Global shocks, institutional development, and trade restrictions: What can we learn from crises and recoveries between 1990 and 2022?

The Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic were two major shocks to the world economy in the 21st century. In this study, we analyze the patterns of recessions and recoveries of 101 advanced and developing economies. We identify the turning points of recessions and expansions between 1990 and 2022, and perform cross-country analysis of domestic and external drivers of economic recovery. In addition to the standard independent variables, we include institutional development, political stability, the extent of democracy, and trade restrictions indexes, and explore their roles in explaining recessions and recovery patterns. For the whole sample, we find that deeper recessions are followed by stronger recoveries, in line with Friedman’s plucking model of the business cycle. However, the empirical evidence for the plucking model becomes weaker if institutional development is limited and trade restrictions are high. We show that recessions that create conflict and trade tensions differ sharply from those that do not, a relevant finding in the current global climate of heightened trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty. Finally, since developing countries tend to have weaker institutions and higher trade barriers, our evidence suggests that countercyclical monetary and fiscal policy will have to play a bigger role in cushioning global shocks in those countries. This, in turn, requires more robust and credible monetary and fiscal policy frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Money and Finance
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103504
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global shocks, institutional development, and trade restrictions: What can we learn from crises and recoveries between 1990 and 2022?

Hiro Ito, Gazi Salah Uddin, Jamel Saadaoui, Joshua Aizenman et al.
Journal of International Money and Finance
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
article

Global shocks, institutional development, and trade restrictions: What can we learn from crises and recoveries between 1990 and 2022?

Hiro Ito, Gazi Salah Uddin, Jamel Saadaoui, Joshua Aizenman, Donghyun Park
article en

Abstract

The Global Financial Crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic were two major shocks to the world economy in the 21st century. In this study, we analyze the patterns of recessions and recoveries of 101 advanced and developing economies. We identify the turning points of recessions and expansions between 1990 and 2022, and perform cross-country analysis of domestic and external drivers of economic recovery. In addition to the standard independent variables, we include institutional development, political stability, the extent of democracy, and trade restrictions indexes, and explore their roles in explaining recessions and recovery patterns. For the whole sample, we find that deeper recessions are followed by stronger recoveries, in line with Friedman’s plucking model of the business cycle. However, the empirical evidence for the plucking model becomes weaker if institutional development is limited and trade restrictions are high. We show that recessions that create conflict and trade tensions differ sharply from those that do not, a relevant finding in the current global climate of heightened trade tensions and geopolitical uncertainty. Finally, since developing countries tend to have weaker institutions and higher trade barriers, our evidence suggests that countercyclical monetary and fiscal policy will have to play a bigger role in cushioning global shocks in those countries. This, in turn, requires more robust and credible monetary and fiscal policy frameworks.

Journal of International Money and FinanceVol. 161
Linköping University (SE), University of Southern California (US), Portland State University (US), Asian Development Bank (PH), Université Paris 8 (FR), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.