Tracking decarbonization of multilateral development banks’ electricity generation investments

Multilateral development banks' (MDBs) commitment to the Paris Agreement (PA) was expected to induce a shift from fossil fuel-based to sustainable energy sources in the Global South. However, we lack a comprehensive analysis of their electricity generation portfolios and internal policies since then. This paper presents two new datasets on 1,230 electricity generation investments and 215 decarbonization policies adopted by all MDBs from 2006 to 2020. We find a continued decline in fossil fuel investment since the PA but no change in pace. The volume of investment in renewables (including hydropower) has not increased enough to compensate for the phaseout, resulting in a downward trend in MDB electricity generation investments over time. The number of renewable projects funded by MDBs, however, has substantially grown. These findings raise concerns about MDBs' ability to scale up clean electricity investments, particularly in low-income countries, where the energy investment gap continues to grow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Sustainability
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100584
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracking decarbonization of multilateral development banks’ electricity generation investments

Tim Büthe, Nadine Palmowski, Tobias S. Schmidt, Florian Egli et al.
Cell Reports Sustainability
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Tracking decarbonization of multilateral development banks’ electricity generation investments

Tim Büthe, Nadine Palmowski, Tobias S. Schmidt, Florian Egli, Clemens-Maria Lehofer
article en

Abstract

Multilateral development banks' (MDBs) commitment to the Paris Agreement (PA) was expected to induce a shift from fossil fuel-based to sustainable energy sources in the Global South. However, we lack a comprehensive analysis of their electricity generation portfolios and internal policies since then. This paper presents two new datasets on 1,230 electricity generation investments and 215 decarbonization policies adopted by all MDBs from 2006 to 2020. We find a continued decline in fossil fuel investment since the PA but no change in pace. The volume of investment in renewables (including hydropower) has not increased enough to compensate for the phaseout, resulting in a downward trend in MDB electricity generation investments over time. The number of renewable projects funded by MDBs, however, has substantially grown. These findings raise concerns about MDBs' ability to scale up clean electricity investments, particularly in low-income countries, where the energy investment gap continues to grow.

Cell Reports SustainabilityVol. 2(12)
Duke University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.