Epigenetic mechanisms in aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture: A systematic review

IntroductionIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) affect approximately 3.2% of the global population, and their rupture leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality despite therapeutic advancements. While genetic factors have been implicated in IA pathogenesis, they account for only about 41% of heritability, suggesting that other mechanisms-particularly epigenetic modifications-may play a critical role. Epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA regulation have been shown to mediate gene-environment interactions, influencing endothelial function and vascular remodeling. This systematic review aims to synthesize the current literature on epigenetic mechanisms implicated in IA development, progression, and rupture.MethodsThe review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including both in vitro and in vivo studies available in PubMed up to November 2023. A total of 1019 studies were screened, resulting in 77 eligible full-text articles for data extraction.ResultsThe most frequently studied mechanisms were microRNAs (59.7%), DNA/RNA methylation (20.8%), circular RNAs (7.8%), long non-coding RNAs (6.5%), and histone modifications (5.2%). Notably, only three overlapping epigenetic targets were identified across studies, underscoring the field's methodological heterogeneity and lack of standardization. These individual epigenetic pathways are further examined in detail within the Discussion section.ConclusionThese findings underscore the emerging role of epigenetic research in elucidating novel pathways of intracranial aneurysm pathogenesis, while the limited reproducibility across studies highlights the need for standardized methodologies and larger, more diverse cohorts. Epigenetic regulation remains a promising target for future genetic and therapeutic investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Neuroradiology
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251391864
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epigenetic mechanisms in aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture: A systematic review

Joshua S. Catapano, Michael Covell, Georgios S. Sioutas, Najib Muhammad et al.
Interventional Neuroradiology
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Epigenetic mechanisms in aneurysm formation, growth, and rupture: A systematic review

Joshua S. Catapano, Michael Covell, Georgios S. Sioutas, Najib Muhammad, Oleg Shekhtman, Gennadii Piavchenko, Stephen Capone, Irina‐Mihaela Matache, Sandeep Kandregula, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan, Ilayda Kayir
article en

Abstract

IntroductionIntracranial aneurysms (IAs) affect approximately 3.2% of the global population, and their rupture leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality despite therapeutic advancements. While genetic factors have been implicated in IA pathogenesis, they account for only about 41% of heritability, suggesting that other mechanisms-particularly epigenetic modifications-may play a critical role. Epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNA regulation have been shown to mediate gene-environment interactions, influencing endothelial function and vascular remodeling. This systematic review aims to synthesize the current literature on epigenetic mechanisms implicated in IA development, progression, and rupture.MethodsThe review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including both in vitro and in vivo studies available in PubMed up to November 2023. A total of 1019 studies were screened, resulting in 77 eligible full-text articles for data extraction.ResultsThe most frequently studied mechanisms were microRNAs (59.7%), DNA/RNA methylation (20.8%), circular RNAs (7.8%), long non-coding RNAs (6.5%), and histone modifications (5.2%). Notably, only three overlapping epigenetic targets were identified across studies, underscoring the field's methodological heterogeneity and lack of standardization. These individual epigenetic pathways are further examined in detail within the Discussion section.ConclusionThese findings underscore the emerging role of epigenetic research in elucidating novel pathways of intracranial aneurysm pathogenesis, while the limited reproducibility across studies highlights the need for standardized methodologies and larger, more diverse cohorts. Epigenetic regulation remains a promising target for future genetic and therapeutic investigations.

Interventional Neuroradiology
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Sechenov University (RU), Georgetown University (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Carilion Clinic (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.