Untangling the Sources of Abundance Dispersion in Low-metallicity Stars. II. Neutron Capture Elements

Abstract We present the abundances of 23 elements, including 11 heavy elements (Cu, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm, and Eu) for up to 86 metal-poor (−2 ≲ [Fe/H] ≲ −1) subgiants. We use KORG, a state of the art spectral synthesis package, to derive 1D-LTE abundances from high-SNR and high-resolution spectra taken by the Large Binocular Telescope with the Potsdam Echelle Polarimetric and Spectroscopic Instrument. These precise spectra and abundance measurements minimize the impact of photon noise (≲0.06 dex), allowing us to robustly measure the intrinsic abundance scatter in [X/Fe]. After removing two stars with exceptional s -process enhancement, we find that the intrinsic scatter among the s - and r -process elements tends to be larger than for the lighter elements, with heavy element scatter ranging from 0.11 (Zn) to 0.27 (Eu) dex. Intrinsic abundance scatter could have multiple origins, including star-to-star variations in the ratios of nucleosynthetic sources as well as stochastic sampling of the progenitor supernovae properties, such as mass, rotation, and magnetic field strength. We explore the expected abundance scatter signature caused by stochastic sampling, finding that a fraction of both rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae and magnetorotationally driven supernova are needed to reach the observed abundances and intrinsic scatter. This analysis is limited by the restrictive parameter spaces spanned by existing yield sets. A diverse, finely sampled grid of supernovae yields is needed to robustly model stochastic abundance scatter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae4e24
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Untangling the Sources of Abundance Dispersion in Low-metallicity Stars. II. Neutron Capture Elements

Tawny Sit, David H. Weinberg, Ilya Ilyin, K. G. Strassmeier et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Untangling the Sources of Abundance Dispersion in Low-metallicity Stars. II. Neutron Capture Elements

Tawny Sit, David H. Weinberg, Ilya Ilyin, K. G. Strassmeier, Jennifer A. Johnson, Emily J. Griffith
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present the abundances of 23 elements, including 11 heavy elements (Cu, Zn, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Nd, Sm, and Eu) for up to 86 metal-poor (−2 ≲ [Fe/H] ≲ −1) subgiants. We use KORG, a state of the art spectral synthesis package, to derive 1D-LTE abundances from high-SNR and high-resolution spectra taken by the Large Binocular Telescope with the Potsdam Echelle Polarimetric and Spectroscopic Instrument. These precise spectra and abundance measurements minimize the impact of photon noise (≲0.06 dex), allowing us to robustly measure the intrinsic abundance scatter in [X/Fe]. After removing two stars with exceptional s -process enhancement, we find that the intrinsic scatter among the s - and r -process elements tends to be larger than for the lighter elements, with heavy element scatter ranging from 0.11 (Zn) to 0.27 (Eu) dex. Intrinsic abundance scatter could have multiple origins, including star-to-star variations in the ratios of nucleosynthetic sources as well as stochastic sampling of the progenitor supernovae properties, such as mass, rotation, and magnetic field strength. We explore the expected abundance scatter signature caused by stochastic sampling, finding that a fraction of both rapidly rotating core-collapse supernovae and magnetorotationally driven supernova are needed to reach the observed abundances and intrinsic scatter. This analysis is limited by the restrictive parameter spaces spanned by existing yield sets. A diverse, finely sampled grid of supernovae yields is needed to robustly model stochastic abundance scatter.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 1001(2)
Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (US), Leibniz Institute for Astrophysics Potsdam (DE), Institute for Advanced Study (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.