Mate desertion affects offspring survival, development and physiology in a songbird with multiple parental strategies
Abstract Sexual conflict affects the amount and duration of offspring care each parent invests, resulting in multiple parental care strategies sometimes coexisting within a single population. Understanding the persistence of multiple parental care strategies requires a precise estimate of the benefits and costs associated with parental decisions. Even though the benefits of brood desertion are well known, the reproductive costs of desertion ( i.e., nestlings' physiological conditions and survival), are less explored. We use rock sparrows, Petronia petronia , a species in which both uniparental and biparental care occur in the same population, to investigate the costs of brood desertion. Specifically, we continuously monitored breeding attempts to explore the behavioural mechanisms (desertion decision and compensatory responses) and the reproductive and physiological consequences (offspring corticosterone concentrations, oxidative stress, telomere attrition) of parental care strategies. We show that male desertion was not related to the initial value of the brood (clutch size, brood size) but was associated with a reduction in the survival probability of the nestlings. Females caring alone increased their per capita feeding rate, partially compensating for the lack of male care. Nestlings deserted earlier also experienced higher oxidative stress and had higher corticosterone concentrations during the early stages of development, but these effects did not persist to fledging, and there were no differences in telomere attrition. Our findings indicate combined reproductive and physiological costs associated with brood desertion. Considering these costs is essential to understand the evolution and persistence of polymorphic patterns of care. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Authors
- Matteo Beccardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4495-6907)
- Jenny Q. Ouyang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-5145)
- Alejandro Corregidor‐Castro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7666-2153)
- Matteo Griggio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-2905)
- Lia Zampa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5073-9212)
- Davide Baldan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-4311)
- Andrea Pilastro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-6308)
- Manuel Fuertes‐Recuero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-8791)
- Valentina Alaasam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-6780)
- Alessandro Grapputo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-4294)
- Alejandro Cantarero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-701X)
- Matteo Schiavinato (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8377-4053)
Institutions
- Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Institute of Avian Research (DE)
- New York University (US)
- Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Functional Ecology
- Published
- 2025-12-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70194
- Primary Topic
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Università degli Studi di Padova