How Apocalyptic Disrupts Theological Tradition Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief, Hart.David BentleyGrand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022.

Coming from a theologian who has maintained a high medieval view of Nicene Orthodoxy against the ravages of Augustinianism, this review essay of David Bentley Hart's Tradition and Apocalypse excavates the unspoken liberal Protestant provenance of his historicist critique of predominant notions of sacred tradition in Orthodox and Catholic circles. Critiques of John Henry Newman and Maurice Blondel demonstrate this claim. His appeal to apocalyptic is also shown silently to rely upon the twentieth-century rediscovery of biblical apocalyptic, from yet another quarter of Protestantism. The apocalyptic ferment of the gospel issuing in doctrinal novelty is illustrated by the Nicene theology: Arius is the defender of traditional formulas and Athanasius the innovator. Yet at the decisive juncture, Hart retreats from the prosecution of bad faith dogmatism, shoring up failed Christendom to find consolation in the metaphysics of the Good. This move, however, leaves him on the horns of a dilemma.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512251404871
Primary Topic
Catholicism and Religious Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Apocalyptic Disrupts Theological Tradition Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief, Hart.David BentleyGrand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022.

Paul R. Hinlicky
Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology
Catholicism and Religious Studies
article

How Apocalyptic Disrupts Theological Tradition Tradition and Apocalypse: An Essay on the Future of Christian Belief, Hart.David BentleyGrand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022.

Paul R. Hinlicky
article en

Abstract

Coming from a theologian who has maintained a high medieval view of Nicene Orthodoxy against the ravages of Augustinianism, this review essay of David Bentley Hart's Tradition and Apocalypse excavates the unspoken liberal Protestant provenance of his historicist critique of predominant notions of sacred tradition in Orthodox and Catholic circles. Critiques of John Henry Newman and Maurice Blondel demonstrate this claim. His appeal to apocalyptic is also shown silently to rely upon the twentieth-century rediscovery of biblical apocalyptic, from yet another quarter of Protestantism. The apocalyptic ferment of the gospel issuing in doctrinal novelty is illustrated by the Nicene theology: Arius is the defender of traditional formulas and Athanasius the innovator. Yet at the decisive juncture, Hart retreats from the prosecution of bad faith dogmatism, shoring up failed Christendom to find consolation in the metaphysics of the Good. This move, however, leaves him on the horns of a dilemma.

Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyVol. 33(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Catholicism and Religious Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.