Development and validation of a questionnaire on teachers’ beliefs and practices in enacting competency-based English teaching curriculum

Objectives To develop and validate a questionnaire that captures Vietnamese English high school teachers’ beliefs and practices in implementing CBETC.Methods There are 517 Vietnamese English high school teachers in this study. The factors associated with beliefs and practices measured were the nature and goals of CBETC, instructional design practice, providing personalized instruction, integrating various teaching methods, controlling mastery-based progression, evaluating student learning outcomes, and providing feedback to students on their progress. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate validity and Cronbach’s alpha (α) to test reliability.Results Teachers’ beliefs contained two factors with seven items: understanding of the nature of CBETC and beliefs about the goals of CBETC (KMO = 0.79, Bartlett’s test <0.001, Chi-square/df = 1.920, CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.042, PCLOSE = 0.665, α = 0.75). Teachers’ practices included six factors with 21 items: designing instructional activities, personalizing instruction, employing various instructional strategies, managing mastery-based progression, student learning outcomes, and providing feedback to students on their progress (KMO = 0.83, Bartlett’s test =0.000, Chi-square/df = 1.216, GFI = 0.961, CFI = 0.958, RMSEA = 0.020, PCLOSE= 1.000, α = 0.84).Conclusions The questionnaire exhibited satisfactory validity and reliability and can be recommended for studies investigating teachers’ beliefs and practices in CBETC enactment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2025.2590884
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire on teachers’ beliefs and practices in enacting competency-based English teaching curriculum

Thao Quoc Tran, Thanh Vinh Chau
Cogent Education
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Development and validation of a questionnaire on teachers’ beliefs and practices in enacting competency-based English teaching curriculum

Thao Quoc Tran, Thanh Vinh Chau
article en

Abstract

Objectives To develop and validate a questionnaire that captures Vietnamese English high school teachers’ beliefs and practices in implementing CBETC.Methods There are 517 Vietnamese English high school teachers in this study. The factors associated with beliefs and practices measured were the nature and goals of CBETC, instructional design practice, providing personalized instruction, integrating various teaching methods, controlling mastery-based progression, evaluating student learning outcomes, and providing feedback to students on their progress. Exploratory factor analysis was used to evaluate validity and Cronbach’s alpha (α) to test reliability.Results Teachers’ beliefs contained two factors with seven items: understanding of the nature of CBETC and beliefs about the goals of CBETC (KMO = 0.79, Bartlett’s test <0.001, Chi-square/df = 1.920, CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.992, RMSEA = 0.042, PCLOSE = 0.665, α = 0.75). Teachers’ practices included six factors with 21 items: designing instructional activities, personalizing instruction, employing various instructional strategies, managing mastery-based progression, student learning outcomes, and providing feedback to students on their progress (KMO = 0.83, Bartlett’s test =0.000, Chi-square/df = 1.216, GFI = 0.961, CFI = 0.958, RMSEA = 0.020, PCLOSE= 1.000, α = 0.84).Conclusions The questionnaire exhibited satisfactory validity and reliability and can be recommended for studies investigating teachers’ beliefs and practices in CBETC enactment.

Cogent EducationVol. 12(1)
Ho Chi Minh City Open University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.