Uncertainty and Collective Caution: Humanitarian Security Strategies in Afghanistan Post-Taliban Takeover

Afghanistan has long been a challenging environment for humanitarian operations, with aid workers frequently targeted by violence. Following the Taliban's takeover in 2021, attacks on humanitarian personnel dropped significantly, reflecting the cessation of widespread armed insurgency. Despite this reduction, International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) experience a feeling of insecurity stemming from uncertainty about governance, restrictive decrees, limited reliable information, and the presence of other armed groups. This article examines how a feeling of uncertainty among INGOs shapes their security strategies in Afghanistan. Drawing on interviews with senior humanitarian staff and managers, this study examines the persistence of security measures despite changes in the threat landscape. It highlights how uncertainty replaced violence as the dominant form of insecurity, through interrelated processes that mirror and reinforce one another, perpetuating institutional practices and fostering standardization in security measures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Published
2025-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251399849
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty and Collective Caution: Humanitarian Security Strategies in Afghanistan Post-Taliban Takeover

Faryaneh Fadaeiresketi
Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Uncertainty and Collective Caution: Humanitarian Security Strategies in Afghanistan Post-Taliban Takeover

Faryaneh Fadaeiresketi
article en

Abstract

Afghanistan has long been a challenging environment for humanitarian operations, with aid workers frequently targeted by violence. Following the Taliban's takeover in 2021, attacks on humanitarian personnel dropped significantly, reflecting the cessation of widespread armed insurgency. Despite this reduction, International Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) experience a feeling of insecurity stemming from uncertainty about governance, restrictive decrees, limited reliable information, and the presence of other armed groups. This article examines how a feeling of uncertainty among INGOs shapes their security strategies in Afghanistan. Drawing on interviews with senior humanitarian staff and managers, this study examines the persistence of security measures despite changes in the threat landscape. It highlights how uncertainty replaced violence as the dominant form of insecurity, through interrelated processes that mirror and reinforce one another, perpetuating institutional practices and fostering standardization in security measures.

Journal of Peacebuilding & Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncertainty and Collective Caution: Humanitarian Security Strategies in Afghanistan Post-Taliban Takeover — Faryaneh Fadaeiresketi · Journal of Peacebuilding & Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS