Mechanical Performance of Wool-Reinforced Epoxy Composites: Tensile, Flexural, Compressive, and Impact Analysis

This study situates washed sheep-wool fibres as a sustainable reinforcement candidate for epoxy matrices and evaluates their mechanical response under tensile, flexural, compressive, and Charpy impact loading. The objective of this work is to assess whether short, washed sheep-wool fibres can function as a sustainable reinforcement for epoxy matrices, and to identify optimal fibre length-content windows that improve mechanical behaviour for engineering applications. Moulded-machined specimens were produced with fibre lengths of 3, 6, and 10 mm and contents of 1.0-5.0 wt.%, depending on the test; neat epoxy served as the reference. In tension, selected formulations-particularly 10 mm/1.5 wt.%-showed simultaneous increases in ultimate stress and modulus relative to the neat resin, corresponding to gains of about 10% in ultimate tensile stress and 50% in tensile modulus, at the expense of ductility. In flexure, the modulus decreases by roughly 15-35% compared with the matrix, whereas configurations with 3-6 mm at 2.5-5 wt.% raise the fracture stress by about 35-45% and improve post-peak resistance. In compression, reinforcement markedly elevates yield stress, with increases of up to about 160% at 3 mm/2 wt.%, while the ultimate strain decreases moderately. In Charpy impact, all reinforced materials underperform the resin, with absorbed energy reduced by roughly 75-93% depending on fibre length and content, with 3 mm/1 wt.% being the least affected. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that fibre length primarily governs tensile and compressive behaviour, while fibre content dominates flexural and impact responses. Overall, the findings support wool fibres as a viable reinforcement when length and content are optimized, pointing to their use in non-structural to semi-structural industrial components such as interior panels, housings, casings, protective covers, and other parts where moderate tensile/compressive performance is sufficient and material sustainability is prioritised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235391
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical Performance of Wool-Reinforced Epoxy Composites: Tensile, Flexural, Compressive, and Impact Analysis

Guillermo Guerrero‐Vaca, Carlos Ruiz-Díaz, Óscar Rodríguez‐Alabanda
3 citations
Materials
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
1.82
article

Mechanical Performance of Wool-Reinforced Epoxy Composites: Tensile, Flexural, Compressive, and Impact Analysis

Guillermo Guerrero‐Vaca, Carlos Ruiz-Díaz, Óscar Rodríguez‐Alabanda
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study situates washed sheep-wool fibres as a sustainable reinforcement candidate for epoxy matrices and evaluates their mechanical response under tensile, flexural, compressive, and Charpy impact loading. The objective of this work is to assess whether short, washed sheep-wool fibres can function as a sustainable reinforcement for epoxy matrices, and to identify optimal fibre length-content windows that improve mechanical behaviour for engineering applications. Moulded-machined specimens were produced with fibre lengths of 3, 6, and 10 mm and contents of 1.0-5.0 wt.%, depending on the test; neat epoxy served as the reference. In tension, selected formulations-particularly 10 mm/1.5 wt.%-showed simultaneous increases in ultimate stress and modulus relative to the neat resin, corresponding to gains of about 10% in ultimate tensile stress and 50% in tensile modulus, at the expense of ductility. In flexure, the modulus decreases by roughly 15-35% compared with the matrix, whereas configurations with 3-6 mm at 2.5-5 wt.% raise the fracture stress by about 35-45% and improve post-peak resistance. In compression, reinforcement markedly elevates yield stress, with increases of up to about 160% at 3 mm/2 wt.%, while the ultimate strain decreases moderately. In Charpy impact, all reinforced materials underperform the resin, with absorbed energy reduced by roughly 75-93% depending on fibre length and content, with 3 mm/1 wt.% being the least affected. A two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicates that fibre length primarily governs tensile and compressive behaviour, while fibre content dominates flexural and impact responses. Overall, the findings support wool fibres as a viable reinforcement when length and content are optimized, pointing to their use in non-structural to semi-structural industrial components such as interior panels, housings, casings, protective covers, and other parts where moderate tensile/compressive performance is sufficient and material sustainability is prioritised.

MaterialsVol. 18(23)
University of Córdoba (ES), Cordoba University (US)
Universidad de Córdoba
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.