The Impacts of China’s Shadow Banking Regulation Intensity on Bank Risks

The impacts of shadow banking regulation on bank risks remain inadequately understood in existing literature. To address this gap, we develop a comprehensive index of China’s shadow banking regulation intensity through textual analysis and machine learning techniques to empirically examine regulatory effects on banks’ multidimensional risks. Analyzing data of 181 commercial banks from 2007 to 2020 in China, we demonstrate that intensified shadow banking regulation leads to higher risk, manifested by more non-performing loans, lower profitability, and more conservative practices, as indicated by higher loan loss provisions and lower liquidity risk. The findings remain robust across multiple endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism tests confirm that the channel behind these effects is that tighter shadow banking regulation curtails banks’ shadow banking business. Moreover, expansionary monetary policy attenuates the economic costs of regulation and vice versa. These findings provide insights for authorities to enhance the effectiveness of regulatory policies. JEL Classifications: E61, G18, G21

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251395782
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impacts of China’s Shadow Banking Regulation Intensity on Bank Risks

Qian Gong, Ruihui Xu, Sha Sun, Ting Yan
SAGE Open
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

The Impacts of China’s Shadow Banking Regulation Intensity on Bank Risks

Qian Gong, Ruihui Xu, Sha Sun, Ting Yan
article en

Abstract

The impacts of shadow banking regulation on bank risks remain inadequately understood in existing literature. To address this gap, we develop a comprehensive index of China’s shadow banking regulation intensity through textual analysis and machine learning techniques to empirically examine regulatory effects on banks’ multidimensional risks. Analyzing data of 181 commercial banks from 2007 to 2020 in China, we demonstrate that intensified shadow banking regulation leads to higher risk, manifested by more non-performing loans, lower profitability, and more conservative practices, as indicated by higher loan loss provisions and lower liquidity risk. The findings remain robust across multiple endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism tests confirm that the channel behind these effects is that tighter shadow banking regulation curtails banks’ shadow banking business. Moreover, expansionary monetary policy attenuates the economic costs of regulation and vice versa. These findings provide insights for authorities to enhance the effectiveness of regulatory policies. JEL Classifications: E61, G18, G21

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Beijing Foreign Studies University (CN), People's Bank of China (CN), Beijing International Studies University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.