Artificial Intelligence in CT Imaging: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Decision–Support Impact, and Integration Pathways

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming radiology and computed tomography (CT) imaging by enabling automated image analysis, improved diagnostic accuracy, and clinical decision–support. We performed a systematic review of peer‐reviewed studies published between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2025 to quantify reported gains in diagnostic performance and workflow efficiency, to evaluate clinical decision–support benefits and risks, and to identify integration priorities. We searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar and screened 128 records; 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included study design, AI architecture, sample size, and quantitative performance metrics; study quality was assessed using Newcastle–Ottawa Scales (NOS), Cochrane RoB 2, or AMSTAR 2 as appropriate. Across included studies, AI applications in CT showed consistent improvements in sensitivity, specificity, and time‐to‐diagnosis in specific tasks (notably lung‐nodule detection and intracranial hemorrhage triage), with reported detection‐rate increases up to ∼20% and reduced turnaround times in several real‐world implementations. Barriers include dataset bias, limited external validation, interpretability (“black‐box”) concerns, workflow integration challenges, and evolving regulatory issues. Economic analyses suggest potentially favorable return on investment (ROI) in high‐volume settings but are sensitive to licensing and infrastructure costs. To realize AI's benefits in CT imaging, rigorous multi‐center validation, transparent reporting, human‐centered workflow design, and post‐deployment surveillance are essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iRadiology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird3.70046
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in CT Imaging: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Decision–Support Impact, and Integration Pathways

Kirolos Eskandar
iRadiology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Artificial Intelligence in CT Imaging: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Decision–Support Impact, and Integration Pathways

Kirolos Eskandar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming radiology and computed tomography (CT) imaging by enabling automated image analysis, improved diagnostic accuracy, and clinical decision–support. We performed a systematic review of peer‐reviewed studies published between January 1, 2010 and March 31, 2025 to quantify reported gains in diagnostic performance and workflow efficiency, to evaluate clinical decision–support benefits and risks, and to identify integration priorities. We searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar and screened 128 records; 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included study design, AI architecture, sample size, and quantitative performance metrics; study quality was assessed using Newcastle–Ottawa Scales (NOS), Cochrane RoB 2, or AMSTAR 2 as appropriate. Across included studies, AI applications in CT showed consistent improvements in sensitivity, specificity, and time‐to‐diagnosis in specific tasks (notably lung‐nodule detection and intracranial hemorrhage triage), with reported detection‐rate increases up to ∼20% and reduced turnaround times in several real‐world implementations. Barriers include dataset bias, limited external validation, interpretability (“black‐box”) concerns, workflow integration challenges, and evolving regulatory issues. Economic analyses suggest potentially favorable return on investment (ROI) in high‐volume settings but are sensitive to licensing and infrastructure costs. To realize AI's benefits in CT imaging, rigorous multi‐center validation, transparent reporting, human‐centered workflow design, and post‐deployment surveillance are essential.

iRadiologyVol. 3(6)
Helwan University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.