated factors were directionally consistent and racialized immigrants reported lower life satisfaction due to discrimination based on skin colour. Although Canada has amongst the highest life-satisfaction scores globally, the average masks persistent inequities as racialized people (especially racialized immigrants) have lower life satisfaction than non-racialized people. The findings highlight actionable levers-language-concordant primary care attachment, affordable medications, neighbourhood trust, and improved cardiometabolic health-that can be targeted to close the observed well-being gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005257
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who thrives in Canada? An Examination of social factors, healthcare access, and immigration status

Jennifer E. Vena, Trevor Dummer, Shrina Patel, Paul Poirier et al.
1 citations
PLOS Global Public Health
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
article

Who thrives in Canada? An Examination of social factors, healthcare access, and immigration status

Jennifer E. Vena, Trevor Dummer, Shrina Patel, Paul Poirier, Vikki Ho, Matthias G. Friedrich, Scott A. Lear, Sonia S. Anand, Karleen M. Schulze, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Dipika Desai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

High-income countries like Canada report some of the worlds' highest life-satisfaction levels, yet less is known about how life satisfaction varies by race and immigration status. This study investigates the factors that influence subjective well-being among 8,063 adults from the Canadian Alliance of Healthy Hearts and Minds study recruited between 2014 and 2018, including a subset of 2,142 immigrants. Measures of demographic, socioeconomic, health, healthcare access, and self-reported ethnicity were investigated in relation to self-reported life satisfaction as measured by the validated Cantril ladder score in which people were classified as suffering [1-4], struggling [5-6], or thriving [7-10]. Among 8,063 adults, approximately half were women, 18.6% were racialized, and 26.6% were immigrants. The mean life satisfaction score was 7.2 (1.4), with 71% classified as thriving. However racialized immigrants reported significantly lower life satisfaction than Canadian born non-racialized participants [6.6 (1.6) vs 7.2 (1.4); P < 0.001, and a lower proportion were classified as thriving [57% vs 73%]. In the overall sample, multivariable linear regression showed higher life satisfaction was associated with older age, male sex, having trusted neighbours, and having a language-concordant family doctor. Lower life satisfaction was associated with social disadvantage, being female, having poorer cardiovascular health, being unable to afford prescription medications, seeking care in an emergency department, and being racialized. Amongst the subset of immigrants, the life satisfaction associated factors were directionally consistent and racialized immigrants reported lower life satisfaction due to discrimination based on skin colour. Although Canada has amongst the highest life-satisfaction scores globally, the average masks persistent inequities as racialized people (especially racialized immigrants) have lower life satisfaction than non-racialized people. The findings highlight actionable levers-language-concordant primary care attachment, affordable medications, neighbourhood trust, and improved cardiometabolic health-that can be targeted to close the observed well-being gap.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 5(12)
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), Montreal Heart Institute (CA), McMaster University Medical Centre (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Population Health Research Institute (CA), Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.