Interviews in the Recruitment of Student Midwives and Nurses: Safeguard or Artefact of Unconscious Bias? A Brief Commentary

Midwives and nurses are integral to the quality and safety of patient care. However, there is a limited amount of critical discussion and debate about the use of interviews to recruit people to study for these professions. There are some reports of people who are marginalised, minoritised, or racialised, being denied the opportunity to study for a degree in these professions, despite meeting the requisite entry requirements. Therefore, this commentary analyses the contemporary narrative and discussion relating to the role of interviews in recruiting student midwives and nurses. This critical analysis uses the UK as a case study and promulgates an alternative approach that could result in a more diverse workforce and enhance patient safety. It is hoped that the critical analytical approach taken in this paper will inspire those involved in recruitment to midwifery and nursing to consider the efficacy, utility, and equity of recruitment interviews and their impact on who is or is not afforded the opportunity to pursue a career in these professions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Medical Education
Published
2025-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ime4040053
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interviews in the Recruitment of Student Midwives and Nurses: Safeguard or Artefact of Unconscious Bias? A Brief Commentary

Ray Samuriwo
International Medical Education
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Interviews in the Recruitment of Student Midwives and Nurses: Safeguard or Artefact of Unconscious Bias? A Brief Commentary

Ray Samuriwo
article en

Abstract

Midwives and nurses are integral to the quality and safety of patient care. However, there is a limited amount of critical discussion and debate about the use of interviews to recruit people to study for these professions. There are some reports of people who are marginalised, minoritised, or racialised, being denied the opportunity to study for a degree in these professions, despite meeting the requisite entry requirements. Therefore, this commentary analyses the contemporary narrative and discussion relating to the role of interviews in recruiting student midwives and nurses. This critical analysis uses the UK as a case study and promulgates an alternative approach that could result in a more diverse workforce and enhance patient safety. It is hoped that the critical analytical approach taken in this paper will inspire those involved in recruitment to midwifery and nursing to consider the efficacy, utility, and equity of recruitment interviews and their impact on who is or is not afforded the opportunity to pursue a career in these professions.

International Medical EducationVol. 4(4)
Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interviews in the Recruitment of Student Midwives and Nurses: Safeguard or Artefact of Unconscious Bias? A Brief Commentary — Ray Samuriwo · International Medical Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS